Revel F208 vs Polk Audio Reserve R700

Last updated: August 18, 2026

Short answer: the Revel F208 for better sound quality, the Polk Audio Reserve R700 for the lower price. The Revel F208 ranks #14 of 56 floorstanding speakers at $2400. The Polk Audio Reserve R700 ranks #24 at $1199, $1201 cheaper.

What the Revel F208 offers: CEA2034 spinorama shows a fairly even on-axis response with sensitivity matching spec at ~87-88dB. Watch for: Some directivity error and tweeter-response ripple right at the 2.2kHz crossover point.

On the Polk Audio Reserve R700 side: Three-way design with a 1” ring radiator tweeter, 6.5” mid-range, and dual 8” mid-bass drivers in a ported, down-firing cabinet. Set against that: Compression in the high frequencies rises sharply between 96dB and 102dB output - a real limitation only at very high volumes (around 100dB at 3 meters), but a clear step down from pricier ($5,000+) towers.

Buy the Revel F208 if sound quality matters more than the price. Buy the Polk Audio Reserve R700 if the price matters more than sound quality.

Revel F208 vs Polk Audio Reserve R700

Specifications Side By Side

Revel F208 Polk Audio Reserve R700
Price$2400 used, Discontinued$1,199.00
Ranked#14 of 56 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers#24 of 56 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)24Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)31Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)47Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)40Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Dimensions46.6"H x 13.5"W x 14.8"D (1183.6 x 342.9 x 375.9 mm)45"H x 12.6"W x 16.9"D (1143.8 x 320.7 x 428.3 mm)
Impedance8 ohms nominal, 3.5 ohms minimum (measured, Audio Science Review)4 ohms nominal, 3.5 ohms minimum (measured above 80Hz, Erin’s Audio Corner)
DriversDual 8" (20 cm) Aluminum Cone, Cast-frame Woofers, 5.25" (13.3 cm) Aluminum Cone, Cast-frame Midrange, 1" (2.5 cm) Aluminum Tweeter with Acoustic Lens Waveguide2x 8" polypropylene cone woofers, 1x 6.5" turbine cone midrange, 1x 1" Pinnacle ring radiator tweeter
Sensitivity88.2dB (measured by Audio Science Review; 88.5dB manufacturer specified)87.5dB (measured average 300Hz-3kHz @ 2.83V/1m, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Weight79.4 lbs / 36 kg each102.1 lbs / 46.3 kg
Woofer Cabinetported, frontported, down-firing
DiscontinuedYes-

More useful head-to-heads from the same speaker class:

The Two Speakers In Full

Revel F208: $2400 used, Discontinued

Revel F208 ranking card

Pros: CEA2034 spinorama shows a fairly even on-axis response with sensitivity matching spec at ~87-88dB. Predicted in-room response is a smooth, textbook-quality downward slope that should translate well to most rooms without correction. Early reflections sum so cleanly with the direct sound that side-wall absorption isn’t recommended - it would work against the speaker’s naturally well-integrated off-axis behavior. Distortion stays below 0.5% from 100Hz up at 96dB/1m, with all distortion components falling below audible threshold above 200Hz. Very wide horizontal directivity of about ±75 degrees. Measured performance was judged very close to Revel’s own flagship Salon2, and Revel’s speakers (including this one) are developed using Harman’s double-blind listening test methodology. Preference score of 6.6 (7.7 with a subwoofer added).

Cons: Some directivity error and tweeter-response ripple right at the 2.2kHz crossover point. A notable on-axis dip at about 4kHz, attributed to probable cabinet diffraction. Cumulative spectral decay (waterfall) shows an unexplained resonance around 4-5kHz that the reviewer couldn’t pin down a clear cause for. Vertical directivity shows narrowband interference nulls just above and below the tweeter axis (roughly 2-3kHz), typical of a non-coaxial tower with vertically separated drivers, so listening height matters more than it would with a coincident design. Minimum impedance dips to 3.4 ohms, calling for a robust, high-current amplifier. Distortion climbs substantially below about 80-100Hz (up to ~5% in the deep bass) when driven hard, an excursion-limited trade-off typical of towers at high output. Isolating the woofers alone shows their usable range ending around 500-700Hz at the crossover, with somewhat elevated (though still low in absolute terms) 2nd/3rd harmonic distortion in the 100-300Hz region. Discontinued.

Bass Extension (-10dB)24Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)47Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Dimensions46.6"H x 13.5"W x 14.8"D (1183.6 x 342.9 x 375.9 mm)
DiscontinuedYes
DriversDual 8" (20 cm) Aluminum Cone, Cast-frame Woofers, 5.25" (13.3 cm) Aluminum Cone, Cast-frame Midrange, 1" (2.5 cm) Aluminum Tweeter with Acoustic Lens Waveguide
Impedance8 ohms nominal, 3.5 ohms minimum (measured, Audio Science Review)
Sensitivity88.2dB (measured by Audio Science Review; 88.5dB manufacturer specified)
Weight79.4 lbs / 36 kg each
Woofer Cabinetported, front

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Polk Audio Reserve R700: $1,199.00 Amazon

Polk Audio Reserve R700 ranking card

Pros: Three-way design with a 1” ring radiator tweeter, 6.5” mid-range, and dual 8” mid-bass drivers in a ported, down-firing cabinet. On-axis frequency response holds within about ±2dB across most of its range, with genuinely deep bass extension (F3 40Hz) reaching into the mid-30s Hz in-room. Wide horizontal radiation of about ±70°, giving a strong, enveloping stereo width and stage-extension effect on well-recorded tracks. Good low-level dynamics - solid bass thump at quiet listening volumes without over-accentuation. Strong distortion and compression control through the bass and midrange. Real nominal impedance closer to 4 ohms than the marketed 8 ohms, so with the right amplifier it can be driven hard - a $3,000 two-channel integrated brought out significantly more life than a budget $300 unit could. Excellent value at its roughly $2,200/pair MSRP, ranking among the reviewer’s top picks under $2,500; outperforms the similarly-priced Klipsch RP-8000F II in bass extension and overall smoothness.

Cons: Compression in the high frequencies rises sharply between 96dB and 102dB output - a real limitation only at very high volumes (around 100dB at 3 meters), but a clear step down from pricier ($5,000+) towers. Horizontal directivity mismatch around 4-5kHz, where the tweeter flares wider than the midrange, can sound a bit forward - especially noticeable when toed out further into the room; sidewall absorption or curtains help tame it. Harmonic distortion crosses the reviewer’s 3% threshold around 7kHz at 96dB output, possibly contributing to that same forward quality at high volume. Narrow vertical sweet spot (about ±15° from the tweeter axis), typical of non-coaxial tower designs - more of a consideration for multi-row home theater seating than single-row listening. The ring-radiator tweeter narrows noticeably above about 7-8kHz, and toeing the speaker out more than about 20° causes the top end to fall off quickly. Needs at least 2 feet of clearance from the rear wall to avoid boomy, exaggerated bass, since it lacks the bass-shelf tuning some rivals use to allow closer wall placement. Compared to the pricier KEF R5 Meta, has narrower horizontal (and much narrower vertical) directivity, so seating flexibility is more limited.

Bass Extension (-10dB)31Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)40Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Dimensions45"H x 12.6"W x 16.9"D (1143.8 x 320.7 x 428.3 mm)
Drivers2x 8" polypropylene cone woofers, 1x 6.5" turbine cone midrange, 1x 1" Pinnacle ring radiator tweeter
Impedance4 ohms nominal, 3.5 ohms minimum (measured above 80Hz, Erin's Audio Corner)
Sensitivity87.5dB (measured average 300Hz-3kHz @ 2.83V/1m, Erin's Audio Corner)
Weight102.1 lbs / 46.3 kg
Woofer Cabinetported, down-firing

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.