Short answer: choose between the RCF NX 910-A and Yamaha DXR15mkII by matching the speaker to the deployment rather than treating their ranking positions as a universal verdict. Coverage, cabinet format, bass extension, output capability, DSP, and service support all matter in a PA system.
Why choose the RCF NX 910-A. The plywood enclosure and FiRPHASE/Bass Motion Control processing make it a sturdier systems alternative to the ART 710-A MK5, with a wide 100° x 60° pattern and 130dB claimed peak.
Why choose the Yamaha DXR15mkII. A proven, broadly distributed workhorse: medium-quality vendor data shows a 4.37 ideal-subwoofer preference score with 61Hz measured extension, and Yamaha’s FIR-X processing and D-CONTOUR presets simplify setup.
What to weigh before buying. The truncated vendor measurement does not yield a preference score, preventing a confident tonal comparison with the scored leaders. At 16.4kg it is heavier than the ART-series alternative. The preference score sits mid-pack for this ranking, and it lacks app control or Bluetooth audio found on some newer competitors.
Buy the RCF NX 910-A when its stated coverage, output, processing, and installation format fit the job better.
Buy the Yamaha DXR15mkII when its stated strengths better suit the venue and the rest of the system.

Specifications Side By Side
| RCF NX 910-A | Yamaha DXR15mkII | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,349.00 | $899.99 |
| Ranked | #13 of 19 in 10-Inch Two-Way Powered PA Speakers | #14 of 29 in 15-Inch Two-Way Powered PA Speakers |
| Configuration | Active 2-way bass-reflex PA speaker | Active 2-way bass-reflex PA speaker |
| Drivers | 10" woofer, compression driver | 15" woofer, 1.75" compression driver |
| Frequency Response | 50Hz - 20kHz (manufacturer specified) | 49Hz - 20kHz (-10dB, manufacturer specified) |
| Dimensions | 20.1"H x 11.6"W x 13.1"D (510 x 294.2 x 332.3 mm) | 27.6"H x 17.5"W x 15"D (700 x 445 x 380 mm) |
| Coverage | 100° x 60° | - |
| Maximum SPL | 130dB peak (manufacturer specified) | 134dB peak (manufacturer specified) |
| Inputs | XLR/TRS combo input and XLR output | XLR, dual 1/4-inch, stereo RCA; XLR thru and link outputs |
| Amplifier Power | 2100W peak (1400W LF + 700W HF) | 1100W dynamic / 700W continuous (950W LF + 150W HF dynamic) |
| Crossover Frequency | 1600Hz | - |
| Cabinet Material | Polyurea-coated plywood | Matte-finish ABS |
| Rigging | 5 x M10 inserts | 3 x M10 points; 35mm dual-angle pole mount |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 69Hz (measured, vendor Spinorama data) | 67Hz (measured, vendor Spinorama data) |
| DSP | Yes, FiRPHASE and Bass Motion Control | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Weight | 36.2 lbs / 16.4 kg | 48.1 lbs / 21.8 kg |
Related Speaker Comparisons
Other pairings from the same speaker class worth checking:
- Yamaha DBR10 vs RCF ART 745-A MK4
- Vue Audiotechnik A-10 vs RCF ART 710-A MK5
- RCF ART 710-A MK5 vs Yamaha DZR10
- RCF NX 910-A vs QSC K12.2
- Yamaha DXR10mkIII vs RCF NX 910-A
Prices on this page were last checked September 7, 2026 at 7:47 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
RCF NX 910-A: $1,349.00 Amazon B&H Photo Video Guitar Center eBay
Pros: The plywood enclosure and FiRPHASE/Bass Motion Control processing make it a sturdier systems alternative to the ART 710-A MK5, with a wide 100° x 60° pattern and 130dB claimed peak.
Cons: The truncated vendor measurement does not yield a preference score, preventing a confident tonal comparison with the scored leaders. At 16.4kg it is heavier than the ART-series alternative.
Full RCF NX 910-A review and specifications →
| Amplifier Power | 2100W peak (1400W LF + 700W HF) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 69Hz (measured, vendor Spinorama data) |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Cabinet Material | Polyurea-coated plywood |
| Configuration | Active 2-way bass-reflex PA speaker |
| Coverage | 100° x 60° |
| Crossover Frequency | 1600Hz |
| DSP | Yes, FiRPHASE and Bass Motion Control |
| Dimensions | 20.1"H x 11.6"W x 13.1"D (510 x 294.2 x 332.3 mm) |
| Drivers | 10" woofer, compression driver |
| Frequency Response | 50Hz - 20kHz (manufacturer specified) |
| Inputs | XLR/TRS combo input and XLR output |
| Maximum SPL | 130dB peak (manufacturer specified) |
| Rigging | 5 x M10 inserts |
| Weight | 36.2 lbs / 16.4 kg |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
Yamaha DXR15mkII: $899.99 Amazon B&H Photo Video Guitar Center eBay
Pros: A proven, broadly distributed workhorse: medium-quality vendor data shows a 4.37 ideal-subwoofer preference score with 61Hz measured extension, and Yamaha’s FIR-X processing and D-CONTOUR presets simplify setup.
Cons: The preference score sits mid-pack for this ranking, and it lacks app control or Bluetooth audio found on some newer competitors.
Full Yamaha DXR15mkII review and specifications →
| Amplifier Power | 1100W dynamic / 700W continuous (950W LF + 150W HF dynamic) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 67Hz (measured, vendor Spinorama data) |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Cabinet Material | Matte-finish ABS |
| Configuration | Active 2-way bass-reflex PA speaker |
| DSP | Yes |
| Dimensions | 27.6"H x 17.5"W x 15"D (700 x 445 x 380 mm) |
| Drivers | 15" woofer, 1.75" compression driver |
| Frequency Response | 49Hz - 20kHz (-10dB, manufacturer specified) |
| Inputs | XLR, dual 1/4-inch, stereo RCA; XLR thru and link outputs |
| Maximum SPL | 134dB peak (manufacturer specified) |
| Rigging | 3 x M10 points; 35mm dual-angle pole mount |
| Weight | 48.1 lbs / 21.8 kg |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Yamaha DXR15mkII vs FBT Mitus 115A
- Yamaha DXR15mkII vs Electro-Voice MFX-15MC
- Yamaha DXR15mkII vs RCF ART 715-A MK5
- Yamaha DXR15mkII vs Yamaha DXR15mkIII
- Yamaha DXR15mkII vs RCF NX 915-A
- Yamaha DXR15mkII vs RCF ART 935-A
- Yamaha DXR15mkII vs RCF ART 745-A MK5
- Yamaha DXR15mkII vs JBL PRX915
- See all 19 comparisons

