Short answer: the Queen of Audio Cloudscape. It ranks #948 of 1369 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 3.3/5, at $119; the Harmonic Empire GuoJia ranks #1000, rated 3.2/5, at $119. With prices this close, go by the sound-quality ranking rather than the cost.
What the Queen of Audio Cloudscape does well: A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 65 against the Harman target. The tradeoff: An uneven response, 2.3 dB standard deviation from target.
What the Harmonic Empire GuoJia does well: A published AutoEQ preset corrects its response toward the Harman target, so a few minutes of EQ setup closes most of the gap. The tradeoff: Treble about 6 dB below target from 3 to 10 kHz, which can sound dull or veiled next to brighter headphones.
Buy the Queen of Audio Cloudscape. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Harmonic Empire GuoJia at the same price, which makes it the one to get unless you need something the other one does better.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.
A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 65 against the Harman target.
Queen of Audio $119 eBay
A published AutoEQ preset corrects its response toward the Harman target, so a few minutes of EQ setup closes most of the gap.
Tangzu $119.00 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 17, 2026 at 6:04 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| Queen of Audio Cloudscape | Harmonic Empire GuoJia | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $119 | $119.00 |
| Ranked | #948 of 1369 in In-Ear Headphones | #1000 of 1369 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 65 (median of 6 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 64 (median of 3 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.32 dB standard deviation | 2.59 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -1.00 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.68 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+2.1 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-2.0 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Hybrid (Dynamic + Planar) | Dual Dynamic |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm polymer dynamic driver + 1 x micro-planar driver | 2 x 10mm dynamic drivers (solid wood sliced diaphragm + PET diaphragm) |
| Impedance | 32 ohms | 20 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 102 dB | 114 dB |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 20kHz | 20Hz - 20kHz |
| Weight | Not specified | - |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the Queen of Audio Cloudscape from audioamigo, boizoff, jaytiss, kuping-sensi, practiphile, pw and soundcheck39; the Harmonic Empire GuoJia from audioamigo, bassaudio and csi-zone, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
More top alternatives to Queen of Audio Cloudscape: