Queen of Audio Cloudscape vs Arisyn BAI YONG

Last updated: October 17, 2026

Short answer: the Queen of Audio Cloudscape. It ranks #948 of 1369 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 3.3/5, at $119; the Arisyn BAI YONG ranks #1005, rated 3.2/5, at $118. The price gap is small enough that the sound-quality ranking should decide it.

Queen of Audio Cloudscape vs Arisyn BAI YONG

The case for the Queen of Audio Cloudscape: A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 65 against the Harman target. The catch: An uneven response, 2.3 dB standard deviation from target.

The case for the Arisyn BAI YONG: A published AutoEQ preset corrects its response toward the Harman target, so a few minutes of EQ setup closes most of the gap. The catch: About 3 dB less bass than the Harman target below 150 Hz, which can sound thin on pop, hip hop and electronic music.

Buy the Queen of Audio Cloudscape. It is rated higher for sound quality, and the $1 you would save on the Arisyn BAI YONG does not close the gap.

Want more options? Browse the full Headphones rankings.

Queen of Audio Cloudscape

A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 65 against the Harman target.

Queen of Audio $119 eBay
$119
Arisyn BAI YONG

A published AutoEQ preset corrects its response toward the Harman target, so a few minutes of EQ setup closes most of the gap.

Audione $118.00 eBay
$118

Prices on this page were last checked October 17, 2026 at 6:04 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

Queen of Audio Cloudscape Arisyn BAI YONG
Price$119$118.00
Ranked#948 of 1369 in In-Ear Headphones#1005 of 1369 in In-Ear Headphones
Form FactorIn-earIn-ear
BackClosedClosed
Harman Preference Score65 (median of 6 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)64 (median of 3 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)
Deviation From Target2.32 dB standard deviation3.16 dB standard deviation
Tonal Tilt-1.00 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)+0.10 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+2.1 dB at 30 Hz)Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-5.1 dB at 30 Hz)
ConnectionWiredWired
Driver TypeHybrid (Dynamic + Planar)Hybrid (1 dynamic + 1 MEMS)
Drivers1 x 10mm polymer dynamic driver + 1 x micro-planar driver1 x 10mm LCP dynamic driver + 1 x solid-state MEMS driver
Impedance32 ohms16 ohms
Sensitivity102 dB105 dB
Frequency Response20Hz - 20kHz20Hz - 20kHz
WeightNot specified-

Frequency Response Compared

Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.

Queen of Audio CloudscapeArisyn BAI YONGHarman target
Frequency response of the Queen of Audio Cloudscape and Arisyn BAI YONG-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: the Queen of Audio Cloudscape from audioamigo, boizoff, jaytiss, kuping-sensi, practiphile, pw and soundcheck39; the Arisyn BAI YONG from audioamigo, jaytiss and soundcheck39, all via squig.link.

More top alternatives to Queen of Audio Cloudscape: