Polk Monitor XT20 vs Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2

Last updated: October 1, 2026

Short answer: the Polk Monitor XT20. It ranks #93 of 134 bookshelf speakers by sound quality, rated 3.4/5, at $279; the Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2 ranks #106, rated 3.1/5, and costs $3,500, so there is little reason to consider the other one.

Polk Monitor XT20 vs Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2

Buy the Polk Monitor XT20. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2 and costs less, so it is the default pick unless a specific strength of the other one matters more to you.

Looking for alternatives? See the complete Passive Home rankings.

Specifications Side By Side

Polk Monitor XT20 Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2
Price$279.00 per pair$3500 per pair
Ranked#93 of 134 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers#106 of 134 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)43.4Hz (derived, log-interpolated between spinorama.org -9dB/-12dB points)38Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)64.5Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)62Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Dimensions13”H x 7.5”W x 11”D (330.2 x 190.5 x 279.4 mm)16.3”H x 8.9”W x 14”D (414.3 x 227.0 x 355.6 mm)
Impedance8 ohms nominal (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)4 ohms nominal (4.2 ohms minimum, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity86dB (measured by Erin’s Audio Corner; 87dB manufacturer specified)87dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Drivers6.5” bilaminate paper cone woofer, 1” Terylene dome tweeter1x 6.5” mid-woofer (paper cone), 1x 1.1” (28mm) DAD soft dome tweeter
Weight11.9 lbs (5.4 kg) each38.4 lbs (17.4 kg)
Woofer Cabinetportedported, front
Spinorama Preference Score4.714.25
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.076.54
DIY KitNoNo

How Polk Monitor XT20 compares with other leading options:

Prices on this page were last checked October 3, 2026 at 10:26 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

Polk Monitor XT20: $279.00 per pair Amazon Crutchfield eBay

Polk Monitor XT20 ranking card

Pros: Two-way bookshelf design with a 1” tweeter and 6.5” woofer, part of Polk’s budget-friendly XT lineup (spanning roughly $200-700 across the series). Measures more linear and has fewer/smaller cabinet resonances than its smaller sibling, the XT15, making it (by the reviewer’s own assessment) probably the better of the two based on data alone. Reasonably good bass output for the price and size, with an F3 of 63Hz. Horizontal radiation of about ±50° gives a respectable, enjoyable soundstage width. Takes well to EQ correction: the early-reflections directivity trend is decently linear, meaning tonal adjustments can meaningfully improve the sound. Provides usable, respectable volume when paired with a subwoofer crossover, even though it isn’t intended to play extremely loud on its own. Measured bass extension of 64.5Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 86dB.

Cons: Notably bright treble, elevated roughly 1-5dB above the midrange depending on frequency: a characteristic shared across the whole Polk XT lineup, requiring either EQ or toe-out to tame. Small resonances appear around 300Hz and 800Hz, with some of that energy leaking from the port area. Vertical listening window is narrow: best kept close to the tweeter axis, with only a couple of degrees of tolerance above or below before the sound changes. Still needs a subwoofer for real low-end extension despite the decent F3. Overall linearity isn’t state-of-the-art flat, and while the reviewer found it pleasant, some artificial brightness remains even after basic EQ correction in the crossover region.

Bass Extension (-10dB)43.4Hz (derived, log-interpolated between spinorama.org -9dB/-12dB points)
Bass Extension (-3dB)64.5Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions13”H x 7.5”W x 11”D (330.2 x 190.5 x 279.4 mm)
Drivers6.5” bilaminate paper cone woofer, 1” Terylene dome tweeter
Impedance8 ohms nominal (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity86dB (measured by Erin’s Audio Corner; 87dB manufacturer specified)
Spinorama Preference Score4.71
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub7.07
Weight11.9 lbs (5.4 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported

Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2: $3500 per pair Crutchfield eBay

Sonus Faber Sonetto II G2 ranking card

Pros: Two-way design with a 1.125” damped Apex Dome silk tweeter and 6.5” cone woofer, using a base of concrete, aluminum, and steel with under-cabinet venting. Notably more neutral than Sonus Faber’s own Lumina 2, which runs 2-5dB hotter in the treble. Horizontal directivity narrows at a fairly constant, well-behaved rate rather than narrowing-then-widening-then-narrowing like some rivals (including the Lumina 2), meaning sidewall reflections match the direct sound well enough that the reviewer doesn’t recommend sidewall absorption for this speaker. The tweeter-to-woofer crossover handoff around 3kHz looks clean, suggesting a higher-order crossover than typical for the size/price class. Good dynamic range: the low end loses only about 2dB from 76dB to 96dB, otherwise holding up well. Not a difficult amplifier load (about 4.2 ohms minimum impedance). Bass extension reaches a genuine 50Hz in-room, fuller than the Lumina 2. Measured bass extension of 62Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 87dB.

Cons: Sounds notably bright pointed directly on-axis; toeing the speaker out about 30° reduces treble energy and sibilance meaningfully. A resonance around 700Hz gives vocals a slightly nasal, hollow quality. A dip in the upper midrange (roughly 1-2kHz) reduces perceived detail and attack, while the elevated treble can read as “analytical” or “detailed” to some listeners despite being a coloration rather than true resolution. Needs more clearance from the rear wall than some rivals (about 1.5-2 feet in an ideal room, more or less depending on your specific room modes) or the 80-120Hz region can become boomy. Vertical listening window is limited to about ±10-15° from the tweeter axis. Some unexplained directivity irregularities appear around 1.2kHz and 1.6kHz, possibly port-related, along with a longer decay in the 800Hz-1600Hz range in burst-decay measurements. Multitone distortion approaches the reviewer’s 3% threshold through the midrange, though likely not obviously audible without direct A/B comparison. A resonance in the cabinet appears around 400Hz in impedance measurements.

Bass Extension (-10dB)38Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)62Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
DIY KitNo
Dimensions16.3”H x 8.9”W x 14”D (414.3 x 227.0 x 355.6 mm)
Drivers1x 6.5” mid-woofer (paper cone), 1x 1.1” (28mm) DAD soft dome tweeter
Impedance4 ohms nominal (4.2 ohms minimum, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner)
Sensitivity87dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score4.25
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub6.54
Weight38.4 lbs (17.4 kg)
Woofer Cabinetported, front