Short answer: the NiceHCK Himalaya. Both are rated 4.0/5 for sound quality (#404 and #384 of 1291 in-ear headphones), and the NiceHCK Himalaya costs $329 against $359 for the Xenns Mangird Tea Pro, with sound quality a draw, the lower price decides it.
Why pick the NiceHCK Himalaya: The median of 4 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 74 with a 2.05 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.9 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural. The catch: A 4.2 dB peak near 7.9 kHz can make cymbals and sibilance sound sharp.
Why pick the Xenns Mangird Tea Pro: The median of 14 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 74 with a 1.74 dB spread. Watch for: Presence sits about 4.3 dB low with a 6 dB dip near 5.8 kHz, so vocals and instruments lose some bite.
Buy the NiceHCK Himalaya. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $30 less than the Xenns Mangird Tea Pro.
Want more options? Browse the full Headphones rankings.
The median of 4 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 74 with a 2.05 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.9 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural.
Amazon $329.00 eBay
The median of 14 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 74 with a 1.74 dB spread.
Linsoul $359.00 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| NiceHCK Himalaya | Xenns Mangird Tea Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $329.00 | $359.00 |
| Ranked | #404 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #384 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 74 (median of 4 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 74 (median of 14 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.05 dB standard deviation | 1.74 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.17 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.72 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-1.7 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.5 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Dynamic | Hybrid (2 dynamic + 6 balanced armature) |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic | 2 x 8mm dynamic + 6 x balanced armature |
| Impedance | 22 ohms | 13 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 110 dB/mW | 104 dB |
| Frequency Response | - | 20Hz - 22kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Built-in Microphone | - | No |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the NiceHCK Himalaya from atechreviews, hu-fi, superreview and tonedeafmonk; the Xenns Mangird Tea Pro from audioamigo, bassaudio, boizoff, breampike, dl, ducbloke, eliseaudio, fernandagunsan, gadgetrytech, hbb, iemocean, joycesreview, koi, practiphile, sl0the, soundignity, superreview, theaudiostore, timmyv and treblewellxtended, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
How Xenns Mangird Tea Pro compares with other leading options: