Short answer: the Simgot EA2000. It ranks #351 of 1291 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 4.1/5, at $361.99; the Xenns Mangird Tea Pro ranks #384, rated 4.0/5, at $359. Close enough in price that the sound-quality gap is the deciding factor.
What the Simgot EA2000 does well: A single dynamic flagship with bass and treble both within 0.3 dB of the Harman target on average (score 75 across seven measurements). The tradeoff: Its 1.89 dB spread shows some peaks and dips that the averages hide, and cheaper Simgot models such as the Simgot EA500LM measure about as well.
Why pick the Xenns Mangird Tea Pro: The median of 14 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 74 with a 1.74 dB spread. Watch for: Presence sits about 4.3 dB low with a 6 dB dip near 5.8 kHz, so vocals and instruments lose some bite.
Buy the Simgot EA2000. It is rated higher for sound quality, and saving $2.99 with the Xenns Mangird Tea Pro does not make up for the sound-quality gap.
Want more options? Browse the full Headphones rankings.
A single dynamic flagship with bass and treble both within 0.3 dB of the Harman target on average (score 75 across seven measurements).
Linsoul $361.99 eBay
The median of 14 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 74 with a 1.74 dB spread.
Linsoul $359.00 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| Simgot EA2000 | Xenns Mangird Tea Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $361.99 | $359.00 |
| Ranked | #351 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #384 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Dynamic | Hybrid (2 dynamic + 6 balanced armature) |
| Drivers | 1 x 12mm dynamic + 1 x passive radiator | 2 x 8mm dynamic + 6 x balanced armature |
| Harman Preference Score | 75 (median of 7 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 74 (median of 14 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 1.89 dB standard deviation | 1.74 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | +0.05 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.72 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-0.3 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.5 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Impedance | - | 13 ohms |
| Sensitivity | - | 104 dB |
| Frequency Response | - | 20Hz - 22kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Built-in Microphone | - | No |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the Simgot EA2000 from hbb, joycesreview, lown-fi, mmagtech, obodio, sl0the and therollo9; the Xenns Mangird Tea Pro from audioamigo, bassaudio, boizoff, breampike, dl, ducbloke, eliseaudio, fernandagunsan, gadgetrytech, hbb, iemocean, joycesreview, koi, practiphile, sl0the, soundignity, superreview, theaudiostore, timmyv and treblewellxtended, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
How Simgot EA2000 compares with other leading options: