Short answer: the GR-Research X-LS Encore, especially if you can find an AV123-built example. It is called an amazing value, and its on-axis response shows only a slight depression in the upper bass plus some peaking in the lower bass. The ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 stays reasonably flat with even horizontal directivity, but a good size resonant peak around 700Hz and a directivity error around 3.3kHz are the penalties.
The case for the ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2: Reasonably flat on-axis and listening-window response with reasonably even horizontal directivity. Set against that: A good size resonant peak around 700Hz, directivity error around 3.3kHz.
What the GR-Research X-LS Encore gets right: An amazing value, especially if you managed to snag one of these built by AV123 in the early 2000s for $200-300. CEA2034 spinorama shows. Set against that: A slight depression in the upper bass and some peaking in the lower bass shows up on-axis.
Buy the ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $971 less than the GR-Research X-LS Encore.
Want more options? Browse the full Passive Home rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 | GR-Research X-LS Encore | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $329.00 per pair | $1300 per pair |
| Ranked | #87 of 130 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers | #83 of 130 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 40Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) | 44Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 64Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) | 64Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Impedance | 6 ohms nominal, 5.2 ohms minimum (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) | 8 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 86.5dB (measured, Audio Science Review) | 84.4dB (measured by Audio Science Review; 87dB manufacturer specified) |
| Drivers | 25mm tweeter + 165mm woofer | 6.5" Peerless M-165 paper composite cone, non-resonant polymer frame woofer, 1" Peerless India T26SG tweeter |
| Weight | 29.1 lbs (13.2 kg) | 17 lbs (7.7 kg) each |
| Dimensions | 14.8"H x 7.7"W x 10.6"D (375.0 x 195.0 x 268.0 mm) | 13.5"H x 8.5"W x 12.1"D (342.9 x 215.9 x 308 mm) |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, front | ported |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 4.75 (spinorama.org) | 5.05 (measured, spinorama.org) |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.0 (spinorama.org) | 7.42 (measured, spinorama.org) |
| DIY Kit | No | Yes |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More top alternatives to GR-Research X-LS Encore:
- GR-Research X-LS Encore vs Perlisten S4b
- GR-Research X-LS Encore vs KEF Reference 1 Meta
- GR-Research NX-Studio vs GR-Research X-LS Encore
- AsciLab C6B vs GR-Research X-LS Encore
- Audio First Cadentia 3 vs GR-Research X-LS Encore
Prices on this page were last checked September 23, 2026 at 11:24 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2: $329.00 per pair Amazon Crutchfield eBay
Pros: Reasonably flat on-axis and listening-window response with reasonably even horizontal directivity, holding about ±60° up to roughly 8kHz for consistent stereo width whether aimed directly at the listener or toed out. Its larger-than-typical woofer lets it play very loud with minimal distortion, staying under about 1% THD down to 50Hz at 86dB, and minimum impedance stays a comfortable 5-6 ohms. In-room bass extension reaches about 50Hz without much trouble, enough for a solid kick-drum sound. Takes equalization very well - correcting the on-axis response doesn’t cost sensitivity through the midrange, and the underlying directivity behavior (diffraction, vertical mismatch) is mild enough that EQ alone gets most of the way to a well-balanced sound. Vertical tolerance is asymmetric and fairly forgiving: about 10° above the tweeter axis and 20° below it before tonal balance meaningfully shifts. One reviewer called it “a good speaker” with “a good price” rather than just good-for-the-price, and found it fairly neutral overall in-room. Measured bass extension of 64Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 86.5dB.
Cons: A good size resonant peak around 700Hz stands out from an otherwise smooth response and lingers in cumulative spectral decay (waterfall) measurements - in one reviewer’s sighted A/B test, reducing it by about 5dB via EQ made a noticeable but not dramatic difference. Directivity error shows up around 3.3kHz, and the upper-midrange around 4-6kHz stood out as edgy and sharp, almost sibilant at times, in casual listening - the predicted in-room response shows a lack of energy between 1-2kHz and a bit too much above that, which one reviewer thought would sound bright. Distortion at 96dB SPL/1m shows two harmonic peaks the reviewer says “should not be there,” one from woofer breakup around 400Hz and another around 7-8kHz from the tweeter, and multitone distortion approaches 10% in the 500-800Hz range at that output level. Real compression shows up even at moderate volume and worsens at 96dB and above, with the woofer clearly giving up around 60-70Hz - a subwoofer is recommended for anyone wanting to listen loud, since running it full-range at high output costs real dynamic range in the midbass and bass. Don’t place it close to a wall - boundary reinforcement adds a midbass bump that undoes the otherwise smooth, linear response. Getting the best out of it takes EQ (taming the 700Hz peak, filling in the 1-2kHz dip, and trimming the highs).
Full ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 40Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 64Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 14.8"H x 7.7"W x 10.6"D (375.0 x 195.0 x 268.0 mm) |
| Drivers | 25mm tweeter + 165mm woofer |
| Impedance | 6 ohms nominal, 5.2 ohms minimum (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 86.5dB (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 4.75 (spinorama.org) |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.0 (spinorama.org) |
| Weight | 29.1 lbs (13.2 kg) |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, front |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 vs SVS Prime Bookshelf
- ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 vs Dynaudio Special Forty
- ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 vs KEF Q3 Meta
- ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 vs Polk Monitor XT20
- ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 vs Infinity IL10
- ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 vs Sonus Faber Lumina II
- ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 vs XTZ Spirit 4
- ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2 vs Focal Aria 906
- See all 59 comparisons
GR-Research X-LS Encore: $1300 per pair Gr-research eBay
Pros: An amazing value, especially if you managed to snag one of these built by AV123 in the early 2000s for $200-300. CEA2034 spinorama shows a generally flat on-axis response, especially in the listening window. Predicted in-room response is generally smooth and on-target. Distortion at 86dB SPL/1m is pretty clean above 200Hz. Measured bass extension of 64Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 84.4dB.
Cons: A slight depression in the upper bass and some peaking in the lower bass shows up on-axis, along with directivity error in the crossover region. Vertical directivity requires staying within about 20 degrees of the tweeter axis. At 96dB SPL/1m distortion becomes “rather unhappy,” with bass distortion, a possible woofer issue around 2kHz, and a tweeter problem above 7kHz. As a DIY kit, it requires building the cabinet and crossover yourself.
Full GR-Research X-LS Encore review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 44Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 64Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| DIY Kit | Yes |
| Dimensions | 13.5"H x 8.5"W x 12.1"D (342.9 x 215.9 x 308 mm) |
| Drivers | 6.5" Peerless M-165 paper composite cone, non-resonant polymer frame woofer, 1" Peerless India T26SG tweeter |
| Impedance | 8 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 84.4dB (measured by Audio Science Review; 87dB manufacturer specified) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.05 (measured, spinorama.org) |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.42 (measured, spinorama.org) |
| Weight | 17 lbs (7.7 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- GR-Research X-LS Encore vs Dynaudio Special Forty
- GR-Research X-LS Encore vs Mission LX-3 MKII
- GR-Research X-LS Encore vs SVS Prime Bookshelf
- GR-Research X-LS Encore vs KEF Q3 Meta
- GR-Research X-LS Encore vs Polk Monitor XT20
- GR-Research X-LS Encore vs Philharmonic BMR Monitor
- GR-Research X-LS Encore vs Sonus Faber Lumina II
- GR-Research X-LS Encore vs Dynaudio Emit 20
- See all 47 comparisons