Short answer: the KEF Reference 1 Meta on measured sound quality, the GR-Research X-LS Encore on price. The KEF Reference 1 Meta ranks #3 of 130 bookshelf speakers at $9999.98. The GR-Research X-LS Encore ranks #83 at $1300, $8699.98 cheaper.
What the GR-Research X-LS Encore offers: An amazing value, especially if you managed to snag one of these built by AV123 in the early 2000s for $200-300. CEA2034 spinorama shows a generally flat on-axis response, especially in the listening window. Predicted in-room response is generally smooth and on-target. Distortion at 86dB SPL/1m is pretty clean above 200Hz. Watch for: A slight depression in the upper bass and some peaking in the lower bass shows up on-axis, along with directivity error in the crossover region. Vertical directivity requires staying within about 20 degrees of the tweeter axis. At 96dB SPL/1m distortion becomes “rather unhappy,” with bass distortion, a possible woofer issue around 2kHz, and a tweeter problem above 7kHz. As a DIY kit, it requires building the cabinet and crossover yourself.
What the KEF Reference 1 Meta offers: Meta technology places a Helmholtz-style resonator behind the tweeter to absorb rear-radiated resonance, and pair matching is within about ±0.5dB - unusually tight for a passive speaker. Sounds most neutral pointed straight on-axis rather than toed out, with no 5-8kHz harshness of the kind that plagues many speakers marketed as “detailed.” One of the most three-dimensional soundstages the reviewer has heard from a passive speaker, beaten only by $13,000+ active Xmachina Pulsar MK2 monitors (though this speaker’s tonality was preferred). Distortion stays below 1% down to about 70Hz at 86dB, and below 1% to ~150Hz / below 3% to ~70Hz even at 96dB. High-frequency response holds essentially flat as volume increases - no audible crossover or voice-coil compression - giving strong dynamic range up to its output limit (about 98dB at 3.5 meters before the woofer starts running out of excursion). All-passive design still measures ±1.5dB from 80Hz to 16kHz with zero DSP. Swappable dual-port system (long port for near-wall placement, short port for out-into-the-room placement with more bass extension) lets you tune bass behavior to where the speaker actually sits. Watch for: At roughly $9,000/pair, nearly four times the cost of the similarly-sized KEF R3. Radiation narrows from about ±60° in the midrange to ±50° at high frequency - tighter than the reviewer’s ~70° preference (though wider than the R3’s ~±40°); toeing the speakers out for more width sacrifices treble energy that then needs EQ to restore. Moderate-to-low sensitivity (measured 83-84dB) calls for a solid amplifier. In-room bass only extends to about 40Hz, so a subwoofer is worth adding for bass-heavy material at higher volumes or listening beyond 3-4 meters. Minor directivity mismatch around 2kHz shows up in measurements, likely a vertical diffraction effect that wasn’t fully explained. Bass port choice (long vs. short) meaningfully changes the sound depending on placement, so the wrong port for your room can leave the bass sounding off until you experiment.
Buy the GR-Research X-LS Encore if the price is the priority over sound quality, or the KEF Reference 1 Meta if sound quality is the priority over the price.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Passive Home rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| GR-Research X-LS Encore | KEF Reference 1 Meta | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1300 per pair | $10000 per pair |
| Ranked | #83 of 130 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers | #3 of 130 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 44Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) | 32Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 64Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) | 52Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Dimensions | 13.5"H x 8.5"W x 12.1"D (342.9 x 215.9 x 308 mm) | 17.3"H x 8.1"W x 16.6"D (439.4 x 205.7 x 421.6 mm) |
| Impedance | 8 ohms | 4 ohms nominal, 2.9 ohms minimum (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 84.4dB (measured by Audio Science Review; 87dB manufacturer specified) | 82.5dB (measured average, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Drivers | 6.5" Peerless M-165 paper composite cone, non-resonant polymer frame woofer, 1" Peerless India T26SG tweeter | 165 mm (6.5 in.) aluminium cone woofer, 125 mm (5 in.) aluminium cone midrange, 25 mm (1 in.) aluminium dome with MAT tweeter |
| Weight | 17 lbs (7.7 kg) each | 40.1 lbs (18.2 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported | ported, rear |
| Spinorama Preference Score | - | 5.84 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | - | 7.65 |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More top alternatives to KEF Reference 1 Meta:
- Perlisten S4b vs KEF Reference 1 Meta
- GR-Research NX-Studio vs KEF Reference 1 Meta
- KEF Reference 1 Meta vs March Audio Sointuva AWG
- AsciLab C6B vs KEF Reference 1 Meta
- Audio First Cadentia 3 vs KEF Reference 1 Meta
Prices on this page were last checked September 16, 2026 at 12:41 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
GR-Research X-LS Encore: $1300 per pair Gr-research eBay
Pros: An amazing value, especially if you managed to snag one of these built by AV123 in the early 2000s for $200-300. CEA2034 spinorama shows a generally flat on-axis response, especially in the listening window. Predicted in-room response is generally smooth and on-target. Distortion at 86dB SPL/1m is pretty clean above 200Hz. Measured bass extension of 64Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 84.4dB.
Cons: A slight depression in the upper bass and some peaking in the lower bass shows up on-axis, along with directivity error in the crossover region. Vertical directivity requires staying within about 20 degrees of the tweeter axis. At 96dB SPL/1m distortion becomes “rather unhappy,” with bass distortion, a possible woofer issue around 2kHz, and a tweeter problem above 7kHz. As a DIY kit, it requires building the cabinet and crossover yourself.
Full GR-Research X-LS Encore review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 44Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 64Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Dimensions | 13.5"H x 8.5"W x 12.1"D (342.9 x 215.9 x 308 mm) |
| Drivers | 6.5" Peerless M-165 paper composite cone, non-resonant polymer frame woofer, 1" Peerless India T26SG tweeter |
| Impedance | 8 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 84.4dB (measured by Audio Science Review; 87dB manufacturer specified) |
| Weight | 17 lbs (7.7 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- GR-Research X-LS Encore vs Dynaudio Special Forty
- GR-Research X-LS Encore vs Mission LX-3 MKII
- GR-Research X-LS Encore vs ELAC Debut 2.0 B6.2
- GR-Research X-LS Encore vs SVS Prime Bookshelf
- GR-Research X-LS Encore vs KEF Q3 Meta
- GR-Research X-LS Encore vs Polk Monitor XT20
- GR-Research X-LS Encore vs Philharmonic BMR Monitor
- GR-Research X-LS Encore vs Sonus Faber Lumina II
- See all 47 comparisons
KEF Reference 1 Meta: $10000 per pair Kef eBay
Pros: Meta technology places a Helmholtz-style resonator behind the tweeter to absorb rear-radiated resonance, and pair matching is within about ±0.5dB - unusually tight for a passive speaker. Sounds most neutral pointed straight on-axis rather than toed out, with no 5-8kHz harshness of the kind that plagues many speakers marketed as “detailed.” One of the most three-dimensional soundstages the reviewer has heard from a passive speaker, beaten only by $13,000+ active Xmachina Pulsar MK2 monitors (though this speaker’s tonality was preferred). Distortion stays below 1% down to about 70Hz at 86dB, and below 1% to ~150Hz / below 3% to ~70Hz even at 96dB. High-frequency response holds essentially flat as volume increases - no audible crossover or voice-coil compression - giving strong dynamic range up to its output limit (about 98dB at 3.5 meters before the woofer starts running out of excursion). All-passive design still measures ±1.5dB from 80Hz to 16kHz with zero DSP. Swappable dual-port system (long port for near-wall placement, short port for out-into-the-room placement with more bass extension) lets you tune bass behavior to where the speaker actually sits. Measured bass extension of 52Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 82.5dB.
Cons: At roughly $9,000/pair, nearly four times the cost of the similarly-sized KEF R3. Radiation narrows from about ±60° in the midrange to ±50° at high frequency - tighter than the reviewer’s ~70° preference (though wider than the R3’s ~±40°); toeing the speakers out for more width sacrifices treble energy that then needs EQ to restore. Moderate-to-low sensitivity (measured 83-84dB) calls for a solid amplifier. In-room bass only extends to about 40Hz, so a subwoofer is worth adding for bass-heavy material at higher volumes or listening beyond 3-4 meters. Minor directivity mismatch around 2kHz shows up in measurements, likely a vertical diffraction effect that wasn’t fully explained. Bass port choice (long vs. short) meaningfully changes the sound depending on placement, so the wrong port for your room can leave the bass sounding off until you experiment.
Full KEF Reference 1 Meta review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 32Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 52Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Dimensions | 17.3"H x 8.1"W x 16.6"D (439.4 x 205.7 x 421.6 mm) |
| Drivers | 165 mm (6.5 in.) aluminium cone woofer, 125 mm (5 in.) aluminium cone midrange, 25 mm (1 in.) aluminium dome with MAT tweeter |
| Impedance | 4 ohms nominal, 2.9 ohms minimum (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 82.5dB (measured average, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.84 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.65 |
| Weight | 40.1 lbs (18.2 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- KEF Reference 1 Meta vs GR-Research NX-Studio
- KEF Reference 1 Meta vs Perlisten S4b
- KEF Reference 1 Meta vs March Audio Sointuva AWG
- KEF Reference 1 Meta vs AsciLab C6B
- KEF Reference 1 Meta vs Audio First Cadentia 3
- KEF Reference 1 Meta vs Revel M106
- KEF Reference 1 Meta vs KEF R3 Meta
- KEF Reference 1 Meta vs KEF Q Concerto Meta
- See all 46 comparisons