Akoustyx S-6 vs Pula Anvil114

Last updated: October 17, 2026

Short answer: the Pula Anvil114. Both are rated 3.7/5 for sound quality (#681 and #657 of 1291 in-ear headphones), and the Pula Anvil114 costs $194.99 against $200 for the Akoustyx S-6, and with sound quality even, the cheaper one is the better buy.

Akoustyx S-6 vs Pula Anvil114

Why pick the Akoustyx S-6: A single planar magnetic IEM with full sub-bass extension to 20 Hz and a Harman preference score of 70 across three measurements. Watch for: Treble sits about 2.4 dB above target, so it can sound bright.

Why pick the Pula Anvil114: A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 70 against the Harman target. The tradeoff: An uneven response, 2.2 dB standard deviation from target.

Buy the Pula Anvil114. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $5.01 less than the Akoustyx S-6.

Still deciding? The full Headphones rankings cover every ranked option.

Akoustyx S-6

A single planar magnetic IEM with full sub-bass extension to 20 Hz and a Harman preference score of 70 across three measurements.

Akoustyx $200.00 eBay
$200
Pula Anvil114

A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 70 against the Harman target.

HiFiGo $194.99 eBay
$194.99

Prices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

Akoustyx S-6 Pula Anvil114
Price$200.00$194.99
Ranked#657 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones#681 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones
Form FactorIn-earIn-ear
BackClosedClosed
ConnectionWiredWired (3.5mm / 4.4mm)
Driver TypePlanar MagneticTribrid
Drivers1 x planar magnetic1 Dynamic, 4 Balanced Armature, 1 Bone Conduction
Impedance18 ohms-
Sensitivity108 dB SPL-
Harman Preference Score70 (median of 3 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)70 (median of 10 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)
Deviation From Target2.24 dB standard deviation2.18 dB standard deviation
Tonal Tilt-0.32 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)-0.36 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+5.2 dB at 30 Hz)Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-2.2 dB at 30 Hz)

Frequency Response Compared

Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.

Akoustyx S-6Pula Anvil114Harman target
Frequency response of the Akoustyx S-6 and Pula Anvil114-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: the Akoustyx S-6 from dentreviews, superreview and treblewellxtended; the Pula Anvil114 from atechreviews, boizoff, elrics, iemocean, jaytiss, silicagel, sl0the, soundcheck39, soundignity, superreview and tonedeafmonk, all via squig.link.

How Akoustyx S-6 compares with other leading options: