Short answer: the BQEYZ Autumn. It ranks #567 of 1291 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 3.8/5, at $199; the Pula Anvil114 ranks #681, rated 3.7/5, at $194.99. With prices this close, go by the sound-quality ranking rather than the cost.
Why pick the BQEYZ Autumn: The median of 11 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 71 with a 2.42 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural. Watch for: Sub-bass is 4.4 dB short at 30 Hz, so deep bass lacks rumble.
Why pick the Pula Anvil114: A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 70 against the Harman target. The catch: An uneven response, 2.2 dB standard deviation from target.
Buy the BQEYZ Autumn. It is rated higher for sound quality, and saving $4.01 with the Pula Anvil114 does not make up for the sound-quality gap.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.
The median of 11 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 71 with a 2.42 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural.
HiFiGo $199.00 eBay
A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 70 against the Harman target.
HiFiGo $194.99 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| BQEYZ Autumn | Pula Anvil114 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $199.00 | $194.99 |
| Ranked | #567 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #681 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 71 (median of 11 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 70 (median of 10 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.42 dB standard deviation | 2.18 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | +0.05 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.36 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-4.4 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-2.2 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired (3.5mm / 4.4mm) |
| Driver Type | Dynamic | Tribrid |
| Drivers | 1 x 13mm dynamic | 1 Dynamic, 4 Balanced Armature, 1 Bone Conduction |
| Impedance | 46 ohms | - |
| Sensitivity | 110 dB | - |
| Frequency Response | 7Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) | - |
| Built-in Microphone | No | - |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the BQEYZ Autumn from arn, bedrock, bryaudioreviews, fahryst, hbb, ianfann, nymz, precog, rg, riz and superreview; the Pula Anvil114 from atechreviews, boizoff, elrics, iemocean, jaytiss, silicagel, sl0the, soundcheck39, soundignity, superreview and tonedeafmonk, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for BQEYZ Autumn: