Tipsy M1 Review: Ranked #1053 of 1369

Last updated: October 17, 2026

The Tipsy M1 ranks #1053 out of 1369 total In-Ear Headphones for sound quality. See all Headphones rankings for every top pick.

Brand: Tipsy

Prices on this page were last checked October 17, 2026 at 6:04 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

#1053 Tipsy M1: $99.99 Amazon $99.99 eBay

Newer model: the TIPSY M3, ranked higher, rated 3.6/5. See every T generation.

Pros: A published AutoEQ preset corrects its response toward the Harman target, so a few minutes of EQ setup closes most of the gap.

Cons: Treble about 5 dB below target from 3 to 10 kHz, which can sound dull or veiled next to brighter headphones. An uneven response, 2.6 dB standard deviation from target.

Is the Tipsy M1 right for you?

Buy it if

  • you are sensitive to bright or sharp treble (treble sits 5.3 dB below target).
  • you want sub-bass rumble that reaches down to 20 Hz.
  • you are happy to use EQ: our preset lifts its Harman match by about 17 points.

Skip it if

  • you want the best value: the higher-rated EPZ G10 costs about $76 less.
BackClosed
ConnectionWired
Deviation From Target2.59 dB standard deviation
Driver TypeDynamic
Drivers1 x 10mm dual-chamber dynamic driver (handmade bamboo fiber diaphragm)
Form FactorIn-ear
Frequency Response20Hz - 20kHz
Harman Preference Score63 (median of 3 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)
Impedance24 ohms
Sensitivity106 dB
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+1.1 dB at 30 Hz)
Tonal Tilt-0.95 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Weight0 lbs (3.5 g) (per earbud)

EQ Presets

Harman target

Set a preamp of -5.9 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 3 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Harman match with this EQ: 80 out of 100, up from 63.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz-0.3 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz+1.9 dB0.70
Peak1,783 Hz-2.7 dB3.02
Peak3,224 Hz+2.8 dB4.62
Peak5,016 Hz+5.6 dB1.30

Neutral target

Set a preamp of -5.9 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 3 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Neutral match with this EQ: 80 out of 100, up from 26.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz-8.9 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz+1.9 dB0.70
Peak1,784 Hz-2.7 dB3.03
Peak3,223 Hz+2.8 dB4.62
Peak5,016 Hz+5.6 dB1.30

Studio flat target

Set a preamp of -6.1 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 3 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Studio flat match with this EQ: 80 out of 100, up from 8.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz-11.2 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz+2.0 dB0.70
Peak30 Hz-0.9 dB1.63
Peak170 Hz-3.6 dB0.96
Peak655 Hz+1.5 dB2.56
Peak1,730 Hz-2.5 dB2.70
Peak2,820 Hz+1.6 dB6.00
Peak3,573 Hz+5.9 dB1.34
Peak5,817 Hz+4.0 dB6.00

Warm target

Set a preamp of -4.2 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 3 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Warm match with this EQ: 89 out of 100, up from 75.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
High shelf10,000 Hz-0.5 dB0.70
Peak171 Hz-1.5 dB1.39
Peak652 Hz+2.0 dB2.25
Peak1,841 Hz-3.2 dB3.01
Peak3,275 Hz+2.5 dB4.77
Peak5,423 Hz+4.1 dB1.44

Bass target

Set a preamp of -5.9 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 3 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Bass match with this EQ: 82 out of 100, up from 70.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz+3.4 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz+1.9 dB0.70
Peak1,783 Hz-2.7 dB3.02
Peak3,224 Hz+2.8 dB4.62
Peak5,016 Hz+5.6 dB1.30

Bright target

Set a preamp of -6.4 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 3 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Bright match with this EQ: 71 out of 100, up from 13.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz-8.9 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz+2.0 dB0.70
Peak158 Hz-1.7 dB1.19
Peak632 Hz+1.6 dB2.01
Peak1,848 Hz-3.2 dB2.29
Peak3,807 Hz+6.0 dB1.35
Peak5,575 Hz+3.7 dB4.46

V-shaped target

Set a preamp of -6.4 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 3 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted V-shaped match with this EQ: 67 out of 100, up from 55.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz+4.1 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz+2.0 dB0.70
Peak530 Hz+1.8 dB1.59
Peak1,206 Hz-1.2 dB4.55
Peak1,805 Hz-3.1 dB2.05
Peak3,573 Hz+6.0 dB1.30
Peak5,502 Hz+4.0 dB3.89

Frequency Response

How the Tipsy M1 measures across the audible range, against the Harman in-ear target that most listeners prefer in blind tests. Where the line sits above the target that range sounds louder (more bass, brighter treble), below it quieter. The curve is the median of 3 independent measurements, so one odd sample or rig cannot skew it, and both lines are shifted so their 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB.

Tipsy M1Harman target
Measured frequency response of the Tipsy M1-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: median of 3 measurements from the squig.link databases of jaytiss, pw and tdl. Thanks to each of them for publishing their work.

Head-to-Head Comparisons

4 comparisons

More Tipsy headphones →