Short answer: the HIDIZS My LIN. It ranks #1011 of 1369 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 3.2/5, at $99; the Tipsy M1 ranks #1053, rated 3.1/5, and costs $99.99, so there is not much of a tradeoff to weigh.
What the HIDIZS My LIN does well: About 4 dB more bass than the Harman target below 150 Hz, for listeners who want a fuller low end. Watch for: An uneven response, 2.5 dB standard deviation from target.
The case for the Tipsy M1: A published AutoEQ preset corrects its response toward the Harman target, so a few minutes of EQ setup closes most of the gap. The tradeoff: Treble about 5 dB below target from 3 to 10 kHz, which can sound dull or veiled next to brighter headphones.
Buy the HIDIZS My LIN. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Tipsy M1 and costs less, which makes it the one to get unless you need something the other one does better.
Still deciding? The full Headphones rankings cover every ranked option.
About 4 dB more bass than the Harman target below 150 Hz, for listeners who want a fuller low end.
Hidizs $99.00 eBay
A published AutoEQ preset corrects its response toward the Harman target, so a few minutes of EQ setup closes most of the gap.
Amazon $99.99 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 17, 2026 at 6:04 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| HIDIZS My LIN | Tipsy M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $99.00 | $99.99 |
| Ranked | #1011 of 1369 in In-Ear Headphones | #1053 of 1369 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 64 (median of 7 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 63 (median of 3 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.52 dB standard deviation | 2.59 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.88 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.95 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+1.9 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+1.1 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Hybrid | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 1 DD + 1 BA (1 x 10.2mm dual-magnetic dual-cavity dynamic driver with PU+PEEK DLC diaphragm, 1 x Hidizs Silvercore balanced armature) | 1 x 10mm dual-chamber dynamic driver (handmade bamboo fiber diaphragm) |
| Impedance | 17 ohms | 24 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 111 dB | 106 dB |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 40kHz | 20Hz - 20kHz |
| Weight | 0 lbs (13 g) (per earbud) | 0 lbs (3.5 g) (per earbud) |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the HIDIZS My LIN from audioamigo, jaytiss, kuping-sensi, samreviews, soundcheck39, soundignity and tdl; the Tipsy M1 from jaytiss, pw and tdl, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for HIDIZS My LIN: