Tipsy Dunmer Pro 4 Review: Ranked #753 of 1253

Last updated: October 16, 2026

The Tipsy Dunmer Pro 4 ranks #753 out of 1253 total In-Ear Headphones for sound quality. See all Headphones rankings for every top pick.

Brand: Tipsy

Prices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Tipsy Dunmer Pro 4 - ranked #753 of 1253 In-Ear Headphones · Editor's rating 3.6/5

#753 Tipsy Dunmer Pro 4: $360 eBay

Pros: A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 69 against the Harman target.

Cons: An uneven response, 2.3 dB standard deviation from target.

Is the Tipsy Dunmer Pro 4 right for you?

Buy it if

  • you want sub-bass rumble that reaches down to 20 Hz.
  • you are happy to use EQ: our preset lifts its Harman match by about 17 points.

Skip it if

  • you want the best value: the higher-rated EPZ G10 costs about $336 less.
BackClosed
ConnectionWired (3.5mm)
Deviation From Target2.32 dB standard deviation
Driver TypeHybrid
Drivers1 Dynamic, 3 Balanced Armature
Form FactorIn-ear
Harman Preference Score69 (median of 3 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-2.8 dB at 30 Hz)
Tonal Tilt+0.56 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)

EQ Presets

Harman target

Set a preamp of -3.3 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 3 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Harman match with this EQ: 86 out of 100, up from 69.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz+2.1 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz-6.0 dB0.70
Peak24 Hz+1.3 dB0.94
Peak141 Hz-3.5 dB0.77
Peak277 Hz-1.1 dB2.45
Peak770 Hz+1.7 dB2.51
Peak2,652 Hz-4.2 dB1.92
Peak4,361 Hz+2.3 dB6.00
Peak7,636 Hz-2.5 dB6.00

Neutral target

Set a preamp of -1.5 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 3 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Neutral match with this EQ: 87 out of 100, up from 57.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz-6.4 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz-6.0 dB0.70
Peak141 Hz-3.6 dB0.69
Peak760 Hz+1.8 dB2.31
Peak2,654 Hz-4.3 dB1.95
Peak4,361 Hz+2.2 dB6.00
Peak7,636 Hz-2.5 dB6.00

Studio flat target

Set a preamp of -1.1 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 3 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Studio flat match with this EQ: 85 out of 100, up from 42.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz-9.0 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz-0.8 dB0.70
Peak63 Hz+0.7 dB0.73
Peak141 Hz-5.2 dB0.71
Peak290 Hz-1.5 dB2.13
Peak790 Hz+1.6 dB2.89
Peak3,148 Hz-0.6 dB0.68
Peak4,346 Hz+2.4 dB6.00
Peak5,932 Hz-2.0 dB0.53

Warm target

Set a preamp of -3.5 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 3 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Warm match with this EQ: 88 out of 100, up from 62.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz+2.4 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz-6.0 dB0.70
Peak24 Hz+1.2 dB1.18
Peak141 Hz-3.4 dB0.85
Peak266 Hz-1.1 dB2.60
Peak809 Hz+2.3 dB1.85
Peak2,612 Hz-1.3 dB4.29
Peak3,148 Hz-4.4 dB0.77
Peak4,326 Hz+3.1 dB6.00
Peak8,000 Hz-4.3 dB2.72

Bass target

Set a preamp of -6.1 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 3 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Bass match with this EQ: 86 out of 100, up from 54.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz+5.4 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz-6.0 dB0.70
Peak41 Hz+1.1 dB0.97
Peak141 Hz-3.3 dB0.87
Peak266 Hz-1.4 dB2.45
Peak782 Hz+1.7 dB2.69
Peak2,640 Hz-4.2 dB1.82
Peak4,360 Hz+2.3 dB6.00
Peak7,639 Hz-2.5 dB6.00

Bright target

Set a preamp of -3.7 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 3 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Bright match with this EQ: 84 out of 100, up from 49.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz-6.5 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz-3.5 dB0.70
Peak141 Hz-3.6 dB0.70
Peak761 Hz+1.7 dB2.38
Peak2,575 Hz-3.7 dB2.04
Peak4,458 Hz+4.4 dB6.00
Peak6,195 Hz+3.3 dB6.00

V-shaped target

Set a preamp of -5.7 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 3 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted V-shaped match with this EQ: 83 out of 100, up from 58.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz+5.7 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz-2.3 dB0.70
Peak141 Hz-2.0 dB1.04
Peak700 Hz+1.3 dB2.37
Peak2,545 Hz-3.0 dB1.86
Peak4,463 Hz+5.4 dB6.00
Peak6,119 Hz+3.9 dB6.00
Peak7,435 Hz+1.7 dB6.00

Frequency Response

How the Tipsy Dunmer Pro 4 measures across the audible range, against the Harman in-ear target that most listeners prefer in blind tests. Where the line sits above the target that range sounds louder (more bass, brighter treble), below it quieter. The curve is the median of 3 independent measurements, so one odd sample or rig cannot skew it, and both lines are shifted so their 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB.

Tipsy Dunmer Pro 4Harman target
Measured frequency response of the Tipsy Dunmer Pro 4-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: median of 3 measurements from the squig.link databases of atechreviews, jaytiss and pw. Thanks to each of them for publishing their work.

Head-to-Head Comparisons

1 comparisons

More Tipsy headphones →