Short answer: the CrinEar Reference. It ranks #635 of 1291 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 3.7/5, at $349.99; the Tipsy Dunmer Pro 4 ranks #755, rated 3.6/5, and costs $360, so there is not much of a tradeoff to weigh.
What the CrinEar Reference does well: A very even tilt: the median of 30 measurements has a near zero tonal tilt and the mids hold close to target, giving a relaxed, inoffensive presentation. The tradeoff: Sub-bass falls about 5 dB short at 30 Hz and bass about 2 dB short, so it lacks the low end weight its two dynamic drivers suggest.
Why pick the Tipsy Dunmer Pro 4: A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 69 against the Harman target. Watch for: An uneven response, 2.3 dB standard deviation from target.
Buy the CrinEar Reference. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Tipsy Dunmer Pro 4 and costs less, so it is the default pick unless a specific strength of the other one matters more to you.
Want more options? Browse the full Headphones rankings.
A very even tilt: the median of 30 measurements has a near zero tonal tilt and the mids hold close to target, giving a relaxed, inoffensive presentation.
Amazon $349.99 eBay
A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 69 against the Harman target.
e-earphone (JP) eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| CrinEar Reference | Tipsy Dunmer Pro 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $349.99 | $360 |
| Ranked | #635 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #755 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Connection | Wired | Wired (3.5mm) |
| Driver Type | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Drivers | 2 x 10mm dynamic + 3 x balanced armature | 1 Dynamic, 3 Balanced Armature |
| Impedance | 16 ohms | - |
| Frequency Response | 2Hz - 44kHz (Manufacturer specified) | - |
| Harman Preference Score | 70 (median of 30 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 69 (median of 3 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.12 dB standard deviation | 2.32 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.02 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | +0.56 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-5.0 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-2.8 dB at 30 Hz) |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the CrinEar Reference from aden, aftersound, animagus, atechreviews, audioamigo, bassaudio, bloomaudio, boizoff, breampike, dentreviews, dl, doltonius, dvewlsh, elrics, faxepremium, fernandagunsan, flare, hbb, hobbytalk, iemocean, jaraba, jaytiss, lestat, lumerion, practiphile, precog, soundignity, superreview, tdl and tonedeafmonk; the Tipsy Dunmer Pro 4 from atechreviews, jaytiss and pw, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
More top alternatives to CrinEar Reference: