TRN TA4 Review: Ranked #905 of 1369

Last updated: October 17, 2026

The TRN TA4 ranks #905 out of 1369 total In-Ear Headphones for sound quality. See all Headphones rankings for every top pick.

Brand: TRN

Prices on this page were last checked October 17, 2026 at 6:04 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

#905 TRN TA4: 6.00 TRN eBay

Pros: A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 66 against the Harman target.

Cons: Treble about 3 dB below target from 3 to 10 kHz, which can sound dull or veiled next to brighter headphones. An uneven response, 2.8 dB standard deviation from target.

Is the TRN TA4 right for you?

Buy it if

  • you are sensitive to bright or sharp treble (treble sits 3.3 dB below target).
  • you are happy to use EQ: our preset lifts its Harman match by about 24 points.
BackClosed
ConnectionWired
Deviation From Target2.82 dB standard deviation
Driver TypeHybrid
Drivers2 dynamic drivers + 2 balanced armatures (10mm beryllium DD + 6mm titanium DD + dual Knowles 33518 BA)
Form FactorIn-ear
Frequency Response20Hz - 40kHz
Harman Preference Score66 (median of 4 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)
Impedance20 ohms
Sensitivity105 dB
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-3.8 dB at 30 Hz)
Tonal Tilt-0.21 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)

EQ Presets

Harman target

Set a preamp of -6.4 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 4 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Harman match with this EQ: 90 out of 100, up from 66.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz+2.5 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz-3.4 dB0.70
Peak23 Hz+2.5 dB1.95
Peak174 Hz-3.9 dB0.72
Peak719 Hz+1.4 dB2.05
Peak1,775 Hz-2.3 dB3.60
Peak3,121 Hz+3.9 dB5.03
Peak5,016 Hz+5.7 dB1.06
Peak7,462 Hz-3.8 dB5.01

Neutral target

Set a preamp of -6.4 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 4 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Neutral match with this EQ: 92 out of 100, up from 42.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz-6.0 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz-3.4 dB0.70
Peak23 Hz+2.1 dB2.54
Peak73 Hz-1.3 dB1.77
Peak174 Hz-4.0 dB0.65
Peak696 Hz+1.5 dB1.77
Peak1,780 Hz-2.3 dB3.69
Peak3,120 Hz+3.9 dB5.01
Peak5,016 Hz+5.7 dB1.06
Peak7,462 Hz-3.8 dB5.02

Studio flat target

Set a preamp of -6.3 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 4 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Studio flat match with this EQ: 90 out of 100, up from 23.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz-8.6 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz+1.2 dB0.70
Peak168 Hz-5.8 dB0.69
Peak1,747 Hz-2.3 dB3.67
Peak2,605 Hz+1.4 dB6.00
Peak3,148 Hz+6.0 dB1.40
Peak5,518 Hz+3.7 dB4.60
Peak7,472 Hz-1.7 dB6.00

Warm target

Set a preamp of -5.3 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 4 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Warm match with this EQ: 92 out of 100, up from 70.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz+2.8 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz-6.0 dB0.70
Peak23 Hz+2.5 dB2.07
Peak174 Hz-3.7 dB0.73
Peak719 Hz+1.7 dB1.95
Peak1,813 Hz-2.7 dB3.62
Peak3,001 Hz+1.9 dB6.00
Peak3,807 Hz+4.2 dB1.49
Peak5,720 Hz+3.5 dB6.00
Peak7,595 Hz-3.3 dB6.00

Bass target

Set a preamp of -6.4 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 4 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Bass match with this EQ: 88 out of 100, up from 58.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz+5.3 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz-3.4 dB0.70
Peak38 Hz+1.2 dB1.55
Peak179 Hz-3.8 dB0.86
Peak744 Hz+1.3 dB2.47
Peak1,769 Hz-2.3 dB3.48
Peak3,122 Hz+3.9 dB5.07
Peak5,016 Hz+5.7 dB1.06
Peak7,462 Hz-3.8 dB5.01

Bright target

Set a preamp of -6.5 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 4 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Bright match with this EQ: 85 out of 100, up from 30.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz-6.0 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz+0.3 dB0.70
Peak23 Hz+2.0 dB2.47
Peak73 Hz-1.2 dB1.78
Peak174 Hz-4.0 dB0.61
Peak676 Hz+1.4 dB1.73
Peak1,855 Hz-3.2 dB2.72
Peak3,354 Hz+6.0 dB1.19
Peak5,491 Hz+4.3 dB3.60

V-shaped target

Set a preamp of -6.5 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 4 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted V-shaped match with this EQ: 82 out of 100, up from 56.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz+5.6 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz+1.3 dB0.70
Peak174 Hz-2.4 dB1.00
Peak1,741 Hz-2.9 dB2.15
Peak3,354 Hz+6.0 dB1.12
Peak5,456 Hz+4.0 dB3.57

Frequency Response

How the TRN TA4 measures across the audible range, against the Harman in-ear target that most listeners prefer in blind tests. Where the line sits above the target that range sounds louder (more bass, brighter treble), below it quieter. The curve is the median of 4 independent measurements, so one odd sample or rig cannot skew it, and both lines are shifted so their 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB.

TRN TA4Harman target
Measured frequency response of the TRN TA4-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: median of 4 measurements from the squig.link databases of arn, eplv, ianfann and tonedeafmonk. Thanks to each of them for publishing their work.

Head-to-Head Comparisons

4 comparisons

More TRN headphones →