CCA Hydro Review: Ranked #960 of 1369

Last updated: October 17, 2026

The CCA Hydro ranks #960 out of 1369 total In-Ear Headphones for sound quality. See all Headphones rankings for every top pick.

Brand: CCA

Prices on this page were last checked October 17, 2026 at 6:04 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

#960 CCA Hydro: 24.99 Linsoul eBay

Pros: About 3 dB more bass than the Harman target below 150 Hz, for listeners who want a fuller low end.

Cons: An uneven response, 2.5 dB standard deviation from target.

Is the CCA Hydro right for you?

Buy it if

  • you like extra bass (about +3 dB below 150 Hz versus the target).
  • you want sub-bass rumble that reaches down to 20 Hz.
  • you are happy to use EQ: our preset lifts its Harman match by about 27 points.

Skip it if

  • you want the best value: the higher-rated TRN MT3 costs about $7 less.
BackClosed
ConnectionWired
Deviation From Target2.54 dB standard deviation
Driver TypeHybrid
Drivers10 drivers (2 dynamic drivers + 8 balanced armatures)
Form FactorIn-ear
Frequency Response20Hz - 40kHz
Harman Preference Score65 (median of 4 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)
Impedance15-20 ohms
Sensitivity102 dB
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.3 dB at 30 Hz)
Tonal Tilt-0.37 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)

EQ Presets

Harman target

Set a preamp of -1.3 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 4 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Harman match with this EQ: 92 out of 100, up from 65.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz-1.4 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz-5.5 dB0.70
Peak23 Hz+2.9 dB1.51
Peak73 Hz-1.2 dB2.97
Peak137 Hz-7.0 dB0.91
Peak230 Hz-1.5 dB3.65
Peak555 Hz+1.8 dB1.93
Peak1,670 Hz-1.1 dB1.23
Peak5,917 Hz+1.8 dB6.00
Peak7,751 Hz-2.3 dB6.00

Neutral target

Set a preamp of -1.2 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 4 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Neutral match with this EQ: 93 out of 100, up from 31.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz-9.9 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz-5.5 dB0.70
Peak23 Hz+2.4 dB1.71
Peak69 Hz-1.1 dB3.06
Peak131 Hz-7.0 dB0.85
Peak226 Hz-1.5 dB3.57
Peak552 Hz+1.8 dB1.90
Peak1,670 Hz-1.1 dB1.24
Peak5,917 Hz+1.8 dB6.00
Peak7,751 Hz-2.3 dB6.00

Studio flat target

Set a preamp of -2.2 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 4 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Studio flat match with this EQ: 89 out of 100, up from 15.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz-11.7 dB0.70
Peak150 Hz-8.8 dB0.95
Peak244 Hz-1.4 dB3.92
Peak607 Hz+1.6 dB2.04
Peak1,396 Hz-1.1 dB3.73
Peak2,485 Hz+2.2 dB4.36
Peak4,628 Hz-1.2 dB4.41
Peak7,736 Hz-2.7 dB3.02

Warm target

Set a preamp of -1.6 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 4 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Warm match with this EQ: 91 out of 100, up from 65.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz-1.1 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz-6.0 dB0.70
Peak23 Hz+2.8 dB1.55
Peak72 Hz-1.2 dB2.98
Peak134 Hz-6.8 dB0.93
Peak227 Hz-1.6 dB3.61
Peak587 Hz+2.1 dB1.63
Peak1,556 Hz-1.1 dB2.44
Peak6,887 Hz-2.7 dB0.40

Bass target

Set a preamp of -5.3 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 4 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Bass match with this EQ: 93 out of 100, up from 66.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz+2.4 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz-5.5 dB0.70
Peak23 Hz+3.1 dB1.45
Peak75 Hz-1.3 dB2.95
Peak139 Hz-6.9 dB0.93
Peak231 Hz-1.5 dB3.67
Peak556 Hz+1.8 dB1.94
Peak1,670 Hz-1.1 dB1.23
Peak5,918 Hz+1.8 dB6.00
Peak7,750 Hz-2.3 dB6.00

Bright target

Set a preamp of -4.3 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 4 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted Bright match with this EQ: 92 out of 100, up from 24.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz-10.0 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz-1.6 dB0.70
Peak23 Hz+2.5 dB1.69
Peak69 Hz-1.1 dB2.99
Peak132 Hz-7.0 dB0.86
Peak227 Hz-1.5 dB3.57
Peak551 Hz+1.8 dB1.90
Peak1,495 Hz-1.4 dB2.47
Peak5,608 Hz+4.3 dB2.53

V-shaped target

Set a preamp of -5.9 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by Speaker Ranking from the median of 4 squig.link measurements, in the filter layout AutoEQ uses. Predicted V-shaped match with this EQ: 90 out of 100, up from 68.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz+3.1 dB0.70
High shelf10,000 Hz-0.4 dB0.70
Peak23 Hz+2.9 dB1.53
Peak71 Hz-1.2 dB3.09
Peak128 Hz-5.8 dB1.00
Peak218 Hz-1.5 dB3.60
Peak489 Hz+2.1 dB2.08
Peak1,363 Hz-1.6 dB2.93
Peak5,535 Hz+4.7 dB2.11

Frequency Response

How the CCA Hydro measures across the audible range, against the Harman in-ear target that most listeners prefer in blind tests. Where the line sits above the target that range sounds louder (more bass, brighter treble), below it quieter. The curve is the median of 4 independent measurements, so one odd sample or rig cannot skew it, and both lines are shifted so their 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB.

CCA HydroHarman target
Measured frequency response of the CCA Hydro-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: median of 4 measurements from the squig.link databases of audioamigo, obodio, pw and superreview. Thanks to each of them for publishing their work.

Head-to-Head Comparisons

3 comparisons

More CCA headphones →