Short answer: the ZiiGaat Horizon. It ranks #332 of 1291 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 4.1/5, at $329; the NiceHCK Himalaya ranks #404, rated 4.0/5, at $329. With prices this close, go by the sound-quality ranking rather than the cost.
The case for the ZiiGaat Horizon: The median of 19 hobbyist measurements gives it a very good Harman preference score of 75 with a 1.64 dB spread. Watch for: Presence sits about 4.9 dB low with a 7.3 dB dip near 5.9 kHz, so vocals and instruments lose some bite.
The case for the NiceHCK Himalaya: The median of 4 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 74 with a 2.05 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.9 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural. Watch for: A 4.2 dB peak near 7.9 kHz can make cymbals and sibilance sound sharp.
Buy the ZiiGaat Horizon. It is rated higher for sound quality than the NiceHCK Himalaya at the same price, so it is the default pick unless a specific strength of the other one matters more to you.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.
The median of 19 hobbyist measurements gives it a very good Harman preference score of 75 with a 1.64 dB spread.
Amazon $329.00 eBay
The median of 4 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 74 with a 2.05 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.9 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural.
Amazon $329.00 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| ZiiGaat Horizon | NiceHCK Himalaya | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $329.00 | $329.00 |
| Ranked | #332 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #404 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 75 (median of 19 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 74 (median of 4 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 1.64 dB standard deviation | 2.05 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.43 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.17 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-0.7 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-1.7 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Hybrid (1 dynamic + 2 balanced armature + 2 planar magnetic) | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 2 x balanced armature + 2 x planar magnetic | 1 x 10mm dynamic |
| Impedance | 24 ohms | 22 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 102 dB | 110 dB/mW |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 35kHz (Manufacturer specified) | - |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the ZiiGaat Horizon from aden, aftersound, arn, atechreviews, audioamigo, bassaudio, bloomaudio, boizoff, cqtek, flare, hbb, jaytiss, joycesreview, practiphile, pw, silicagel, sl0the, soundcheck39 and superreview; the NiceHCK Himalaya from atechreviews, hu-fi, superreview and tonedeafmonk, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for ZiiGaat Horizon: