Short answer: choose between the Vue Audiotechnik H-8 and RCF ART 708-A MK5 for the deployment, not from the automatic ranking alone. Their driver format, power requirements, coverage, bass reach, output capability, and control features determine which is the more practical PA for a particular room or system.
The case for the Vue Audiotechnik H-8. Low-quality vendor data shows a 4.3 ideal-subwoofer preference score, continuing the h-Class’s Truextent beryllium-diaphragm compression driver in a compact cabinet with a 100° x 50° horn and fanless 2-channel amplification.
The case for the RCF ART 708-A MK5. A compact, affordable RCF with a 1.4-inch compression driver, 128dB claimed output and FiRPHASE processing, well suited to buyers who plan to cross to a subwoofer and do not need app control. At 10.4kg it is easy to carry.
Important trade-offs. The local low-quality manufacturer data has no computed preference score, making its measured tonal position uncertain.
Buy the Vue Audiotechnik H-8 when its stated format, coverage, and system features fit the job better.
Buy the RCF ART 708-A MK5 when its stated output, control, and deployment strengths better match the system.
If sound quality matters at all to you, skip the RCF ART 708-A MK5. It ranks near the bottom of the 15 8-inch two-way powered pa speakers, so look higher up the list instead.

Specifications Side By Side
| Vue Audiotechnik H-8 | RCF ART 708-A MK5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3,800.00 | $499.00 |
| Ranked | #10 of 15 in 8-Inch Two-Way Powered PA Speakers | #12 of 15 in 8-Inch Two-Way Powered PA Speakers |
| Configuration | Active 2-way bass-reflex PA speaker | Active 2-way bass-reflex PA speaker |
| Drivers | 8" woofer, beryllium-diaphragm compression driver | 8" woofer, 1.4" compression driver |
| Frequency Response | 75Hz - 21kHz (±2.5dB, manufacturer specified); 60Hz - 26kHz (-10dB) | 60Hz - 20kHz (manufacturer specified) |
| Dimensions | 18.1"H x 11.3"W x 11.9"D (460 x 286 x 303 mm) | 18.9"H x 11.5"W x 10.9"D (480 x 291 x 276 mm) |
| Inputs | XLR analog/AES input with XLR loop output | XLR and 1/4-inch jack input; XLR output |
| Amplifier Power | 315W long-term (275W LF + 40W HF); 900W burst (600W LF + 300W HF) | 1400W peak (1000W LF + 400W HF) |
| Cabinet Material | Multi-ply birch hardwood | PP composite |
| Rigging | Pole mount and integrated hanging points | 2 x M10 inserts; 35mm pole mount |
| Network Control | Ethernet/IP remote monitoring and control | - |
| Coverage | 100° x 40° | 90° x 70° |
| Maximum SPL | 122dB peak (manufacturer specified) | 128dB peak (manufacturer specified) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 77.5Hz (measured, vendor Spinorama data) | 75Hz (measured, vendor Spinorama data) |
| DSP | Yes | Yes, FiRPHASE, EQ, limiting and protection |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Weight | 51.2 lbs / 23.22 kg | 22.9 lbs / 10.4 kg |
| Crossover Frequency | - | 1600Hz |
Related Speaker Comparisons
A few more comparisons worth a look in the same class:
- Martin Audio CDD8 vs Audiofocus VENU 8a
- Axiom ED80P vs Martin Audio CDD8
- Vue Audiotechnik A-8 vs FBT J8A
- LD Systems Stinger 8-A-G3 vs Vue Audiotechnik H-8
- FBT J8A vs Vue Audiotechnik H-8
Prices on this page were last checked September 7, 2026 at 7:47 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Vue Audiotechnik H-8: $3,800.00 eBay
Pros: Low-quality vendor data shows a 4.3 ideal-subwoofer preference score, continuing the h-Class’s Truextent beryllium-diaphragm compression driver in a compact cabinet with a 100° x 50° horn and fanless 2-channel amplification.
Cons: At 23.22kg and roughly $3,800 this is an unusually heavy and expensive 8-inch box, aimed at rental and touring use rather than casual portability.
Full Vue Audiotechnik H-8 review and specifications →
| Amplifier Power | 315W long-term (275W LF + 40W HF); 900W burst (600W LF + 300W HF) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 77.5Hz (measured, vendor Spinorama data) |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Cabinet Material | Multi-ply birch hardwood |
| Configuration | Active 2-way bass-reflex PA speaker |
| Coverage | 100° x 40° |
| DSP | Yes |
| Dimensions | 18.1"H x 11.3"W x 11.9"D (460 x 286 x 303 mm) |
| Drivers | 8" woofer, beryllium-diaphragm compression driver |
| Frequency Response | 75Hz - 21kHz (±2.5dB, manufacturer specified); 60Hz - 26kHz (-10dB) |
| Inputs | XLR analog/AES input with XLR loop output |
| Maximum SPL | 122dB peak (manufacturer specified) |
| Network Control | Ethernet/IP remote monitoring and control |
| Rigging | Pole mount and integrated hanging points |
| Weight | 51.2 lbs / 23.22 kg |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
RCF ART 708-A MK5: $499.00 Amazon B&H Photo Video Guitar Center eBay
Pros: A compact, affordable RCF with a 1.4-inch compression driver, 128dB claimed output and FiRPHASE processing, well suited to buyers who plan to cross to a subwoofer and do not need app control. At 10.4kg it is easy to carry.
Cons: The local low-quality manufacturer data has no computed preference score, making its measured tonal position uncertain.
Full RCF ART 708-A MK5 review and specifications →
| Amplifier Power | 1400W peak (1000W LF + 400W HF) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 75Hz (measured, vendor Spinorama data) |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Cabinet Material | PP composite |
| Configuration | Active 2-way bass-reflex PA speaker |
| Coverage | 90° x 70° |
| Crossover Frequency | 1600Hz |
| DSP | Yes, FiRPHASE, EQ, limiting and protection |
| Dimensions | 18.9"H x 11.5"W x 10.9"D (480 x 291 x 276 mm) |
| Drivers | 8" woofer, 1.4" compression driver |
| Frequency Response | 60Hz - 20kHz (manufacturer specified) |
| Inputs | XLR and 1/4-inch jack input; XLR output |
| Maximum SPL | 128dB peak (manufacturer specified) |
| Rigging | 2 x M10 inserts; 35mm pole mount |
| Weight | 22.9 lbs / 10.4 kg |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons

