Short answer: the Turtlebox Ranger. It ranks #65 of 166 medium speakers by sound quality, rated 3.5/5, at $250. The Marshall Emberton III ranks #123, rated 2.7/5, at $129.99, $120.01 cheaper, not enough of a saving to outweigh the sound-quality gap.
The Turtlebox Ranger is the better-sounding option. Smoother frequency response than the other Turtlebox speakers. The tradeoff: Bass sounds kind of thuddy and isn’t as deep as higher ranked speakers.
The Marshall Emberton III is the longer-running, lighter option. 30 hour battery life: among the best in its class; a 20 min quick-charge gives 4 hours. It is rated for 32 hours of battery against 12 for the Turtlebox Ranger. At 1.5 lbs (673 g) it weighs much less than the Turtlebox Ranger at 2.4 lbs (1.09 kg). It has an adjustable EQ, which the Turtlebox Ranger lacks. Watch for: Strange unnatural echo-like sound coloration, bass not as deep as competitors.
Buy the Turtlebox Ranger. It is rated higher for sound quality, and the $120.01 you would save on the Marshall Emberton III does not close the gap.
Want more options? Browse the full Portable Bluetooth rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| Turtlebox Ranger | Marshall Emberton III | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $250.00 | $129.99 |
| Ranked | #65 of 166 in Medium Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers | #123 of 166 in Medium Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers |
| Battery Life | 12+ hours (Manufacturer specified) | 32 hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Dimensions | 9.5” x 3.1” x 3.1” (241 x 80 x 80 mm) | 6.3” x 2.7” x 3” (160 x 68 x 76 mm) |
| Drivers | 2” (51mm) woofers | 2x 2” full-range cone drivers + 2x 2” passive radiators |
| IP Rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Party Mode | Yes (Turtlebox Party Mode) | Yes (Marshall Stack) |
| Power Bank | Yes (USB-C) | No |
| Stereo | No | Yes |
| Omnidirectional | No | Yes |
| TWS | Yes | No |
| Weight | 2.4 lbs (1089 g) | 1.5 lbs (673 g) |
| Digital Aux Input | No | No |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC (inferred; additional codecs unverified) | SBC |
| App | No | Yes |
| EQ | No | Yes (3 presets via app) |
| Power Input | USB-C | USB-C |
| Aux Input | No | No |
| Strap | No | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | - | 62Hz |
| Built-in Microphone | - | Yes |
| Amplifier Power | - | 20W |
Related Speaker Comparisons
How Turtlebox Ranger compares with other leading options:
- Turtlebox Ranger vs EarFun Uboom L
- Turtlebox Ranger vs Soundcore Motion 300
- Turtlebox Ranger vs Soundcore Motion+
- Turtlebox Ranger vs Soundcore Boost “upgraded” 2021
- Denon Envaya DSB-250BT vs Turtlebox Ranger
Prices on this page were last checked October 9, 2026 at 8:01 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Turtlebox Ranger: $250.00 Amazon eBay
Same family: the Turtlebox Cub (smaller model, rated 3/5), the Turtlebox Gen 3 (larger model, rated 2.1/5) and the Turtlebox Grande (larger model, rated 2.6/5). See every Turtlebox generation.
Pros: Smoother frequency response than the other Turtlebox speakers. Has magnets for attaching it to things. Appears to be quite tough
Cons: Bass sounds kind of thuddy and isn’t as deep as higher ranked speakers. Overpriced. Heavy for the size, likely due to the toughness
Full Turtlebox Ranger review and specifications →
| Released | Feb 2025 (1 year ago) |
|---|---|
| App | No |
| Aux Input | No |
| Battery Life | 12+ hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC (inferred; additional codecs unverified) |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.4 |
| Digital Aux Input | No |
| Dimensions | 9.5” x 3.1” x 3.1” (241 x 80 x 80 mm) |
| Drivers | 2” (51mm) woofers |
| EQ | No |
| IP Rating | IP67 |
| Omnidirectional | No |
| Party Mode | Yes (Turtlebox Party Mode) |
| Power Bank | Yes (USB-C) |
| Power Input | USB-C |
| Stereo | No |
| Strap | No |
| TWS | Yes |
| Weight | 2.4 lbs (1089 g) |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Turtlebox Ranger vs Bogasing M5
- Turtlebox Ranger vs JBL Charge 4
- Turtlebox Ranger vs Soundcore 3
- Turtlebox Ranger vs Tribit Stormbox Flow
- Turtlebox Ranger vs Bose Soundlink Revolve
- Turtlebox Ranger vs Bose Soundlink Mini 2
- Turtlebox Ranger vs Sonos Play
- Turtlebox Ranger vs Bose Soundlink Mini
- See all 111 comparisons
Marshall Emberton III: $129.99 Amazon eBay
Older model: the Marshall Emberton II (ranked lower, rated 2.7/5). See every Marshall Portable Speakers generation.
Same family: the Marshall Willen II (smaller model, rated 4/5), the Marshall Middleton II (larger model, rated 4.1/5), the Marshall Stockwell III (larger model, rated 3/5) and the Marshall Kilburn III (larger model, rated 3.8/5).
Pros: 30 hour battery life: among the best in its class; a 20 min quick-charge gives 4 hours. IP67 rated, durable rubbery build using 50% recycled plastic. Measured bass extension of 62Hz (-10dB).
Cons: Strange unnatural echo-like sound coloration, bass not as deep as competitors. Not technically a 360 speaker, only front and rear. Not very loud. Not really any different from the Marshall Emberton II except having the treble turned down a little bit.
Full Marshall Emberton III review and specifications →
| Released | Aug 2024 (2 years ago) |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | 20W |
| App | Yes |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 62Hz |
| Battery Life | 32 hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.3 |
| Built-in Microphone | Yes |
| Digital Aux Input | No |
| Dimensions | 6.3” x 2.7” x 3” (160 x 68 x 76 mm) |
| Drivers | 2x 2” full-range cone drivers + 2x 2” passive radiators |
| EQ | Yes (3 presets via app) |
| IP Rating | IP67 |
| Omnidirectional | Yes |
| Party Mode | Yes (Marshall Stack) |
| Power Bank | No |
| Power Input | USB-C |
| Stereo | Yes |
| Strap | No |
| TWS | No |
| Weight | 1.5 lbs (673 g) |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Marshall Emberton III vs Bose SoundLink Color II
- Marshall Emberton III vs Marshall Emberton II
- Marshall Emberton III vs Yamaha True X Speaker 1A
- Marshall Emberton III vs Teufel Rockster Go
- Marshall Emberton III vs Sony SRS-XB20
- Marshall Emberton III vs Sony SRS-XB30
- Marshall Emberton III vs Tribit Stormbox
- Marshall Emberton III vs Soundcore Flare 2
- See all 140 comparisons