Short answer: the Tipsy Dunmer Pro, though neither ranks well in its class. It ranks #400 of 450 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 2.9/5, at $189. The Etymotic ER3XR ranks #402, rated 2.8/5, at $149.99, $39.01 cheaper, which does not close the gap in sound quality. Both are rated below 3.0/5 among the 450 in-ear headphones, so if sound quality matters, consider the Truthear Nova instead, ranked #2 at $169.99.
What the Tipsy Dunmer Pro does well: It packs a hybrid design with one 9.2mm dynamic driver and two balanced armatures, and at 16 ohms and 105 dB it plays from a phone without an amp. Watch for: In crinacle’s measurement it scores only 60.0 for preference, with a 3.26 dB deviation from target, so its response wanders far from what most listeners favor.
Why pick the Etymotic ER3XR: At 22 ohms and 102 dB/mW it runs fine from a phone, and its single balanced armature design keeps things simple. The tradeoff: In oratory1990’s measurement treble falls about 8.5 dB below target from 6 to 16 kHz, with a 13.1 dB dip near 11.9 kHz, so cymbals sound dull and fine detail fades.
Buy the Tipsy Dunmer Pro. It is rated higher for sound quality, and the $39.01 saving on the Etymotic ER3XR is not enough to make up the difference.
Still deciding? The full Headphones rankings cover every ranked option.
Specifications Side By Side
| Tipsy Dunmer Pro | Etymotic ER3XR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $189.00 | $149.99 |
| Ranked | #400 of 450 in In-Ear Headphones | #402 of 450 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 60 (measured by crinacle, via AutoEQ) | 59 (measured by oratory1990, via AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 3.26 dB standard deviation | 3.48 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | +0.42 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.22 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Hybrid (1 dynamic + 2 balanced armature) | Balanced armature |
| Drivers | 1 x 9.2mm dynamic + 2 x balanced armature | 1 x balanced armature |
| Impedance | 16 ohms | 22 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 105 dB | 102 dB/mW |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) | 20Hz - 16kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Built-in Microphone | No | No |
| Sub-bass Extension | - | Falls 6 dB below target at 30 Hz (-6.1 dB at 30 Hz) |
Related Headphone Comparisons
More top alternatives to Tipsy Dunmer Pro:
- Shanling ME200 vs Tipsy Dunmer Pro
- Muse HiFi Power vs Tipsy Dunmer Pro
- Etymotic ER3XR vs Master & Dynamic MW07
- Shure SE215 vs Etymotic ER3XR
- FiiO FA9 vs Jabra Evolve 75e
Prices on this page were last checked October 11, 2026 at 4:59 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Headphones In Full
Tipsy Dunmer Pro: $189.00 ShenzhenAudio eBay
Pros: It packs a hybrid design with one 9.2mm dynamic driver and two balanced armatures, and at 16 ohms and 105 dB it plays from a phone without an amp. It carries a higher rating than the Etymotic ER3XR, which sits at a similar price.
Cons: In crinacle’s measurement it scores only 60.0 for preference, with a 3.26 dB deviation from target, so its response wanders far from what most listeners favor. The FiiO FH7S earns a higher rating for not much more money.
Full Tipsy Dunmer Pro review and specifications →
| Released | Dec 2019 (6 years ago) |
|---|---|
| Back | Closed |
| Built-in Microphone | No |
| Connection | Wired |
| Deviation From Target | 3.26 dB standard deviation |
| Driver Type | Hybrid (1 dynamic + 2 balanced armature) |
| Drivers | 1 x 9.2mm dynamic + 2 x balanced armature |
| Form Factor | In-ear |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Harman Preference Score | 60 (measured by crinacle, via AutoEQ) |
| Impedance | 16 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 105 dB |
| Tonal Tilt | +0.42 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
EQ preset to match the Harman target
Set a preamp of -5.5 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by AutoEQ from its measured frequency response.
| Filter | Frequency | Gain | Q |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low shelf | 105 Hz | +8.2 dB | 0.70 |
| Peak | 931 Hz | +4.2 dB | 0.90 |
| Peak | 85 Hz | -5.4 dB | 0.24 |
| Peak | 2,613 Hz | +4.7 dB | 0.93 |
| Peak | 6,877 Hz | -4.0 dB | 0.44 |
| High shelf | 10,000 Hz | -5.3 dB | 0.70 |
| Peak | 9,730 Hz | +2.5 dB | 3.06 |
| Peak | 4,915 Hz | -2.7 dB | 4.63 |
| Peak | 6,318 Hz | +2.9 dB | 6.00 |
| Peak | 3,958 Hz | +1.7 dB | 4.57 |
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
Etymotic ER3XR: $149.99 Amazon eBay
Pros: At 22 ohms and 102 dB/mW it runs fine from a phone, and its single balanced armature design keeps things simple. The warm, treble-shy balance fits listeners who are sensitive to sharp highs and want nothing glaring up top. It rates above the Jabra Elite Active 65t and Master & Dynamic MW07 at a similar price.
Cons: In oratory1990’s measurement treble falls about 8.5 dB below target from 6 to 16 kHz, with a 13.1 dB dip near 11.9 kHz, so cymbals sound dull and fine detail fades. Sub-bass drops 6 dB below target by 30 Hz, and both the Shure SE215 and FiiO FH3 rate higher for less money.
Full Etymotic ER3XR review and specifications →
| Released | 2018 (8 years ago) |
|---|---|
| Back | Closed |
| Built-in Microphone | No |
| Connection | Wired |
| Deviation From Target | 3.48 dB standard deviation |
| Driver Type | Balanced armature |
| Drivers | 1 x balanced armature |
| Form Factor | In-ear |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 16kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Harman Preference Score | 59 (measured by oratory1990, via AutoEQ) |
| Impedance | 22 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 102 dB/mW |
| Sub-bass Extension | Falls 6 dB below target at 30 Hz (-6.1 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.22 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
EQ preset to match the Harman target
Set a preamp of -6.6 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by AutoEQ from its measured frequency response.
| Filter | Frequency | Gain | Q |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low shelf | 105 Hz | +4.1 dB | 0.70 |
| Peak | 7,475 Hz | +6.8 dB | 0.67 |
| Peak | 1,644 Hz | -3.2 dB | 0.62 |
| Peak | 167 Hz | -3.3 dB | 0.48 |
| Peak | 877 Hz | +2.4 dB | 1.64 |
| High shelf | 10,000 Hz | +4.7 dB | 0.70 |
| Peak | 8,614 Hz | -1.8 dB | 1.69 |
| Peak | 5,600 Hz | +1.5 dB | 6.00 |
| Peak | 42 Hz | -0.2 dB | 1.75 |
| Peak | 4,774 Hz | -0.5 dB | 3.58 |
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons