Short answer: the Shuoer Galileo. It ranks #33 of 450 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 4.7/5, at $69.99; the TANGZU XuanNv ranks #59, rated 4.6/5, and costs $79, so there is little reason to consider the other one.
Why pick the Shuoer Galileo: The median of 12 hobbyist measurements on squig.link gives the Galileo a preference score of 82 with a smooth 1.21 dB deviation. The tradeoff: The presence region from 3 to 6 kHz sits about 4.1 dB low, which pushes vocals and guitar attack back behind the bass.
The case for the TANGZU XuanNv: Its dual dynamic drivers score 80.4 in squig.link hobbyist measurements, with a smooth 1.32 dB deviation and a slightly warm tilt. The catch: Presence sits about 3.1 dB below target with a 5.2 dB dip near 6.2 kHz, so vocal articulation and snare crack lose some bite.
Buy the Shuoer Galileo. It is rated higher for sound quality than the TANGZU XuanNv and costs less, which makes it the one to get unless you need something the other one does better.
Still deciding? The full Headphones rankings cover every ranked option.
Specifications Side By Side
| Shuoer Galileo | TANGZU XuanNv | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $69.99 | $79.00 |
| Ranked | #33 of 450 in In-Ear Headphones | #59 of 450 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 82 (median of 12 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 80 (median of 6 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 1.21 dB standard deviation | 1.32 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.13 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.45 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-1.8 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.6 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Hybrid (1 dynamic + 1 balanced armature) | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 1 x balanced armature | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 1 x 8mm dynamic |
| Impedance | 14 ohms | 8.5 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 104 dB/mW | 98 dB |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) | 7Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Built-in Microphone | No | No |
Related Headphone Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for Shuoer Galileo:
- Truthear x Crinacle Zero RED vs Shuoer Galileo
- Truthear Zero Blue 2 vs Shuoer Galileo
- Shuoer Galileo vs Tin HiFi T4 Plus
- TANGZU XuanNv vs Tin HiFi T4 Plus
- EPZ G30 vs TANGZU XuanNv
Prices on this page were last checked October 11, 2026 at 4:59 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Headphones In Full
Shuoer Galileo: $69.99 Amazon eBay
Pros: The median of 12 hobbyist measurements on squig.link gives the Galileo a preference score of 82 with a smooth 1.21 dB deviation. Bass runs about 3.3 dB above target, giving a warm, punchy low end that suits bassy and warm listeners, and sub-bass stays close to target at 30 Hz. The 104 dB/mW sensitivity at 14 ohms makes it easy to drive from a phone.
Cons: The presence region from 3 to 6 kHz sits about 4.1 dB low, which pushes vocals and guitar attack back behind the bass. A 6.5 dB peak near 8.4 kHz and a 5.5 dB dip near 11 kHz make the treble uneven. It is rated below similarly priced rivals such as the EPZ G20 and ThieAudio Legacy 4.
Full Shuoer Galileo review and specifications →
| Released | 2023 (3 years ago) |
|---|---|
| Back | Closed |
| Built-in Microphone | No |
| Connection | Wired |
| Deviation From Target | 1.21 dB standard deviation |
| Driver Type | Hybrid (1 dynamic + 1 balanced armature) |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 1 x balanced armature |
| Form Factor | In-ear |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Harman Preference Score | 82 (median of 12 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Impedance | 14 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 104 dB/mW |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-1.8 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.13 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
TANGZU XuanNv: $79.00 Amazon eBay
Pros: Its dual dynamic drivers score 80.4 in squig.link hobbyist measurements, with a smooth 1.32 dB deviation and a slightly warm tilt. Bass and low mids stay within half a decibel of target and sub-bass extends cleanly to 20 Hz, so it suits warm and bassy listeners who want fullness without boom. Treble peaks are mild, topping out at 1.5 dB near 8.2 kHz, which keeps cymbals and sibilance relaxed for long sessions.
Cons: Presence sits about 3.1 dB below target with a 5.2 dB dip near 6.2 kHz, so vocal articulation and snare crack lose some bite. The 98 dB sensitivity is a little lower than most in-ears, so expect to turn a phone up further than usual.
Full TANGZU XuanNv review and specifications →
| Released | Apr 2024 (2 years ago) |
|---|---|
| Back | Closed |
| Built-in Microphone | No |
| Connection | Wired |
| Deviation From Target | 1.32 dB standard deviation |
| Driver Type | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 1 x 8mm dynamic |
| Form Factor | In-ear |
| Frequency Response | 7Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Harman Preference Score | 80 (median of 6 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Impedance | 8.5 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 98 dB |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.6 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.45 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons