QoA Adonis vs ZiiGaat Lush

Last updated: October 17, 2026

Short answer: the QoA Adonis. It ranks #796 of 1291 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 3.5/5, at $181; the ZiiGaat Lush ranks #868, rated 3.4/5, at $179. With prices this close, go by the sound-quality ranking rather than the cost.

QoA Adonis vs ZiiGaat Lush

Why pick the QoA Adonis: A hybrid with a 9.2mm dynamic driver and two balanced armatures. The catch: A 2.44 dB spread from the target shows peaks and dips that better tuned sets avoid.

Why pick the ZiiGaat Lush: Its warm, smooth tuning across 32 measurements is easy on the ears and never sibilant, and the mids stay close to target. The tradeoff: Nearly everything above 1 kHz is subdued: presence sits about 6.7 dB low with a 7.9 dB dip near 4.3 kHz and treble about 5 dB low, so the sound is dark and lacks detail.

Buy the QoA Adonis. It is rated higher for sound quality, and the $2 you would save on the ZiiGaat Lush does not close the gap.

Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.

QoA Adonis

A hybrid with a 9.2mm dynamic driver and two balanced armatures.

Linsoul $181.00 eBay
$181
ZiiGaat Lush

Its warm, smooth tuning across 32 measurements is easy on the ears and never sibilant, and the mids stay close to target.

Amazon $179.00 eBay
$179

Prices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

QoA Adonis ZiiGaat Lush
Price$181.00$179.00
Ranked#796 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones#868 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones
Form FactorIn-earIn-ear
BackClosedClosed
ConnectionWiredWired
Driver TypeHybridHybrid
Drivers1 x 9.2mm dynamic + 2 x balanced armature1 x 10mm dynamic + 4 x balanced armature
Harman Preference Score68 (median of 3 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)66 (median of 32 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)
Deviation From Target2.44 dB standard deviation2.23 dB standard deviation
Tonal Tilt-0.39 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)-0.58 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-1.7 dB at 30 Hz)Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-2.9 dB at 30 Hz)
Impedance-17 ohms
Sensitivity-103 dB/Vrms
Frequency Response-20Hz - 25kHz (Manufacturer specified)

Frequency Response Compared

Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.

QoA AdonisZiiGaat LushHarman target
Frequency response of the QoA Adonis and ZiiGaat Lush-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: the QoA Adonis from practiphile, soundcheck39 and timmyv; the ZiiGaat Lush from aden, aftersound, atechreviews, audioamigo, avishai, awsmdanny, bassaudio, bloomaudio, cqtek, dl, fernandagunsan, flare, hbb, hobbytalk, jaytiss, joycesreview, koi, kuping-sensi, listener, obodio, practiphile, pw, silicagel, sl0the, soundcheck39, soundignity, superreview, theaudiostore, therollo9, timmyv, treblewellxtended and vortexreviews, all via squig.link.

How QoA Adonis compares with other leading options: