Short answer: the NF Audio NA2 Plus. Both are rated 3.4/5 for sound quality (#869 and #868 of 1291 in-ear headphones), and the NF Audio NA2 Plus costs $169 against $179 for the ZiiGaat Lush, so with nothing between them on sound quality, price settles it.
The case for the NF Audio NA2 Plus: Lower mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, keeping voices and guitars natural. Watch for: An 8 dB peak near 11.5 kHz can make cymbals and sibilance sound sharp.
The case for the ZiiGaat Lush: Its warm, smooth tuning across 32 measurements is easy on the ears and never sibilant, and the mids stay close to target. The catch: Nearly everything above 1 kHz is subdued: presence sits about 6.7 dB low with a 7.9 dB dip near 4.3 kHz and treble about 5 dB low, so the sound is dark and lacks detail.
Buy the NF Audio NA2 Plus. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $10 less than the ZiiGaat Lush.
Still deciding? The full Headphones rankings cover every ranked option.
Lower mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, keeping voices and guitars natural.
Shenzhen Audio $169.00 eBay
Its warm, smooth tuning across 32 measurements is easy on the ears and never sibilant, and the mids stay close to target.
Amazon $179.00 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| NF Audio NA2 Plus | ZiiGaat Lush | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $169.00 | $179.00 |
| Ranked | #869 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #868 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Dynamic | Hybrid |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 4 x balanced armature |
| Impedance | 32 ohms | 17 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 107 dB/mW | 103 dB/Vrms |
| Frequency Response | 9Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) | 20Hz - 25kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Harman Preference Score | 66 (median of 15 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 66 (median of 32 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.58 dB standard deviation | 2.23 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | +0.75 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.58 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-5.0 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-2.9 dB at 30 Hz) |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the NF Audio NA2 Plus from aftersound, ankramutt, arn, bukanaudiophile, cammyfi, cqtek, dentreviews, hbb, jaytiss, kazi, koi, melatonin, musicafe, obodio, practiphile, precog, soundignity, superreview, suporsalad, theaudiostore and treblewellxtended; the ZiiGaat Lush from aden, aftersound, atechreviews, audioamigo, avishai, awsmdanny, bassaudio, bloomaudio, cqtek, dl, fernandagunsan, flare, hbb, hobbytalk, jaytiss, joycesreview, koi, kuping-sensi, listener, obodio, practiphile, pw, silicagel, sl0the, soundcheck39, soundignity, superreview, theaudiostore, therollo9, timmyv, treblewellxtended and vortexreviews, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
How ZiiGaat Lush compares with other leading options: