Short answer: the Philharmonic BMR (v1). It ranks #36 of 130 bookshelf speakers by sound quality at $2200; the Perlisten A3m ranks #43 and costs $3000, so there is little reason to consider the other one.
What the Perlisten A3m offers: Manufacturer data shows a narrow 1.8dB reference band, 0.305dB on-axis average absolute deviation, 0.457 listening-window smoothness, and a rated 111.4dB peak at 1m. Its preference score rises from 3.39 to 6.42 with a subwoofer. A sealed cabinet, two 8-inch carbon-fiber woofers, and a controlled tweeter waveguide make this a high-output monitor. Watch for: The low-quality vendor Spinorama data measures only 85.8Hz at -3dB, 74.1Hz at -6dB, and 55.7Hz at -12dB, conflicting with Perlisten’s much deeper in-room extension claim. A 3.70 sound-power directivity-index standard deviation and 0.295 predicted-in-room smoothness are merely average. It is large, heavy, 4-ohm nominal, and expensive at $3,000/pair.
What the Philharmonic BMR (v1) offers: Large three-way combining a Scan-Speak 7-inch paper/carbon woofer, 2.5-inch Tectonic balanced-mode midrange and RAAL 64-10 ribbon. Erin measured approximately +/-1.5dB linearity from 80Hz upward, very broad +/-40-degree-or-better horizontal coverage and about 83dB/2.83V/1m sensitivity. The port is tuned in the mid/low-30Hz region without audible chuffing, the midrange provides unusually expansive staging, and distortion remained subjectively unobtrusive. Watch for: The measured 83dB sensitivity and roughly 4-ohm load demand meaningful external amplification. A 1-2dB shelf below about 300Hz reduces warmth unless corrected, while a response/impedance feature near 250-300Hz corresponded with Erin’s sense of resonance. The ribbon produces narrower vertical than horizontal radiation, and second-order high-frequency distortion plus dynamic enhancement near 3kHz appeared in testing. This was an earlier cabinet/version, not the current v2.
Buy the Philharmonic BMR (v1). It ranks higher for sound quality than the Perlisten A3m and costs less, which settles it without a real tradeoff to make.
Still deciding? The full Passive Home rankings cover every ranked option.
Specifications Side By Side
| Perlisten A3m | Philharmonic BMR (v1) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3,000 per pair | $2,395 per pair |
| Ranked | #43 of 130 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers | #36 of 130 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 85.8Hz (measured, spinorama.org) | Approximately 62Hz relative to mean (measured, Erin's Audio Corner website) |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | approximately 61Hz (measured, spinorama.org) | 37.8Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Enclosure | Sealed | - |
| Drivers | Two 8-inch carbon-fiber woofers; 35mm Teteron dome tweeter | RAAL 64-10 ribbon; 2.5" BMR midrange; 7" Scan-Speak woofer |
| Sensitivity | 87.4dB at 2.83V/1m | Approximately 83dB/2.83V/1m (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Impedance | 4 ohms nominal; 3 ohms minimum | Approximately 4 ohms nominal (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Dimensions | 26.6 x 11.0 x 13.8 in each | - |
| Maximum SPL | 111.4dB peak at 1m (manufacturer specified) | - |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 3.39 | 5.24 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.42 | 6.90 |
| Port Tuning | - | Mid/low-30Hz range (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Woofer Cabinet | - | ported |
Related Speaker Comparisons
How Philharmonic BMR (v1) compares with other leading options:
- Philharmonic BMR (v1) vs Perlisten S4b
- KEF Reference 1 Meta vs Philharmonic BMR (v1)
- Philharmonic BMR (v1) vs GR-Research NX-Studio
- AsciLab C6B vs Philharmonic BMR (v1)
- Audio First Cadentia 3 vs Philharmonic BMR (v1)
Prices on this page were last checked September 16, 2026 at 12:41 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Perlisten A3m: $3,000 per pair Perlisten Dealer Network eBay
Pros: Manufacturer data shows a narrow 1.8dB reference band, 0.305dB on-axis average absolute deviation, 0.457 listening-window smoothness, and a rated 111.4dB peak at 1m. Its preference score rises from 3.39 to 6.42 with a subwoofer. A sealed cabinet, two 8-inch carbon-fiber woofers, and a controlled tweeter waveguide make this a high-output monitor. Measured bass extension of 85.8Hz (-3dB).
Cons: The low-quality vendor Spinorama data measures only 85.8Hz at -3dB, 74.1Hz at -6dB, and 55.7Hz at -12dB, conflicting with Perlisten’s much deeper in-room extension claim. A 3.70 sound-power directivity-index standard deviation and 0.295 predicted-in-room smoothness are merely average. It is large, heavy, 4-ohm nominal, and expensive at $3,000/pair.
Full Perlisten A3m review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | approximately 61Hz (measured, spinorama.org) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 85.8Hz (measured, spinorama.org) |
| Dimensions | 26.6 x 11.0 x 13.8 in each |
| Drivers | Two 8-inch carbon-fiber woofers; 35mm Teteron dome tweeter |
| Enclosure | Sealed |
| Impedance | 4 ohms nominal; 3 ohms minimum |
| Maximum SPL | 111.4dB peak at 1m (manufacturer specified) |
| Sensitivity | 87.4dB at 2.83V/1m |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 3.39 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.42 |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Perlisten A3m vs ELAC Debut 3.0 DB63
- Perlisten A3m vs Aalto Speakers Aalto 3 Passive
- Perlisten A3m vs Emotiva Airmotiv XB2
- Perlisten A3m vs Ascend Acoustics Sierra-2EX V2
- Perlisten A3m vs Ascend Acoustics Sierra-LX
- Perlisten A3m vs Wharfedale Linton 85
- Perlisten A3m vs ELAC DBR62
- Perlisten A3m vs Dynaudio Heritage Special
- See all 44 comparisons
Philharmonic BMR (v1): $2,395 per pair Philharmonic Audio eBay
Pros: Large three-way combining a Scan-Speak 7-inch paper/carbon woofer, 2.5-inch Tectonic balanced-mode midrange and RAAL 64-10 ribbon. Erin measured approximately +/-1.5dB linearity from 80Hz upward, very broad +/-40-degree-or-better horizontal coverage and about 83dB/2.83V/1m sensitivity. The port is tuned in the mid/low-30Hz region without audible chuffing, the midrange provides unusually expansive staging, and distortion remained subjectively unobtrusive. Measured bass extension of 62Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 83dB.
Cons: The measured 83dB sensitivity and roughly 4-ohm load demand meaningful external amplification. A 1-2dB shelf below about 300Hz reduces warmth unless corrected, while a response/impedance feature near 250-300Hz corresponded with Erin’s sense of resonance. The ribbon produces narrower vertical than horizontal radiation, and second-order high-frequency distortion plus dynamic enhancement near 3kHz appeared in testing. This was an earlier cabinet/version, not the current v2.
Full Philharmonic BMR (v1) review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 37.8Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | Approximately 62Hz relative to mean (measured, Erin's Audio Corner website) |
| Drivers | RAAL 64-10 ribbon; 2.5" BMR midrange; 7" Scan-Speak woofer |
| Impedance | Approximately 4 ohms nominal (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Port Tuning | Mid/low-30Hz range (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | Approximately 83dB/2.83V/1m (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.24 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.90 |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Philharmonic BMR (v1) vs ELAC VELA BS 403
- Philharmonic BMR (v1) vs Selah Audio Integrity
- Philharmonic BMR (v1) vs Ascend Acoustics Sierra-2EX V2
- Philharmonic BMR (v1) vs Ascend Acoustics Sierra-LX
- Philharmonic BMR (v1) vs Wharfedale Linton 85
- Philharmonic BMR (v1) vs Emotiva Airmotiv XB2
- Philharmonic BMR (v1) vs ELAC Debut 3.0 DB63
- Philharmonic BMR (v1) vs Selah Audio Purezza
- See all 49 comparisons