Short answer: the Audio First Fidelia. It ranks #1 of 87 bookshelf speakers by sound quality; the Micca RB42 ranks #72.
What the Micca RB42 offers: Curved cabinet fit and finish look closer to a $400-500 speaker than a $150 one. Rated for a wide 15-100W amplifier range with 4-8 ohm compatibility, giving flexibility with modest amplification. Watch for: CEA2034 spinorama shows significant peaks and valleys in the on-axis and listening-window response starting a few kHz up, with excess high-frequency energy the reviewer found fatiguing over time despite an initial impression of “detail.” Off-axis response diverges heavily from on-axis, meaning tonality shifts with room and listening position in ways EQ can’t correct. Distorts and the woofer visibly flaps under moderate volume; low 83dB sensitivity makes it a harder amplifier load than its size suggests.
What the Audio First Fidelia offers: Kit speaker offering exceptional value and tonal accuracy; chosen by reviewer as reference standard for future speaker tonality comparisons despite 1,250 USD price point. Achieves bass extension to 53 Hz (F3) and 38 Hz (F10) from compact cabinet. Direct-from-manufacturer availability eliminates retailer markup. Watch for: Kit assembly required; lower sensitivity (~83-85 dB vs. typical 85 dB average) demands adequate amplifier power. Only available direct from UK manufacturer with associated shipping costs and lead times. Trade-off between compact driver configuration and maximum dynamic output.
Buy the Micca RB42 if the price matters more than sound quality. Buy the Audio First Fidelia if sound quality matters more than the price.
If sound quality matters at all to you, skip the Micca RB42. It ranks near the bottom of the 87 bookshelf speakers, so look higher up the list instead.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Passive Home rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| Micca RB42 | Audio First Fidelia | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $159.99 per pair | £950 per pair for the flatpack kit (assembly required) |
| Ranked | #72 of 87 in Medium Size Bookshelf Speakers | #1 of 87 in Medium Size Bookshelf Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 85Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) - the reviewer noted an artificial boost around 100-300Hz, so true extension may be worse than this on-axis reading suggests | 53Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 62Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) - the reviewer noted an artificial boost around 100-300Hz, so true extension may be worse than this on-axis reading suggests | 38Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Drivers | 4" coated paper woofer, 0.75" silk dome tweeter | 5" ceramic-aluminum cone woofer, 1" ceramic-aluminum tweeter |
| Dimensions | 8.7H x 4.9W x 7.9D in | 11.8"H x 7.1"W x 11.7"D (300 x 180 x 297.6 mm) |
| Weight | 6 lbs (2.7 kg) each (per retailer listing) | 15 lbs (6.8 kg) each |
| Frequency Response | 50Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified, typical in-room) | - |
| Sensitivity | 80dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review) | 84dB |
| Impedance | 4-8 ohms | 4 ohms |
| Power Handling | 15-100W each | - |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, front | ported, rear |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 3.68 | 5.85 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 5.97 | 7.86 |
| Crossover Frequency | - | 1560Hz |
Related Speaker Comparisons
How Audio First Fidelia compares with other leading options:
- Philharmonic Ceramic Mini vs Audio First Fidelia
- Ascend Sierra 1 v2 vs Audio First Fidelia
- KEF LS50 Meta vs Audio First Fidelia
- XMechanik Mechano23 DIY vs Audio First Fidelia
- Ascend Acoustics HTM-200SE2 vs Audio First Fidelia
Prices on this page were last checked September 16, 2026 at 12:41 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Micca RB42: $159.99 per pair Amazon eBay
Pros: Curved cabinet fit and finish look closer to a $400-500 speaker than a $150 one. Rated for a wide 15-100W amplifier range with 4-8 ohm compatibility, giving flexibility with modest amplification. Measured bass extension of 85Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 80dB.
Cons: CEA2034 spinorama shows significant peaks and valleys in the on-axis and listening-window response starting a few kHz up, with excess high-frequency energy the reviewer found fatiguing over time despite an initial impression of “detail.” Off-axis response diverges heavily from on-axis, meaning tonality shifts with room and listening position in ways EQ can’t correct. Distorts and the woofer visibly flaps under moderate volume; low 83dB sensitivity makes it a harder amplifier load than its size suggests.
Full Micca RB42 review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 62Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) - the reviewer noted an artificial boost around 100-300Hz, so true extension may be worse than this on-axis reading suggests |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 85Hz (measured, Audio Science Review) - the reviewer noted an artificial boost around 100-300Hz, so true extension may be worse than this on-axis reading suggests |
| Dimensions | 8.7H x 4.9W x 7.9D in |
| Drivers | 4" coated paper woofer, 0.75" silk dome tweeter |
| Frequency Response | 50Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified, typical in-room) |
| Impedance | 4-8 ohms |
| Power Handling | 15-100W each |
| Sensitivity | 80dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 3.68 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 5.97 |
| Weight | 6 lbs (2.7 kg) each (per retailer listing) |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, front |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
Audio First Fidelia: £950 per pair for the flatpack kit (assembly required) Audio First Designs eBay
Pros: Kit speaker offering exceptional value and tonal accuracy; chosen by reviewer as reference standard for future speaker tonality comparisons despite 1,250 USD price point. Achieves bass extension to 53 Hz (F3) and 38 Hz (F10) from compact cabinet. Direct-from-manufacturer availability eliminates retailer markup. Measured bass extension of 53Hz (-3dB).
Cons: Kit assembly required; lower sensitivity (~83-85 dB vs. typical 85 dB average) demands adequate amplifier power. Only available direct from UK manufacturer with associated shipping costs and lead times. Trade-off between compact driver configuration and maximum dynamic output.
Full Audio First Fidelia review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 38Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 53Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner) |
| Crossover Frequency | 1560Hz |
| Dimensions | 11.8"H x 7.1"W x 11.7"D (300 x 180 x 297.6 mm) |
| Drivers | 5" ceramic-aluminum cone woofer, 1" ceramic-aluminum tweeter |
| Impedance | 4 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 84dB |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.85 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.86 |
| Weight | 15 lbs (6.8 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Erin’s Audio Corner: The #1 Reason audiophiles Are Raving About Fidelia’s Sound Quality More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
- Erin’s Audio Corner: I Tested 250 Speakers So You Don’t Have To!
- Erin’s Audio Corner: My Absolute Favorite Products of 2024 Revealed
- Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Audio First Fidelia vs Philharmonic Ceramic Mini
- Audio First Fidelia vs Ascend Sierra 1 v2
- Audio First Fidelia vs KEF LS50 Meta
- Audio First Fidelia vs XMechanik Mechano23 DIY
- Audio First Fidelia vs Ascend Acoustics HTM-200SE2
- Audio First Fidelia vs Arendal 1961 Monitor
- Audio First Fidelia vs Ascend Acoustics Luna V2 Mini-Monitor Titan
- Audio First Fidelia vs Aalto Speakers Aalto 1 EVO
- See all 25 comparisons


