Short answer: the Reflector Audio Square Two if sound quality matters most, the KRK Classic 5 if price matters most. The Reflector Audio Square Two ranks #5 of 105 powered bookshelf speakers, rated 4.5/5, at $6,499. The KRK Classic 5 ranks #73, rated 3.4/5, at $319.99, $6,179.01 cheaper.
The case for the KRK Classic 5: ASR’s Klippel data gives -3dB bass around 60Hz and a 5.99 preference score with an ideal subwoofer. The tradeoff: The native standalone score is 3.47 and the midrange span is a large 6.5dB.
The Reflector Audio Square Two is the more accurate option. The manufacturer-supplied data shows a very small 1.1dB span from 300Hz to 5kHz and preference scores of 6.52 standalone and 8.34 with an ideal subwoofer. Its measured preference score, a predictor of how neutral it sounds, is 6.52 against 3.47 for the KRK Classic 5. Watch for: The nominal 60-by-60-degree pattern calls for careful aiming and gives less freedom to move than wide-dispersion monitors.
Buy the KRK Classic 5 if the price matters more than sound quality. Buy the Reflector Audio Square Two if sound quality matters more than the price.
Still deciding? The full Powered Home rankings cover every ranked option.
Specifications Side By Side
| KRK Classic 5 | Reflector Audio Square Two | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $319.99 per pair | $6,499 per pair |
| Ranked | #73 of 105 in Medium Size Powered Bookshelf Speakers | #5 of 105 in Medium Size Powered Bookshelf Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 60.1Hz (Spinorama/Audio Science Review) | - |
| Bass Extension (-6dB) | 54.2Hz (Spinorama/Audio Science Review) | - |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 3.47 | 6.52 |
| Dimensions | 9.7”H x 7.4”W x 11.2”D (246.4 x 188 x 284.5 mm) | 12.6”W x 13.6”H x 12.8”D (320 x 345 x 325 mm) |
| Frequency Response | 56Hz-30kHz (+-3dB) (Manufacturer specified) | 40Hz-26kHz (-6dB) |
| Inputs | RCA, TRS, XLR | Analogue XLR/RCA, AES digital XLR, S/PDIF, TOSLINK optical |
| Weight | 12.9 lbs (5.87 kg) | 42.8 lbs (19.4 kg) each |
| Drivers | 5” (127mm) woofer | 4x 5” woofers, 1x horn-loaded compression driver (ring diaphragm) |
| App | No | - |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| EQ | Yes (Room adjustment) | - |
| Amplifier Power | 50w RMS Per Speaker | 250W to woofers, 100W to compression driver (Hypex Class-D) |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 5.99 | 8.34 |
| XLR Input | Yes | Yes |
| RCA Input | Yes | Yes |
| TRS Input | Yes | No |
| Optical Input | No | Yes |
| Coaxial Input | No | Yes |
| USB Input | No | No |
| HDMI Input | No | No |
| AES Input | No | Yes |
| Aux Input | No | No |
| Enclosure | - | 2-way active coaxial horn monitor, bass-reflex (convertible to sealed) |
| Country | - | Made in Latvia |
| Maximum SPL | - | 118dB @ 1m (EIA-426B, single monitor) (manufacturer specified) |
Related Speaker Comparisons
How Reflector Audio Square Two compares with other leading options:
- Neumann KH80 DSP vs Reflector Audio Square Two
- JBL 305P MKII vs Reflector Audio Square Two
- IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII vs Reflector Audio Square Two
- Kali Audio IN-5 vs Reflector Audio Square Two
- KEF LSX II LT vs Reflector Audio Square Two
Prices on this page were last checked October 9, 2026 at 8:01 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
KRK Classic 5: $319.99 per pair Amazon eBay
Pros: ASR’s Klippel data gives -3dB bass around 60Hz and a 5.99 preference score with an ideal subwoofer. Broad tonal correction can improve it, so it may be useful to someone willing to measure and EQ a basic studio setup. Measured bass extension of 60.1Hz (-3dB).
Cons: The native standalone score is 3.47 and the midrange span is a large 6.5dB. Excess treble and crossover/directivity errors keep it from being neutral out of the box, while low-bass distortion limits loud playback. Modeled EQ scores are not stock performance and do not demonstrate corrected distortion or dispersion.
Full KRK Classic 5 review and specifications →
| AES Input | No |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | 50w RMS Per Speaker |
| App | No |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 60.1Hz (Spinorama/Audio Science Review) |
| Bass Extension (-6dB) | 54.2Hz (Spinorama/Audio Science Review) |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| Dimensions | 9.7”H x 7.4”W x 11.2”D (246.4 x 188 x 284.5 mm) |
| Drivers | 5” (127mm) woofer |
| EQ | Yes (Room adjustment) |
| Frequency Response | 56Hz-30kHz (+-3dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | RCA, TRS, XLR |
| Optical Input | No |
| RCA Input | Yes |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 3.47 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 5.99 |
| TRS Input | Yes |
| USB Input | No |
| Weight | 12.9 lbs (5.87 kg) |
| XLR Input | Yes |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Audio Science Review Measurements More from Audio Science Review →
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Edifier S1000MKII vs Edifier S2000MKIII sound.DEMO More from DSAUDIOreview →
- DSAUDIO.review: Edifier S2000MKIII vs Edifier S3000PRO Sound & Frequency Response Comparison
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs KRK Classic 5 CL5G3 sound.DEMO
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review JBL 305P MKII vs KRK Classic 5 CL5G3 sound.DEMO
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review KRK Classic 5 CL5G3 vs Yamaha HS5 sound.DEMO
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review KRK Classic 5 CL5G3 vs KRK Rokit 5 RP5G4 sound.DEMO
- Audio Science Review Measurements (spinorama.org)
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
Reflector Audio Square Two: $6,499 per pair Monheim Microphones eBay
Pros: The manufacturer-supplied data shows a very small 1.1dB span from 300Hz to 5kHz and preference scores of 6.52 standalone and 8.34 with an ideal subwoofer. Its horn-centered layout and four surrounding woofers offer a compact, controlled-radiation monitor, with a measured -3dB point around 49Hz. The linked Sound on Sound review also supports its use for detailed monitoring.
Cons: The nominal 60-by-60-degree pattern calls for careful aiming and gives less freedom to move than wide-dispersion monitors.
Full Reflector Audio Square Two review and specifications →
| AES Input | Yes |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | 250W to woofers, 100W to compression driver (Hypex Class-D) |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Coaxial Input | Yes |
| Country | Made in Latvia |
| Dimensions | 12.6”W x 13.6”H x 12.8”D (320 x 345 x 325 mm) |
| Drivers | 4x 5” woofers, 1x horn-loaded compression driver (ring diaphragm) |
| Enclosure | 2-way active coaxial horn monitor, bass-reflex (convertible to sealed) |
| Frequency Response | 40Hz-26kHz (-6dB) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | Analogue XLR/RCA, AES digital XLR, S/PDIF, TOSLINK optical |
| Maximum SPL | 118dB @ 1m (EIA-426B, single monitor) (manufacturer specified) |
| Optical Input | Yes |
| RCA Input | Yes |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.52 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 8.34 |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | No |
| Weight | 42.8 lbs (19.4 kg) each |
| XLR Input | Yes |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs Neumann KH80 DSP
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs JBL 305P MKII
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs Kali Audio IN-5
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs KEF LSX II LT
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs Adam Audio T5V
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs Kali LP-UNF
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs Yamaha HS5
- See all 12 comparisons