Short answer: the Reflector Audio Square Two if sound quality matters most, the Kali Audio IN-5 if price matters most. The Reflector Audio Square Two ranks #5 of 100 powered bookshelf speakers, rated 4.5/5, at $6,499. The Kali Audio IN-5 ranks #26, rated 4.2/5, at $898, $5,601 cheaper.
What the Kali Audio IN-5 does well: The active three-way layout separates bass duties from the coaxial mid/tweeter, giving flexible listening geometry. The tradeoff: Local listening-window irregularities remain despite the small overall midrange span.
The Reflector Audio Square Two is the more accurate option. The manufacturer-supplied data shows a very small 1.1dB span from 300Hz to 5kHz and preference scores of 6.52 standalone and 8.34 with an ideal subwoofer. Its measured preference score, a predictor of how neutral it sounds, is 6.52 against 5.12 for the Kali Audio IN-5. Watch for: The nominal 60-by-60-degree pattern calls for careful aiming and gives less freedom to move than wide-dispersion monitors.
Buy the Kali Audio IN-5 if the price matters more than sound quality. Buy the Reflector Audio Square Two if sound quality matters more than the price.
Want more options? Browse the full Powered Home rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| Kali Audio IN-5 | Reflector Audio Square Two | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $898 per pair | $6,499 per pair |
| Ranked | #26 of 100 in Medium Size Powered Bookshelf Speakers | #5 of 100 in Medium Size Powered Bookshelf Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | Approximately 45Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | - |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 40.0Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | - |
| Drivers | 1” tweeter coaxial with 4” midrange; 5” woofer | 4x 5” woofers, 1x horn-loaded compression driver (ring diaphragm) |
| Amplifier Power | 80W LF + 40W mid + 40W HF | 250W to woofers, 100W to compression driver (Hypex Class-D) |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, front | - |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.12 | 6.52 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.13 | 8.34 |
| Inputs | XLR, TRS, RCA | Analogue XLR/RCA, AES digital XLR, S/PDIF, TOSLINK optical |
| XLR Input | Yes | Yes |
| RCA Input | Yes | Yes |
| TRS Input | Yes | No |
| Optical Input | No | Yes |
| Coaxial Input | No | Yes |
| USB Input | No | No |
| HDMI Input | No | No |
| AES Input | No | Yes |
| Aux Input | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Dimensions | 15” x 8.1” x 11.1” (382 x 206 x 282 mm) (H x W x D) | 12.6”W x 13.6”H x 12.8”D (320 x 345 x 325 mm) |
| Frequency Response | 39Hz - 25kHz (-10dB) (Manufacturer specified) | 40Hz-26kHz (-6dB) |
| Weight | 18.6 lbs (8.43 kg) each | 42.8 lbs (19.4 kg) each |
| Enclosure | - | 2-way active coaxial horn monitor, bass-reflex (convertible to sealed) |
| Country | - | Made in Latvia |
| Maximum SPL | - | 118dB @ 1m (EIA-426B, single monitor) (manufacturer specified) |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More top alternatives to Reflector Audio Square Two:
- Neumann KH80 DSP vs Reflector Audio Square Two
- JBL 305P MKII vs Reflector Audio Square Two
- IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII vs Reflector Audio Square Two
- KEF LSX II LT vs Reflector Audio Square Two
- Adam Audio T5V vs Reflector Audio Square Two
Prices on this page were last checked October 9, 2026 at 8:01 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Kali Audio IN-5: $898 per pair Amazon B&H Photo Video eBay
Same family: the Kali Audio IN-8 V2 (larger bookshelf, rated 4.4/5) and the Kali Audio IN-UNF (larger bookshelf, ranked lower, rated 3.3/5).
Pros: The active three-way layout separates bass duties from the coaxial mid/tweeter, giving flexible listening geometry. Erin’s data shows a 1.8dB midrange response span and -3dB bass around 45Hz, with scores of 5.12 standalone and 7.13 with an ideal subwoofer. Placement switches and balanced inputs help integrate it into a studio; moderate-level distortion is well controlled in the existing review. Measured bass extension of 45Hz (-3dB).
Cons: Local listening-window irregularities remain despite the small overall midrange span. The review reports midrange distortion rising above 3% at 96dB and a brighter perceived balance at closer distances. Limiting makes it unsuitable for demanding farfield playback. Coaxial construction improves geometry but does not remove response errors or guarantee unlimited output.
Full Kali Audio IN-5 review and specifications →
| AES Input | No |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | 80W LF + 40W mid + 40W HF |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 40.0Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | Approximately 45Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| Dimensions | 15” x 8.1” x 11.1” (382 x 206 x 282 mm) (H x W x D) |
| Drivers | 1” tweeter coaxial with 4” midrange; 5” woofer |
| Frequency Response | 39Hz - 25kHz (-10dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | XLR, TRS, RCA |
| Optical Input | No |
| RCA Input | Yes |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.12 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.13 |
| TRS Input | Yes |
| USB Input | No |
| Weight | 18.6 lbs (8.43 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, front |
| XLR Input | Yes |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Kali Audio IN-5 vs Kali Audio SM-5
- Kali Audio IN-5 vs HEDD Type 05 A-CORE
- Kali Audio IN-5 vs Sigberg Audio SBS Gen 2
- Kali Audio IN-5 vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII
- Kali Audio IN-5 vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM
- Kali Audio IN-5 vs Sigberg Audio SBS.1
- Kali Audio IN-5 vs Mackie MR524
- Kali Audio IN-5 vs Pioneer DJ VM-50
- See all 61 comparisons
Reflector Audio Square Two: $6,499 per pair Monheim Microphones eBay
Pros: The manufacturer-supplied data shows a very small 1.1dB span from 300Hz to 5kHz and preference scores of 6.52 standalone and 8.34 with an ideal subwoofer. Its horn-centered layout and four surrounding woofers offer a compact, controlled-radiation monitor, with a measured -3dB point around 49Hz. The linked Sound on Sound review also supports its use for detailed monitoring.
Cons: The nominal 60-by-60-degree pattern calls for careful aiming and gives less freedom to move than wide-dispersion monitors.
Full Reflector Audio Square Two review and specifications →
| AES Input | Yes |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | 250W to woofers, 100W to compression driver (Hypex Class-D) |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Coaxial Input | Yes |
| Country | Made in Latvia |
| Dimensions | 12.6”W x 13.6”H x 12.8”D (320 x 345 x 325 mm) |
| Drivers | 4x 5” woofers, 1x horn-loaded compression driver (ring diaphragm) |
| Enclosure | 2-way active coaxial horn monitor, bass-reflex (convertible to sealed) |
| Frequency Response | 40Hz-26kHz (-6dB) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | Analogue XLR/RCA, AES digital XLR, S/PDIF, TOSLINK optical |
| Maximum SPL | 118dB @ 1m (EIA-426B, single monitor) (manufacturer specified) |
| Optical Input | Yes |
| RCA Input | Yes |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.52 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 8.34 |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | No |
| Weight | 42.8 lbs (19.4 kg) each |
| XLR Input | Yes |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs Neumann KH80 DSP
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs JBL 305P MKII
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs IK Multimedia iLoud MTM MKII
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs KEF LSX II LT
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs Adam Audio T5V
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs Kali LP-UNF
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs Yamaha HS5
- Reflector Audio Square Two vs Edifier S2000MKIII
- See all 12 comparisons