Short answer: the Klipsch The Nines. It ranks #40 of 68 powered bookshelf speakers by sound quality, rated 4.2/5, at $999.99; the Focal Twin6 Be ranks #62, rated 3.8/5, and costs $4,400, so there is not much of a tradeoff to weigh.
What the Klipsch The Nines does well: The 1.7dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz supports even mids, and measured -3dB extension is 42.5Hz. The tradeoff: The 6.90 ideal-subwoofer score reflects limitations beyond the narrow midband span.
What the Focal Twin6 Be does well: The dual-woofer arrangement offers useful output capability for studio work, with a 48.3Hz measured -3dB point in the horizontal test. Watch for: The horizontal measurement scores 6.06 with an ideal subwoofer and spans 2.9dB from 300Hz to 5kHz.
Buy the Klipsch The Nines. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Focal Twin6 Be and costs less, which makes it the one to get unless you need something the other one does better.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Powered Home rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| Klipsch The Nines | Focal Twin6 Be | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $999.99 per pair | $4,400 per pair |
| Ranked | #40 of 68 in Large Size Powered Bookshelf Speakers | #62 of 68 in Large Size Powered Bookshelf Speakers |
| Drivers | 8” high-excursion fiber-composite woofer, 1” titanium LTS vented tweeter with Tractrix horn | 1” inverted beryllium tweeter; dual 6.5” W-cone drivers |
| Amplifier Power | 240W total (480W peak; 100W LF + 20W HF per powered speaker) | 150W LF + 100W LF/MF + 100W HF |
| Inputs | HDMI ARC, Bluetooth 5.0, phono/line RCA, 3.5mm, USB, optical | Balanced XLR with +4dBu/-10dBV sensitivity |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD | - |
| Dimensions | 19.13”H x 9.5”W x 13.38”D | 9.8” x 19.7” x 13.4” (250 x 500 x 340 mm) (H x W x D) |
| Weight | 28.4 lbs (12.9 kg) primary, 26.9 lbs (12.2 kg) secondary | 48.5 lbs (22 kg) |
| Sensitivity | 82.5dB (measured at 0.30V/1m, Erin’s Audio Corner) | - |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 42.5Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 48.3Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 31Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 39.1Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Frequency Response | 34Hz - 25kHz +/-3dB (manufacturer specified) | 40Hz - 40kHz (±3dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| App | Klipsch Connect (bass/mid/treble EQ) | - |
| Woofer Cabinet | rear-ported bass reflex | - |
| Maximum SPL | 115dB at 1m (stereo pair, manufacturer specified) | - |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.32 | 4.04 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.90 | 6.06 |
| Subwoofer Output | Yes | - |
| Outputs | Subwoofer | - |
| XLR Input | No | Yes |
| RCA Input | Yes | No |
| TRS Input | No | No |
| Optical Input | Yes | No |
| Coaxial Input | No | No |
| USB Input | Yes | No |
| HDMI Input | Yes | No |
| AES Input | No | No |
| Aux Input | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes, 5.0 | No |
| Bass Extension | - | 40Hz manufacturer specified; Erin measured strong low-frequency linearity |
Related Speaker Comparisons
How Klipsch The Nines compares with other leading options:
- Klipsch The Nines vs Genelec 8351B
- Klipsch The Nines vs Neumann KH420
- Klipsch The Nines vs Genelec 8361A
- Klipsch The Nines vs Genelec 8341A
- Klipsch The Nines vs Neumann KH 150
Prices on this page were last checked September 30, 2026 at 2:57 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Klipsch The Nines: $999.99 per pair Crutchfield eBay
Pros: The 1.7dB response span from 300Hz to 5kHz supports even mids, and measured -3dB extension is 42.5Hz. Extensive consumer connections and app adjustment make it convenient for TV and music, while the horn provides a focused listening presentation. Erin called it his favorite Klipsch speaker. Measured bass extension of 42.5Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 82.5dB.
Cons: The 6.90 ideal-subwoofer score reflects limitations beyond the narrow midband span. Horizontal coverage is relatively focused, so placement matters for multiple seats. The reviewer preferred reduced treble, and bass limiting at higher playback levels means the large woofer is not a guarantee of unlimited output. The app’s flat setting leaves treble elevated; Erin preferred a -2dB tweeter trim.
Full Klipsch The Nines review and specifications →
| AES Input | No |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | 240W total (480W peak; 100W LF + 20W HF per powered speaker) |
| App | Klipsch Connect (bass/mid/treble EQ) |
| Aux Input | Yes |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 31Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 42.5Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bluetooth | Yes, 5.0 |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| Dimensions | 19.13”H x 9.5”W x 13.38”D |
| Drivers | 8” high-excursion fiber-composite woofer, 1” titanium LTS vented tweeter with Tractrix horn |
| Frequency Response | 34Hz - 25kHz +/-3dB (manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | Yes |
| Inputs | HDMI ARC, Bluetooth 5.0, phono/line RCA, 3.5mm, USB, optical |
| Maximum SPL | 115dB at 1m (stereo pair, manufacturer specified) |
| Optical Input | Yes |
| Outputs | Subwoofer |
| RCA Input | Yes |
| Sensitivity | 82.5dB (measured at 0.30V/1m, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.32 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.90 |
| Subwoofer Output | Yes |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | Yes |
| Weight | 28.4 lbs (12.9 kg) primary, 26.9 lbs (12.2 kg) secondary |
| Woofer Cabinet | rear-ported bass reflex |
| XLR Input | No |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Klipsch The Nines vs JBL 306P MKII
- Klipsch The Nines vs JBL 708P
- Klipsch The Nines vs JBL 4329P
- Klipsch The Nines vs JBL M2 Master Reference Monitor
- Klipsch The Nines vs APS Klasik 2020
- Klipsch The Nines vs Genelec 8040B
- Klipsch The Nines vs Kali Audio LP-6
- Klipsch The Nines vs Emotiva Airmotiv 6s
- See all 32 comparisons
Focal Twin6 Be: $4,400 per pair Amazon eBay
Pros: The dual-woofer arrangement offers useful output capability for studio work, with a 48.3Hz measured -3dB point in the horizontal test. Its professional controls and format can suit a dedicated monitoring installation. Measured bass extension of 48.3Hz (-3dB).
Cons: The horizontal measurement scores 6.06 with an ideal subwoofer and spans 2.9dB from 300Hz to 5kHz. Off-axis variation limits tonal consistency across listening positions. Orientation matters, and neither the beryllium tweeter nor the additional woofer makes its measured balance class-leading. Erin suspected intermodulation-related roughness even though harmonic distortion measured low.
Full Focal Twin6 Be review and specifications →
| AES Input | No |
|---|---|
| Amplifier Power | 150W LF + 100W LF/MF + 100W HF |
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension | 40Hz manufacturer specified; Erin measured strong low-frequency linearity |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 39.1Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 48.3Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bluetooth | No |
| Coaxial Input | No |
| Dimensions | 9.8” x 19.7” x 13.4” (250 x 500 x 340 mm) (H x W x D) |
| Drivers | 1” inverted beryllium tweeter; dual 6.5” W-cone drivers |
| Frequency Response | 40Hz - 40kHz (±3dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| HDMI Input | No |
| Inputs | Balanced XLR with +4dBu/-10dBV sensitivity |
| Optical Input | No |
| RCA Input | No |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 4.04 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.06 |
| TRS Input | No |
| USB Input | No |
| Weight | 48.5 lbs (22 kg) |
| XLR Input | Yes |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Focal Twin6 Be vs Edifier R2850DB
- Focal Twin6 Be vs Ex Machina Pulsar MKII
- Focal Twin6 Be vs Klipsch The Sevens
- Focal Twin6 Be vs PMC result6
- Focal Twin6 Be vs Kali Audio LP-8
- Focal Twin6 Be vs Ocean Way Audio HR5
- Focal Twin6 Be vs Adam Audio T7V
- Focal Twin6 Be vs Adam Audio T8V
- See all 35 comparisons