Short answer: the MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition for better sound quality, the Klipsch RP-8000F II for the lower price. The MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition ranks #4 of 188 floorstanding speakers, rated 4.8/5, at $7,995. The Klipsch RP-8000F II ranks #113, rated 3.9/5, at $1,159.98, $6,835.02 cheaper.
What the Klipsch RP-8000F II does well: Highest sensitivity of the RP II floorstander line (~92dB measured) and the best dynamics/compression behavior of the three under load: the cleanest at high output. Watch for: Mid-bass sounds lean despite the dual 8-inch woofers, and bass extension disappointed for its size: expected to reach 50Hz, didn’t get there in-room.
The MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition is the better-sounding, deeper-bass option. Extended bass to approximately 30 Hz in-room without subwoofer; images with excellent precision indicating tight frequency response matching between speakers. Its bass reaches about 38Hz before falling 3dB, against 67Hz for the Klipsch RP-8000F II. Watch for: Moderate sensitivity (~89 dB) means amplifier power requirements higher than many alternatives.
Buy the Klipsch RP-8000F II if the price matters more than sound quality. Buy the MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition if sound quality matters more than the price.
Still deciding? The full Passive Home rankings cover every ranked option.
Specifications Side By Side
| Klipsch RP-8000F II | MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,159.98 per pair | $7995 per pair |
| Ranked | #113 of 188 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers | #4 of 188 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 33Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 25Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 67Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 38Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 92dB (2.83V/1m, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) | 88.8dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Drivers | 1” titanium tweeter with 90x90 Tractrix horn, dual 8” cerametallic woofers | 10” woofer, 10” paper‑cone concentric midrange, 1.25” soft‑dome concentric tweeter |
| Weight | 61.3 lbs (27.8 kg) | 160.9 lbs (73 kg) |
| Impedance | 8 ohms nominal (3.7 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) | 6 ohms nominal, 5.3 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Frequency Response | 35Hz - 25kHz (+-3dB, Manufacturer specified) | - |
| Crossover Frequency | 1630Hz | - |
| Power Handling | 150W continuous, 600W peak | - |
| Dimensions | 43.1” x 10.8” x 18.3” (1095 x 275 x 464 mm) | 48.8”H x 15.5”W x 19.9”D (1239.5 x 393.7 x 505.5 mm) |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear | passive radiator |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.39 | 5.00 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.12 | 6.31 |
| DIY Kit | No | No |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More top alternatives to MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition:
- GR-Research NX-Treme vs MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition
- KEF Blade Two Meta vs MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition
- MoFi SourcePoint 888 vs MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition
- MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition vs Revel F328Be
- Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66 vs MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition
Prices on this page were last checked October 9, 2026 at 8:01 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Klipsch RP-8000F II: $1,159.98 per pair Amazon eBay
Same family: the Klipsch RP-500M II (smaller bookshelf, rated 4/5), the Klipsch RP-600M II (larger bookshelf, rated 3.7/5), the Klipsch RP-5000F II (smaller floorstanding, ranked higher, rated 4/5), the Klipsch RP-6000F II (smaller floorstanding, ranked lower, rated 3.9/5), the Klipsch RP-404C II (smallest center, rated 3.7/5), the Klipsch RP-500C II (center, rated 3.9/5) and the Klipsch RP-504C II (largest center, rated 3.8/5).
Pros: Highest sensitivity of the RP II floorstander line (~92dB measured) and the best dynamics/compression behavior of the three under load: the cleanest at high output. Dual 8-inch woofers and the highest power handling in the line. Measured bass extension of 67Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 92dB.
Cons: Mid-bass sounds lean despite the dual 8-inch woofers, and bass extension disappointed for its size: expected to reach 50Hz, didn’t get there in-room. Has its own edgy upper-mid bump (2-6kHz) that’s harder to EQ out than the other two models’ issues, since it stems from the vertical horn/woofer offset rather than simple tonal balance. The most placement-critical of the three, with the narrowest horizontal (~40-50 degrees) and vertical (+5/-10 degrees) dispersion.
Full Klipsch RP-8000F II review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 33Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 67Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Crossover Frequency | 1630Hz |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 43.1” x 10.8” x 18.3” (1095 x 275 x 464 mm) |
| Drivers | 1” titanium tweeter with 90x90 Tractrix horn, dual 8” cerametallic woofers |
| Frequency Response | 35Hz - 25kHz (+-3dB, Manufacturer specified) |
| Impedance | 8 ohms nominal (3.7 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Power Handling | 150W continuous, 600W peak |
| Sensitivity | 92dB (2.83V/1m, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.39 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.12 |
| Weight | 61.3 lbs (27.8 kg) |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Klipsch RP-8000F II vs Dynaudio Emit 30
- Klipsch RP-8000F II vs Klipsch RP-6000F II
- Klipsch RP-8000F II vs Klipsch RP-5000F II
- Klipsch RP-8000F II vs KLH Model Five
- Klipsch RP-8000F II vs KEF Q11 Meta
- Klipsch RP-8000F II vs Definitive Technology BP-9020
- Klipsch RP-8000F II vs SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle
- Klipsch RP-8000F II vs Klipsch Forte IV
- See all 44 comparisons
MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition: $7995 per pair Crutchfield eBay
Pros: Extended bass to approximately 30 Hz in-room without subwoofer; images with excellent precision indicating tight frequency response matching between speakers. Integrated bass management with three-way treble attenuation switches for room tuning. New design from Andrew Jones represents reviewer personal second choice (behind only KEF Blade Two Meta at 29k) among hundreds of systems auditioned; ranks above Dutch & Dutch 8C, JBL 4367, and JBL M2 Master Reference Monitor. Measured bass extension of 38Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 88.8dB.
Cons: Moderate sensitivity (~89 dB) means amplifier power requirements higher than many alternatives. Deep bass extension ends above subsonic frequencies (pipe organ territory below 17 Hz requires subwoofer).
Full MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 25Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 38Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 48.8”H x 15.5”W x 19.9”D (1239.5 x 393.7 x 505.5 mm) |
| Drivers | 10” woofer, 10” paper‑cone concentric midrange, 1.25” soft‑dome concentric tweeter |
| Impedance | 6 ohms nominal, 5.3 ohms minimum (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 88.8dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 5.00 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.31 |
| Weight | 160.9 lbs (73 kg) |
| Woofer Cabinet | passive radiator |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition vs KEF Blade Two Meta
- MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition vs GR-Research NX-Treme
- MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition vs MoFi SourcePoint 888
- MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition vs Revel F328Be
- MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition vs Radiant Acoustics Clarity 66
- MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition vs Ascend Acoustics ELX Ribbon Tower
- MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition vs Revel F226Be
- MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition vs JBL 4367
- See all 28 comparisons