Klipsch RP-600M II vs Tannoy Revolution XT 6

Last updated: September 16, 2026

Short answer: the Klipsch RP-600M II. It ranks #74 of 130 bookshelf speakers by sound quality at $449.99; the Tannoy Revolution XT 6 ranks #115 and costs $1100, so there is not much of a tradeoff to weigh.

Klipsch RP-600M II vs Tannoy Revolution XT 6

What the Klipsch RP-600M II offers: Redesigned waveguide extends flush to the baffle edge, reducing diffraction compared to the original RP-600M. Roughly 10-20° wider horizontal radiation than the original, giving more soundstage envelopment while retaining precise imaging. A major step up in overall tonal neutrality compared to the original RP-600M, largely eliminating that model’s midrange resonance issues. Unusually, sounds better with the grille on - the grille smooths out the elevated treble rather than degrading the sound, a rare trait among speakers the reviewer has tested. More refined back-panel hardware, including anodized binding posts and jumper cables for optional bi-amping. Responds well to EQ correction (verified using measurement software and a miniDSP), letting the on-axis response be made genuinely linear. Watch for: On-axis, the treble runs notably hot - even hotter than the original RP-600M in some respects - and needs about 20° of toe-out or the grille installed to sound balanced. Horizontal dispersion is very slightly less linear across angles than the original RP-600M, a minor trade-off for the wider overall radiation pattern. Klipsch’s marketed sensitivity (about 94.5dB) is, like the original, a half-space rating roughly 9dB above the anechoic reality (closer to 85-86dB). In-room bass rolls off around 60Hz in practice, and a 120Hz boost paired with a midrange scoop gives kick drums their “tambour” without real low-end weight - a subwoofer is still recommended. Vertical listening tolerance is limited to about ±10° from the tweeter axis. Toeing the speaker out for better on-axis tonality (rather than using the grille) introduces slightly more diffuse imaging from added sidewall reflections.

What the Tannoy Revolution XT 6 offers: Horizontal directivity is very good outside of a narrow glitch around 2.5kHz, meaning the coaxial design’s off-axis sound closely tracks on-axis within a +/-50 degree toe-in window. Vertical response is notably better than a typical non-coaxial 2-way thanks to the concentric driver, and the downward-firing, base-integrated port is a distinctive, functional piece of industrial design. Watch for: CEA2034 spinorama shows significant on-axis dips and rising amplitude above 3kHz, and distortion measurements are the headline problem - 4-5% distortion at 96dB SPL in the most sensitive part of the audible band, far higher than the Revel M106 comparison unit at the same level. Careful multi-notch EQ improved things but never fully resolved it. The reviewer’s conclusion: “I can’t recommend the Tannoy XT 6” - the coaxial design’s distortion should have been addressed by the designer, not patched after the fact with EQ.

Buy the Klipsch RP-600M II. It ranks higher for sound quality than the Tannoy Revolution XT 6 and costs less, so there is no real case for the other one.

The Tannoy Revolution XT 6 is not a sound-quality pick. It sits near the bottom of the 130 bookshelf speakers; there are better options higher up.

Looking for alternatives? See the complete Passive Home rankings.

Specifications Side By Side

Klipsch RP-600M II Tannoy Revolution XT 6
Price$449.99 per pair$1100 per pair
Ranked#74 of 130 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers#115 of 130 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers
Bass Extension (-10dB)41Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)60Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)70Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)85Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Dimensions15.7"H x 8"W x 12.5"D (398.8 x 203.2 x 317.5 mm)15.8H x 8.7W x 11.9D in
Impedance8 ohms nominal (3.5 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin's Audio Corner)8 ohms nominal
Sensitivity86dB (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)86.5dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review)
Drivers6.5" Cerametallic cone woofer, 1" titanium LTS vented tweeter with Tractrix horn6" dual-concentric multifiber-cone woofer with coaxial 1" PEI dome tweeter
Weight13 lbs (5.9 kg) each16.5 lbs (7.5 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetportedported, bottom-firing
Spinorama Preference Score4.751.52
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub6.884.04
Power Handling-25-120W recommended, 240W peak

More top alternatives to Klipsch RP-600M II:

Prices on this page were last checked September 16, 2026 at 12:41 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

Klipsch RP-600M II: $449.99 per pair Amazon eBay

Klipsch RP-600M II ranking card

Pros: Redesigned waveguide extends flush to the baffle edge, reducing diffraction compared to the original RP-600M. Roughly 10-20° wider horizontal radiation than the original, giving more soundstage envelopment while retaining precise imaging. A major step up in overall tonal neutrality compared to the original RP-600M, largely eliminating that model’s midrange resonance issues. Unusually, sounds better with the grille on - the grille smooths out the elevated treble rather than degrading the sound, a rare trait among speakers the reviewer has tested. More refined back-panel hardware, including anodized binding posts and jumper cables for optional bi-amping. Responds well to EQ correction (verified using measurement software and a miniDSP), letting the on-axis response be made genuinely linear. Measured bass extension of 70Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 86dB.

Cons: On-axis, the treble runs notably hot - even hotter than the original RP-600M in some respects - and needs about 20° of toe-out or the grille installed to sound balanced. Horizontal dispersion is very slightly less linear across angles than the original RP-600M, a minor trade-off for the wider overall radiation pattern. Klipsch’s marketed sensitivity (about 94.5dB) is, like the original, a half-space rating roughly 9dB above the anechoic reality (closer to 85-86dB). In-room bass rolls off around 60Hz in practice, and a 120Hz boost paired with a midrange scoop gives kick drums their “tambour” without real low-end weight - a subwoofer is still recommended. Vertical listening tolerance is limited to about ±10° from the tweeter axis. Toeing the speaker out for better on-axis tonality (rather than using the grille) introduces slightly more diffuse imaging from added sidewall reflections.

Bass Extension (-10dB)41Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)70Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Dimensions15.7"H x 8"W x 12.5"D (398.8 x 203.2 x 317.5 mm)
Drivers6.5" Cerametallic cone woofer, 1" titanium LTS vented tweeter with Tractrix horn
Impedance8 ohms nominal (3.5 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin's Audio Corner)
Sensitivity86dB (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Spinorama Preference Score4.75
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub6.88
Weight13 lbs (5.9 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported

Tannoy Revolution XT 6: $1100 per pair eBay

Tannoy Revolution XT 6 ranking card

Pros: Horizontal directivity is very good outside of a narrow glitch around 2.5kHz, meaning the coaxial design’s off-axis sound closely tracks on-axis within a +/-50 degree toe-in window. Vertical response is notably better than a typical non-coaxial 2-way thanks to the concentric driver, and the downward-firing, base-integrated port is a distinctive, functional piece of industrial design. Measured bass extension of 85Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 86.5dB.

Cons: CEA2034 spinorama shows significant on-axis dips and rising amplitude above 3kHz, and distortion measurements are the headline problem - 4-5% distortion at 96dB SPL in the most sensitive part of the audible band, far higher than the Revel M106 comparison unit at the same level. Careful multi-notch EQ improved things but never fully resolved it. The reviewer’s conclusion: “I can’t recommend the Tannoy XT 6” - the coaxial design’s distortion should have been addressed by the designer, not patched after the fact with EQ.

Bass Extension (-10dB)60Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)85Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Dimensions15.8H x 8.7W x 11.9D in
Drivers6" dual-concentric multifiber-cone woofer with coaxial 1" PEI dome tweeter
Impedance8 ohms nominal
Power Handling25-120W recommended, 240W peak
Sensitivity86.5dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review)
Spinorama Preference Score1.52
Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub4.04
Weight16.5 lbs (7.5 kg) each
Woofer Cabinetported, bottom-firing