Short answer: the Vision Ears EXT MK II. Both are rated 3.9/5 for sound quality (#500 and #477 of 1291 in-ear headphones), and the Vision Ears EXT MK II costs $3,350 against $3,399 for the Kinera Loki Divine Mark, and with sound quality even, the cheaper one is the better buy.
Why pick the Kinera Loki Divine Mark: The median of 3 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 73 with a 1.87 dB spread. The catch: A 10.9 dB peak near 11.9 kHz can make cymbals and sibilance sound sharp.
The case for the Vision Ears EXT MK II: A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 73 against the Harman target. The tradeoff: Treble about 2 dB below target from 3 to 10 kHz, which can sound dull or veiled next to brighter headphones.
Buy the Vision Ears EXT MK II. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $49 less than the Kinera Loki Divine Mark.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.
The median of 3 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 73 with a 1.87 dB spread.
Kinera $3,399.00 eBay
A broadly balanced tuning with a preference score of 73 against the Harman target.
Vision Ears $3,350 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| Kinera Loki Divine Mark | Vision Ears EXT MK II | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3,399.00 | $3,350 |
| Ranked | #477 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #500 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 73 (median of 3 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 73 (median of 4 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 1.87 dB standard deviation | 2.04 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.33 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.34 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+2.4 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.2 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Hybrid (1 dynamic + 6 balanced armature + 4 electrostatic + 2 bone conduction) | Hybrid (2 dynamic + 4 electrostatic) |
| Drivers | 1 x dynamic + 6 x balanced armature + 4 x electrostatic + 2 x bone conduction | 1 x 9.2mm dynamic + 1 x 6mm dynamic + 4 x electrostatic |
| Impedance | 14 ohms | - |
| Sensitivity | 105 dB | - |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 50kHz (Manufacturer specified) | - |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the Kinera Loki Divine Mark from bassaudio, dl and hu-fi; the Vision Ears EXT MK II from faxepremium, kazi, silicagel and tonedeafmonk, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for Kinera Loki Divine Mark: