Short answer: the Kinera Loki Divine Mark. It ranks #477 of 1291 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 3.9/5, at $3,399; the Canpur CP622B ranks #550, rated 3.8/5, and costs $3,499, so there is little reason to consider the other one.
What the Kinera Loki Divine Mark does well: The median of 3 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 73 with a 1.87 dB spread. Watch for: A 10.9 dB peak near 11.9 kHz can make cymbals and sibilance sound sharp.
Why pick the Canpur CP622B: The median of 13 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 72 with a 1.92 dB spread. Watch for: Presence sits about 5.2 dB low with a 7.5 dB dip near 6.3 kHz, so vocals and instruments lose some bite.
Buy the Kinera Loki Divine Mark. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Canpur CP622B and costs less, so only choose the other one for a particular feature it does better.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.
The median of 3 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 73 with a 1.87 dB spread.
Kinera $3,399.00 eBay
The median of 13 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 72 with a 1.92 dB spread.
MusicTeck $3,499.00 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| Kinera Loki Divine Mark | Canpur CP622B | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3,399.00 | $3,499.00 |
| Ranked | #477 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #550 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 73 (median of 3 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 72 (median of 13 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 1.87 dB standard deviation | 1.92 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.33 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.61 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+2.4 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-0.8 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Hybrid (1 dynamic + 6 balanced armature + 4 electrostatic + 2 bone conduction) | Tribrid |
| Drivers | 1 x dynamic + 6 x balanced armature + 4 x electrostatic + 2 x bone conduction | 6 x balanced armature + 2 x electrostatic + 2 x bone conduction |
| Impedance | 14 ohms | 10 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 105 dB | - |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 50kHz (Manufacturer specified) | - |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the Kinera Loki Divine Mark from bassaudio, dl and hu-fi; the Canpur CP622B from aden, dchpgall, dl, ducbloke, eliseaudio, fahryst, hbb, kr0mka, smirk, soundignity, superreview, tgx78 and tonedeafmonk, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for Kinera Loki Divine Mark: