Short answer: the JBL Studio 698. It ranks #57 of 188 floorstanding speakers by sound quality, rated 4.3/5, at $1,499.90; the SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle ranks #125, rated 3.8/5, and costs $2,499, so there is little reason to consider the other one.
The JBL Studio 698 is the better-sounding pick. High-Definition Imaging (HDI) horn waveguide paired with a 1” compression driver provides excellent high-frequency directivity control and seamless acoustic handoff to the 6” PolyPlas midrange. Watch for: Measured response exhibits a prominent mid-bass emphasis bump around 80Hz that can sound overly thick or chesty in smaller rooms without DSP EQ.
The SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle is the more accurate, deeper-bass choice. Flagship three-way tower with a diamond-coated tweeter, dual midranges and four force-balanced 8-inch woofers. Its measured preference score, a predictor of how neutral it sounds, is 4.91 against 4.20 for the JBL Studio 698. Its bass reaches about 41Hz before falling 3dB, against 53Hz for the JBL Studio 698. The catch: The 5.25-to-8-inch transitions and complex array do not produce class-leading smoothness: 0.184 on-axis, 0.226 predicted in-room and 3.64 directivity-index consistency.
Buy the JBL Studio 698. It is rated higher for sound quality than the SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle and costs less, so it is the default pick unless a specific strength of the other one matters more to you.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Passive Home rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| JBL Studio 698 | SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1,499.90 per pair | $2,499.00 per pair |
| Ranked | #57 of 188 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers | #125 of 188 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 34Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | - |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 53Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 41.0Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner via spinorama.org) |
| Dimensions | 41.7”H x 11.8”W x 15.7”D (1058 x 300 x 400 mm) | 50.2H x 11.8W x 18.1D in |
| Impedance | 6 ohms nominal (4.1 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) | 6 ohms nominal |
| Sensitivity | 90dB (measured average, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 88dB |
| Drivers | 1 in. High-Definition Imaging compression driver, 6 in. PolyPlas midrange, dual 8 in. PolyPlas woofers | 1” diamond-coated tweeter, dual 5.25” midranges, quad 8” woofers |
| Weight | 78.9 lbs (35.8 kg) each | 96.8 lbs (43.9 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear | - |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 4.20 | 4.91 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.14 | 6.13 |
| DIY Kit | No | No |
| Enclosure | - | 3-way passive, dual rear ports |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More top alternatives to JBL Studio 698:
- JBL Studio 698 vs GR-Research NX-Treme
- JBL Studio 698 vs KEF Blade Two Meta
- JBL Studio 698 vs MoFi SourcePoint V10 Master Edition
- JBL Studio 698 vs MoFi SourcePoint 888
- Revel F328Be vs JBL Studio 698
Prices on this page were last checked October 7, 2026 at 9:25 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
JBL Studio 698: $1,499.90 per pair Crutchfield eBay
Older model: the JBL Studio 590 (ranked lower, rated 2.8/5).
Same family: the JBL Studio 630 (bookshelf, rated 3.6/5).
Pros: High-Definition Imaging (HDI) horn waveguide paired with a 1” compression driver provides excellent high-frequency directivity control and seamless acoustic handoff to the 6” PolyPlas midrange. Dual 8” PolyPlas woofers deliver robust low-end authority with solid bass extension down to an F3 of 53Hz and F10 of 34Hz. High voltage sensitivity (90dB SPL at 2.83V/1m) and clean power handling provide effortless dynamic headroom and low distortion for home theater and music listening. Measured bass extension of 53Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 90dB.
Cons: Measured response exhibits a prominent mid-bass emphasis bump around 80Hz that can sound overly thick or chesty in smaller rooms without DSP EQ. Treble response lacks top-octave ‘air’ above 12kHz compared to high-end dome or ribbon tweeters. Physically large, heavy cabinet (35.8 kg per speaker) requires careful room placement and a wide acoustic footprint.
Full JBL Studio 698 review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 34Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 53Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 41.7”H x 11.8”W x 15.7”D (1058 x 300 x 400 mm) |
| Drivers | 1 in. High-Definition Imaging compression driver, 6 in. PolyPlas midrange, dual 8 in. PolyPlas woofers |
| Impedance | 6 ohms nominal (4.1 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 90dB (measured average, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 4.20 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.14 |
| Weight | 78.9 lbs (35.8 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- JBL Studio 698 vs JBL HDI-3600
- JBL Studio 698 vs Polk Audio Reserve R700
- JBL Studio 698 vs PSB Imagine T65
- JBL Studio 698 vs Morel Avyra 633
- JBL Studio 698 vs Arendal 1961 Tower
- JBL Studio 698 vs KEF R11 Meta
- JBL Studio 698 vs Ascend Acoustics Sierra Titan Tower
- JBL Studio 698 vs Emotiva Airmotiv T2+
- See all 53 comparisons
SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle: $2,499.00 per pair Amazon SVS eBay
Same family: the SVS Ultra Evolution Nano (smaller bookshelf, estimated 3.9/5), the SVS Ultra Evolution Bookshelf (larger bookshelf, estimated 4/5), the SVS Ultra Evolution Tower (smaller floorstanding, ranked higher, estimated 4.1/5), the SVS Ultra Evolution Titan (smaller floorstanding, ranked higher, estimated 4.2/5) and the SVS Ultra Evolution Center (center, estimated 4.1/5).
Pros: Flagship three-way tower with a diamond-coated tweeter, dual midranges and four force-balanced 8-inch woofers. Erin measured exceptional 27Hz extension, broad roughly +/-75-degree horizontal coverage, an 88.1dB sensitivity and a 4.91 preference score even without a subwoofer. Measured bass extension of 41.0Hz (-3dB).
Cons: The 5.25-to-8-inch transitions and complex array do not produce class-leading smoothness: 0.184 on-axis, 0.226 predicted in-room and 3.64 directivity-index consistency. At 96.7 pounds each, these are difficult to position, and their Q of 1.25 indicates some bass emphasis. A dip in the upper midrange followed closely by a peak around 2 to 3kHz gives vocals a shouty, forward quality that toe-out alone does not resolve.
Full SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 41.0Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner via spinorama.org) |
|---|---|
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 50.2H x 11.8W x 18.1D in |
| Drivers | 1” diamond-coated tweeter, dual 5.25” midranges, quad 8” woofers |
| Enclosure | 3-way passive, dual rear ports |
| Impedance | 6 ohms nominal |
| Sensitivity | 88dB |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 4.91 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.13 |
| Weight | 96.8 lbs (43.9 kg) each |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle vs Polk T50
- SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle vs Definitive Technology BP-9020
- SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle vs Klipsch RP-6000F II
- SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle vs Dynaudio Emit 30
- SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle vs Focal Aria Evo X N°2
- SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle vs Klipsch RP-8000F II
- SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle vs Klipsch RP-5000F II
- SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle vs KEF Q11 Meta
- See all 23 comparisons