Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs NHT Pro M-00

Last updated: August 24, 2026

Short answer: the Focal Alpha 50 EVO. It ranks #34 of 60 powered bookshelf speakers by sound quality at $308; the NHT Pro M-00 ranks #60 and costs $498, so there is not much of a tradeoff to weigh.

What the Focal Alpha 50 EVO offers: The available response trace suggests reasonably smooth on-axis and listening-window behavior, with Spinorama narrow-band-deviation values of 0.448 and 0.366 respectively. With a subwoofer its calculated preference score is 5.05, and the rear shelving controls provide some useful room and placement adjustment. Watch for: The only Spinorama data is a low-quality graph digitization rather than a Klippel measurement, so the extreme calculated bass and sound-power results should not be taken literally. That limited dataset produces a very low 0.40 full-range preference score, weak predicted in-room smoothness, and unusually inconsistent directivity. Independent high-quality measurements are still needed.

What the NHT Pro M-00 offers: Cast aluminum-zinc alloy enclosure doubles as a heatsink for the built-in discrete Class AB amplifier, and both RCA and XLR/TRS inputs are provided with a near-field/far-field voicing switch. Watch for: Amir identified a critical flaw: a sudden suck-out in the upper bass frequencies that affects many commonly-used notes. Treble peaks on-axis, and vertical-axis performance is particularly problematic. In-room response turns notably bright in rooms with absorptive surfaces. Comparing directly to the JBL 305P Mark II, Amir found the NHT sounded “dead and bright” while the JBL was “balanced” with “rich and warm detail,” concluding, “I would not remotely use the NHT M-00 relative to JBL 305P Mark ii. The difference in overall fidelity and pleasantness is immense.” Long discontinued; not recommended even on the used market.

Buy the Focal Alpha 50 EVO. It ranks higher for sound quality than the NHT Pro M-00 and costs less, so there is no real case for the other one.

If sound quality matters at all to you, skip the NHT Pro M-00. It ranks near the bottom of the 60 powered bookshelf speakers, so look higher up the list instead.

Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs NHT Pro M-00

Specifications Side By Side

Focal Alpha 50 EVO NHT Pro M-00
Price$308.00$498 pair, discontinued (used market; originally $249 each)
Ranked#34 of 60 in Medium Size Powered Bookshelf Speakers#60 of 60 in Medium Size Powered Bookshelf Speakers
Dimensions12.2"H x 9"W x 9.4"D (309.9 x 228.6 x 238.8 mm)9H x 5.7W x 7.3D in
Frequency Response45 Hz - 22 kHz (+-3 dB) (Manufacturer specified)-
InputsXLR, TRS, RCARCA, XLR/TRS
Weight13.2 lbs / 6.0 kg each14 lbs / 6.35 kg each
Drivers5" (127mm) woofer1" ferrofluid-cooled fabric dome tweeter, 4.5" treated paper-cone woofer
AppNoNo
BluetoothNoNo
EQYes (Room adjustment)-
Output Power60w Per Speaker75W RMS continuous, 150W peak (per speaker)
DSP-No
Bass Extension (-3dB)-83.3Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-10dB)-59.7Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)

More useful head-to-heads from the same speaker class:

Prices on this page were last checked August 24, 2026 at 6:53 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

The Two Speakers In Full

Focal Alpha 50 EVO: $308.00 Amazon eBay

Focal Alpha 50 EVO ranking card

Pros: The available response trace suggests reasonably smooth on-axis and listening-window behavior, with Spinorama narrow-band-deviation values of 0.448 and 0.366 respectively. With a subwoofer its calculated preference score is 5.05, and the rear shelving controls provide some useful room and placement adjustment.

Cons: The only Spinorama data is a low-quality graph digitization rather than a Klippel measurement, so the extreme calculated bass and sound-power results should not be taken literally. That limited dataset produces a very low 0.40 full-range preference score, weak predicted in-room smoothness, and unusually inconsistent directivity. Independent high-quality measurements are still needed.

AppNo
BluetoothNo
Dimensions12.2"H x 9"W x 9.4"D (309.9 x 228.6 x 238.8 mm)
Drivers5" (127mm) woofer
EQYes (Room adjustment)
Frequency Response45 Hz - 22 kHz (+-3 dB) (Manufacturer specified)
InputsXLR, TRS, RCA
Output Power60w Per Speaker
Weight13.2 lbs / 6.0 kg each

NHT Pro M-00: $498 pair, discontinued (used market; originally $249 each) eBay

NHT Pro M-00 ranking card

Pros: Cast aluminum-zinc alloy enclosure doubles as a heatsink for the built-in discrete Class AB amplifier, and both RCA and XLR/TRS inputs are provided with a near-field/far-field voicing switch.

Cons: Amir identified a critical flaw: a sudden suck-out in the upper bass frequencies that affects many commonly-used notes. Treble peaks on-axis, and vertical-axis performance is particularly problematic. In-room response turns notably bright in rooms with absorptive surfaces. Comparing directly to the JBL 305P Mark II, Amir found the NHT sounded “dead and bright” while the JBL was “balanced” with “rich and warm detail,” concluding, “I would not remotely use the NHT M-00 relative to JBL 305P Mark ii. The difference in overall fidelity and pleasantness is immense.” Long discontinued; not recommended even on the used market.

AppNo
Bass Extension (-10dB)59.7Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)83.3Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
BluetoothNo
DSPNo
Dimensions9H x 5.7W x 7.3D in
Drivers1" ferrofluid-cooled fabric dome tweeter, 4.5" treated paper-cone woofer
InputsRCA, XLR/TRS
Output Power75W RMS continuous, 150W peak (per speaker)
Weight14 lbs / 6.35 kg each