Short answer: the Focal Alpha 50 EVO. It ranks #34 of 60 powered bookshelf speakers by sound quality at $308; the Edifier R2000DB ranks #40 and costs $399.99, so there is not much of a tradeoff to weigh.
What the Focal Alpha 50 EVO offers: The available response trace suggests reasonably smooth on-axis and listening-window behavior, with Spinorama narrow-band-deviation values of 0.448 and 0.366 respectively. With a subwoofer its calculated preference score is 5.05, and the rear shelving controls provide some useful room and placement adjustment. Watch for: The only Spinorama data is a low-quality graph digitization rather than a Klippel measurement, so the extreme calculated bass and sound-power results should not be taken literally. That limited dataset produces a very low 0.40 full-range preference score, weak predicted in-room smoothness, and unusually inconsistent directivity. Independent high-quality measurements are still needed.
What the Edifier R2000DB offers: Rated 3.7 in the SpeakerRanking database. Watch for: Slight lacking of bass and treble, slight inverted V EQ profile
Buy the Focal Alpha 50 EVO. It ranks higher for sound quality than the Edifier R2000DB and costs less, so there is no real case for the other one.
Specifications Side By Side
| Focal Alpha 50 EVO | Edifier R2000DB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $308.00 | $399.99 |
| Ranked | #34 of 60 in Medium Size Powered Bookshelf Speakers | #40 of 60 in Medium Size Powered Bookshelf Speakers |
| Dimensions | 12.2"H x 9"W x 9.4"D (309.9 x 228.6 x 238.8 mm) | 11.3"H x 7.5"W x 9.5"D (285.8 x 190.5 x 241.3 mm) |
| Frequency Response | 45 Hz - 22 kHz (+-3 dB) (Manufacturer specified) | 55Hz-40KHz (-3dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| Inputs | XLR, TRS, RCA | Bluetooth, 2x RCA Input, Digital Optical |
| Weight | 13.2 lbs / 6.0 kg each | 17.4 lbs / 7.9 kg |
| Drivers | 5" (127mm) woofer | 5" (127mm) woofer |
| App | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| EQ | Yes (Room adjustment) | No |
| Output Power | 60w Per Speaker | 60w RMS Per Speaker |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More useful head-to-heads from the same speaker class:
- Neumann KH80 DSP vs Presonus Eris E5
- Edifier S1000W vs Presonus Eris E5
- KEF LSX II LT vs Presonus Eris E5
- Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Focal Alpha 65 EVO
- Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Audioengine A5+ Classic
Prices on this page were last checked August 24, 2026 at 6:53 AM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Focal Alpha 50 EVO: $308.00 Amazon eBay
Pros: The available response trace suggests reasonably smooth on-axis and listening-window behavior, with Spinorama narrow-band-deviation values of 0.448 and 0.366 respectively. With a subwoofer its calculated preference score is 5.05, and the rear shelving controls provide some useful room and placement adjustment.
Cons: The only Spinorama data is a low-quality graph digitization rather than a Klippel measurement, so the extreme calculated bass and sound-power results should not be taken literally. That limited dataset produces a very low 0.40 full-range preference score, weak predicted in-room smoothness, and unusually inconsistent directivity. Independent high-quality measurements are still needed.
Full Focal Alpha 50 EVO review and specifications →
| App | No |
|---|---|
| Bluetooth | No |
| Dimensions | 12.2"H x 9"W x 9.4"D (309.9 x 228.6 x 238.8 mm) |
| Drivers | 5" (127mm) woofer |
| EQ | Yes (Room adjustment) |
| Frequency Response | 45 Hz - 22 kHz (+-3 dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| Inputs | XLR, TRS, RCA |
| Output Power | 60w Per Speaker |
| Weight | 13.2 lbs / 6.0 kg each |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Independent Measurements (spinorama.org; low-quality graph digitization)
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Adam Audio T5V sound.DEMO More from DSAUDIOreview →
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review APS Klasik 2020 vs Focal Alpha 50 EVO sound.DEMO
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Focal Alpha 65 EVO sound.DEMO
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs KRK Rokit 5 G4 RP5G4 sound.DEMO
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs JBL 305P MKII sound.DEMO
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Adam Audio A5X vs Focal Alpha 50 EVO sound.DEMO
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Eve Audio SC205 sound.DEMO
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Kali Audio LP-6 V2 (2nd Wave) vs Focal Alpha 50 EVO sound.DEMO
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs KRK Classic 5 CL5G3 sound.DEMO
- DSAUDIO.review: DSAUDIO.review Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Yamaha HS5 sound.DEMO
- Reddit Search for Focal Alpha 50 EVO Review
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Edifier R1280DB
- Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus
- Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Edifier R1280T
- Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Edifier MR4
- Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs KRK Classic 5
- Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Audioengine A5+ Classic
- Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Presonus Eris E5
- Focal Alpha 50 EVO vs Edifier S2000MKIII
- See all 42 comparisons
Edifier R2000DB: $399.99 Amazon eBay
Cons: Slight lacking of bass and treble, slight inverted V EQ profile
Full Edifier R2000DB review and specifications →
| App | No |
|---|---|
| Bluetooth | No |
| Dimensions | 11.3"H x 7.5"W x 9.5"D (285.8 x 190.5 x 241.3 mm) |
| Drivers | 5" (127mm) woofer |
| EQ | No |
| Frequency Response | 55Hz-40KHz (-3dB) (Manufacturer specified) |
| Inputs | Bluetooth, 2x RCA Input, Digital Optical |
| Output Power | 60w RMS Per Speaker |
| Weight | 17.4 lbs / 7.9 kg |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Edifier R2000DB vs Klipsch The Fives
- Edifier R2000DB vs Pioneer DJ VM-50
- Edifier R2000DB vs Edifier R1280DB
- Edifier R2000DB vs Edifier S1000W
- Edifier R2000DB vs Edifier S1000MKII
- Edifier R2000DB vs Vanatoo Transparent One Encore Plus
- Edifier R2000DB vs Edifier R1700BT
- Edifier R2000DB vs Edifier MR4
- See all 24 comparisons