Short answer: the FiiO FH3. Both are rated 3.3/5 for sound quality (#897 and #920 of 1291 in-ear headphones), and the FiiO FH3 costs $119.99 against $126.43 for the Creative Aurvana Ace 2, with sound quality a draw, the lower price decides it.
What the Creative Aurvana Ace 2 does well: True wireless earbuds with ANC, IPX5 water resistance and an unusually wide codec list, including aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC and LC3, so they get the best connection from most Android phones. Watch for: Squig.link hobbyist measurements put its preference score at 65, with bass and low mids running about 2 dB thick while an 8.9 dB peak near 7.9 kHz makes cymbals and sibilance sharp and splashy.
The case for the FiiO FH3: Bass and sub-bass sit within about 1 dB above the Harman target, giving kick drums and bass guitar a full, warm foundation without bloat. Watch for: The 3 to 6 kHz presence region sits about 5.7 dB below target, with a dip of 7.4 dB near 6.5 kHz, so vocals and cymbals lose bite and detail.
Buy the FiiO FH3. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $6.44 less than the Creative Aurvana Ace 2.
Still deciding? The full Headphones rankings cover every ranked option.
True wireless earbuds with ANC, IPX5 water resistance and an unusually wide codec list, including aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC and LC3, so they get the best connection from most Android phones.
Amazon $126.43 eBay
Bass and sub-bass sit within about 1 dB above the Harman target, giving kick drums and bass guitar a full, warm foundation without bloat.
Amazon $119.99 Lowest AliExpress $122.23 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| Creative Aurvana Ace 2 | FiiO FH3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $126.43 | $119.99 |
| Ranked | #920 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #897 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 65 (median of 7 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 65 (measured by HypetheSonics, via AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.44 dB standard deviation | 2.59 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.70 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.86 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.3 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+1.1 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | True wireless | Wired |
| Driver Type | Hybrid (1 dynamic + 1 xMEMS solid-state) | Hybrid (1 dynamic + 2 balanced armature) |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 1 x xMEMS solid-state | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 2 x balanced armature |
| Weight | 0 lbs (4.7 g) per earbud | 0 lbs (7.3 g) per earbud |
| Frequency Response | 5Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) | 10Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Active Noise Cancelling | Yes | - |
| Battery Life | 6 hours (24 with case, Manufacturer specified) | - |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.3 | - |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LC3 | - |
| Built-in Microphone | Yes | - |
| IP Rating | IPX5 | - |
| Impedance | - | 24 ohms |
| Sensitivity | - | 114 dB/mW |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the Creative Aurvana Ace 2 from aden, dhrme, kazi, listener, obodio, regancipher, therollo9 and vsg; the FiiO FH3 from adri-n, dentreviews, ekaudio, gadgetrytech, harutohiroki, jaytiss, lown-fi, melatonin, musicafe, precog, rg, superreview, theaudiostore, therollo9, timmyv and treblewellxtended, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
How FiiO FH3 compares with other leading options: