Short answer: a tie on sound quality. Both are rated 4.3/5 (#206 and #214 of 1291 in-ear headphones) at nearly the same price ($49.99 vs $50.99), so choose on features and fit.
Why pick the CCA Rhapsody: Two dynamic drivers and four balanced armatures deliver a preference score of 77 at a budget price, with an average deviation of only 1.5 dB from target in squig.link hobbyist measurements. Watch for: A 4.3 dB peak near 8 kHz and air about 4.6 dB over target can make cymbals and sibilance sound sharp on bright recordings.
What the Rose Technics QT-X does well: The median of 7 hobbyist measurements gives it a very good Harman preference score of 77 with a 1.62 dB spread. Watch for: A 4.5 dB peak near 1.7 kHz can make cymbals and sibilance sound sharp.
Buy the CCA Rhapsody or the Rose Technics QT-X on features: they are rated the same for sound quality at close to the same price.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.
Two dynamic drivers and four balanced armatures deliver a preference score of 77 at a budget price, with an average deviation of only 1.5 dB from target in squig.link hobbyist measurements.
Linsoul $49.99 eBay
The median of 7 hobbyist measurements gives it a very good Harman preference score of 77 with a 1.62 dB spread.
Amazon $50.99 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| CCA Rhapsody | Rose Technics QT-X | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $49.99 | $50.99 |
| Ranked | #206 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #214 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 77 (median of 13 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 77 (median of 7 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 1.49 dB standard deviation | 1.62 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.26 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | +0.32 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+1.2 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-2.3 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Hybrid (2 dynamic + 4 balanced armature) | Hybrid (1 dynamic + 6 balanced armature) |
| Drivers | 2 x 8mm dynamic + 4 x balanced armature | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 6 x balanced armature |
| Sensitivity | 102 dB | 108 dB |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) | 20Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Impedance | - | 18 ohms |
| Built-in Microphone | - | No |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the CCA Rhapsody from aftersound, boizoff, ducbloke, ianfann, jaytiss, obodio, pw, soundignity, tdl, theaudiostore, therollo9, tonedeafmonk and treblewellxtended; the Rose Technics QT-X from arn, obodio, soundcheck39, soundignity, theaudiostore, timmyv and treblewellxtended, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
More top alternatives to CCA Rhapsody: