Short answer: the Meze Alba. Both are rated 4.5/5 for sound quality (#73 and #79 of 450 in-ear headphones), and the Meze Alba costs $159 against $172.25 for the BQEYZ Cloud, and with sound quality even, the cheaper one is the better buy.
What the BQEYZ Cloud does well: The median of seven hobbyist measurements on squig.link gives the Cloud a preference score of 79.6 with only 1.46 dB of deviation, so it tracks the Harman target closely from deep bass through the upper mids. The catch: Air above 10 kHz runs about 4.3 dB hot, with a 5.4 dB peak near 8.1 kHz, so cymbals and sibilant vocals can sound edgy on bright recordings.
The case for the Meze Alba: Across 15 squig.link measurements it scores 79.7 for preference with a smooth 1.3 dB deviation. The tradeoff: Presence around 3 to 6 kHz runs 1.5 dB low while the 10 to 16 kHz air band climbs about 4 dB, so the treble can sound a touch thin and sparkly on top of a warm midrange.
Buy the Meze Alba. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $13.25 less than the BQEYZ Cloud.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| BQEYZ Cloud | Meze Alba | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $172.25 | $159.00 |
| Ranked | #79 of 450 in In-Ear Headphones | #73 of 450 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 80 (median of 7 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 80 (median of 15 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 1.46 dB standard deviation | 1.30 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | +0.30 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.48 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-1.8 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.2 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 1 x 6.8mm passive radiator | 1 x 10.8mm dynamic |
| Impedance | 32 ohms | 32 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 110 dB | 109 dB SPL/mW |
| Frequency Response | 7Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) | 15Hz - 25kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Built-in Microphone | No | - |
| Weight | - | 0 lbs (14 g) |
Related Headphone Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for Meze Alba:
- Dita Prelude vs Meze Alba
- Kiwi Ears Ember vs Meze Alba
- Meze Alba vs 7Hz Divine
- BQEYZ Cloud vs Dita Prelude
- SeeAudio Yume vs BQEYZ Cloud
Prices on this page were last checked October 11, 2026 at 4:59 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Headphones In Full
BQEYZ Cloud: $172.25 Amazon eBay
Pros: The median of seven hobbyist measurements on squig.link gives the Cloud a preference score of 79.6 with only 1.46 dB of deviation, so it tracks the Harman target closely from deep bass through the upper mids. Bass sits within 2 dB of target all the way down to 30 Hz, giving kick drums real weight without bloat, thanks partly to the passive radiator paired with its 10mm dynamic driver. At 32 ohms and 110 dB sensitivity it plays loudly straight from a phone or dongle.
Cons: Air above 10 kHz runs about 4.3 dB hot, with a 5.4 dB peak near 8.1 kHz, so cymbals and sibilant vocals can sound edgy on bright recordings. A 3.1 dB dip around 3.75 kHz also pulls vocal presence back slightly, and it costs more than the equally rated Final Audio A4000.
Full BQEYZ Cloud review and specifications →
| Released | 2024 (2 years ago) |
|---|---|
| Back | Closed |
| Built-in Microphone | No |
| Connection | Wired |
| Deviation From Target | 1.46 dB standard deviation |
| Driver Type | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 1 x 6.8mm passive radiator |
| Form Factor | In-ear |
| Frequency Response | 7Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Harman Preference Score | 80 (median of 7 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Impedance | 32 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 110 dB |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-1.8 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Tonal Tilt | +0.30 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
Meze Alba: $159.00 Amazon eBay
Pros: Across 15 squig.link measurements it scores 79.7 for preference with a smooth 1.3 dB deviation. Sub-bass is right on target and the 60 to 200 Hz bass is lifted 1.7 dB, giving a warm, full bodied presentation for pop and rock. Sensitivity of 109 dB SPL/mW means a phone drives it loudly, and it weighs just 14 g.
Cons: Presence around 3 to 6 kHz runs 1.5 dB low while the 10 to 16 kHz air band climbs about 4 dB, so the treble can sound a touch thin and sparkly on top of a warm midrange. The Shuoer S12 and Final Audio A4000 share its rating for less money.
Full Meze Alba review and specifications →
| Released | Jun 2024 (2 years ago) |
|---|---|
| Back | Closed |
| Connection | Wired |
| Deviation From Target | 1.30 dB standard deviation |
| Driver Type | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 1 x 10.8mm dynamic |
| Form Factor | In-ear |
| Frequency Response | 15Hz - 25kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Harman Preference Score | 80 (median of 15 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Impedance | 32 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 109 dB SPL/mW |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.2 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.48 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Weight | 0 lbs (14 g) |
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons