Short answer: a tie on sound quality. Both are rated 3.8/5 (#567 and #571 of 1291 in-ear headphones) at nearly the same price ($199 vs $199), so choose on features and fit.
Why pick the BQEYZ Autumn: The median of 11 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 71 with a 2.42 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural. Watch for: Sub-bass is 4.4 dB short at 30 Hz, so deep bass lacks rumble.
What the NiceHCK NX8 does well: Its 8 driver tribrid design measures smooth and warm across 20 measurers, with a 1.93 dB spread, bass about 1.6 dB above target and clean extension to 20 Hz. The catch: Presence drops about 4 dB with a 5.2 dB dip near 4.6 kHz, which takes some edge and clarity off vocals and guitars.
Buy the BQEYZ Autumn or the NiceHCK NX8 on features: they are rated the same for sound quality at close to the same price.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.
The median of 11 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 71 with a 2.42 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural.
HiFiGo $199.00 eBay
Its 8 driver tribrid design measures smooth and warm across 20 measurers, with a 1.93 dB spread, bass about 1.6 dB above target and clean extension to 20 Hz.
Amazon $199.00 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| BQEYZ Autumn | NiceHCK NX8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $199.00 | $199.00 |
| Ranked | #567 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #571 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 71 (median of 11 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 71 (median of 20 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.42 dB standard deviation | 1.93 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | +0.05 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.81 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-4.4 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.9 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Dynamic | Tribrid |
| Drivers | 1 x 13mm dynamic | 1 x dynamic + 6 x balanced armature + 1 x piezoelectric |
| Impedance | 46 ohms | 19 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 110 dB | 111 dB/mW |
| Frequency Response | 7Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) | 20Hz - 30kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
| Built-in Microphone | No | - |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the BQEYZ Autumn from arn, bedrock, bryaudioreviews, fahryst, hbb, ianfann, nymz, precog, rg, riz and superreview; the NiceHCK NX8 from aden, atechreviews, audioamigo, banzai1122, boizoff, cqtek, dl, eplv, flare, hobbytalk, jaytiss, kuping-sensi, obodio, silicagel, soundignity, superreview, tonedeafmonk, treblewellxtended, vortexreviews and zerostresslevel, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for BQEYZ Autumn: