Short answer: the Juzear Light Shuttle. Both are rated 3.8/5 for sound quality (#578 and #567 of 1291 in-ear headphones), and the Juzear Light Shuttle costs $179.99 against $199 for the BQEYZ Autumn, with sound quality a draw, the lower price decides it.
What the BQEYZ Autumn does well: The median of 11 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 71 with a 2.42 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural. Watch for: Sub-bass is 4.4 dB short at 30 Hz, so deep bass lacks rumble.
Why pick the Juzear Light Shuttle: The median of 15 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 71 with a 1.88 dB spread. The catch: Presence sits about 4.6 dB low with a 5.7 dB dip near 6.5 kHz, so vocals and instruments lose some bite.
Buy the Juzear Light Shuttle. Both are rated the same for sound quality, and it costs $19.01 less than the BQEYZ Autumn.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.
The median of 11 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 71 with a 2.42 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural.
HiFiGo $199.00 eBay
The median of 15 hobbyist measurements gives it a solid Harman preference score of 71 with a 1.88 dB spread.
Amazon $179.99 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| BQEYZ Autumn | Juzear Light Shuttle | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $199.00 | $179.99 |
| Ranked | #567 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #578 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 71 (median of 11 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 71 (median of 15 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.42 dB standard deviation | 1.88 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | +0.05 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.88 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-4.4 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+1.0 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Dynamic | Tribrid |
| Drivers | 1 x 13mm dynamic | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 4 x balanced armature + 2 x planar |
| Impedance | 46 ohms | 32 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 110 dB | 113 dB/mW |
| Frequency Response | 7Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) | 20Hz - 20kHz |
| Built-in Microphone | No | - |
| Weight | - | 0 lbs (6.4 g) |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the BQEYZ Autumn from arn, bedrock, bryaudioreviews, fahryst, hbb, ianfann, nymz, precog, rg, riz and superreview; the Juzear Light Shuttle from aftersound, atechreviews, audioamigo, bassaudio, boizoff, enemyspider, hbb, iemocean, jaytiss, koi, practiphile, precog, soundcheck39, superreview and tonedeafmonk, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
How BQEYZ Autumn compares with other leading options: