Short answer: the B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen on measured sound quality, the Turtlebox Ranger on price. The B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen ranks #10 of 142 medium speakers at $395. The Turtlebox Ranger ranks #56 at $250, $145 cheaper.
The case for the B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen: More neutral than the first A1. The tradeoff: Not stereo.
What the Turtlebox Ranger gets right: Much better frequency response than the other Turtlebox speakers. The catch: Bass sounds kind of thuddy and isn’t as deep as higher ranked speakers.
Buy the B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen if sound quality is the priority over the price, or the Turtlebox Ranger if the price is the priority over sound quality.
If battery life is a priority, the B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen is rated for 18 hours versus 12 hours for the Turtlebox Ranger.
Specifications Side By Side
| B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen | Turtlebox Ranger | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $395.00 | $250.00 |
| Ranked | #10 of 142 in Medium Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers | #56 of 142 in Medium Size Portable Bluetooth Speakers |
| App | Yes | - |
| Aux Input | No | - |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 58Hz | - |
| Battery Life | 18 hours (Manufacturer specified) | 12+ hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| Built in Microphone | Yes | - |
| EQ | Yes | - |
| IP Rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Bluetooth Latency | 90ms | - |
| Max Volume | 93dB | - |
| Power Bank | No | Yes (USB-C) |
| Stereo | No | No |
| Omnidirectional | Pointing up | No |
| TWS | Yes | Yes |
| Digital Aux Input | Yes (USB-C) | No |
| Weight | 1.2 lbs / 558 g | 2.4 lbs / 1089 g |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive | SBC (inferred; additional codecs unverified) |
| Power Input | USB-C | - |
| Drivers | 3.5mm aluminium driver + 0.75 inch silk dome tweeter | 2" (51mm) woofers |
| Bluetooth Version | - | 5.4 |
| Dimensions | - | 9.5" x 3.1" x 3.1" (241 x 80 x 80 mm) |
| Party Mode | - | Yes (Turtlebox Party Mode) |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen:
- B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen vs Soundcore Motion 300
- B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen vs Soundcore Motion+
- Soundcore Boost “upgraded” 2021 vs B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen
- Denon Envaya DSB-250BT vs B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen
- Minirig 3 vs B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen
Prices on this page were last checked September 8, 2026 at 6:02 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen: $395.00 Amazon eBay
Pros: B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen uses 3.5mm aluminium driver + 0.75 inch silk dome tweeter. Its 558 g, claimed 18 hours (Manufacturer specified) battery life, IP67 protection, up to 93dB and mono playback make it a practical option for its intended room or portable use.
Cons: Bass is limited by its 58Hz specification.
Full B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen review and specifications →
| App | Yes |
|---|---|
| Aux Input | No |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 58Hz |
| Battery Life | 18 hours (Manufacturer specified) |
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive |
| Bluetooth Latency | 90ms |
| Built in Microphone | Yes |
| Digital Aux Input | Yes (USB-C) |
| Drivers | 3.5mm aluminium driver + 0.75 inch silk dome tweeter |
| EQ | Yes |
| IP Rating | IP67 |
| Max Volume | 93dB |
| Omnidirectional | Pointing up |
| Power Bank | No |
| Power Input | USB-C |
| Stereo | No |
| TWS | Yes |
| Weight | 1.2 lbs / 558 g |
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- JOY‘s 🎧3D🔈Audio-Show: B&O Beoplay/Beosound A1 - all 3 generations compared More from Oluv’Sone →
- JOY‘s 🎧3D🔈Audio-Show: B&O Beosound A1 3rd gen vs 2nd gen - worth the premium?
- Alan Ross Reviews: B&O Beoplay A1 2nd gen vs Minirig mk3 bluetooth speaker More from alanrossreviews →
- Alan Ross Reviews: B&O Beoplay A1 2nd gen vs Minirig mk3 bluetooth speaker
- Alan Ross Reviews: Soundcore Motion Plus vs Beoplay A1 2nd gen - The Match!
- techkiste.net: B&O Beosound A1 (2nd Gen) vs Bose Revolve 2 vs Bose Revolve+ 2 sound-comparison
- Oluv Patreon: B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen vs Beoplay A1 outdoors with a bit of Anker Soundcore Motion+ too
- Oluv Patreon: (Anker) Soundcore Motion 300 - first impressions
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen vs B&O Beosound A1
- B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen vs JBL Charge 6
- B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen vs JBL Flip 6
- B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen vs Minirig 3
- B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen vs Soundcore Boost “original model” pre-2021
- B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen vs JBL Flip 7
- B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen vs Denon Envaya DSB-250BT
- B&O Beosound A1 2nd gen vs Soundcore Boost “upgraded” 2021
- See all 23 comparisons
Turtlebox Ranger: $250.00 Amazon eBay
Pros: Much better frequency response than the other Turtlebox speakers. Has magnets for attaching it to things. Appears to be quite tough
Cons: Bass sounds kind of thuddy and isn’t as deep as higher ranked speakers. Overpriced. Heavy for the size, likely due to the toughness
Full Turtlebox Ranger review and specifications →
| Battery Life | 12+ hours (Manufacturer specified) |
|---|---|
| Bluetooth Codecs | SBC (inferred; additional codecs unverified) |
| Bluetooth Version | 5.4 |
| Digital Aux Input | No |
| Dimensions | 9.5" x 3.1" x 3.1" (241 x 80 x 80 mm) |
| Drivers | 2" (51mm) woofers |
| IP Rating | IP67 |
| Omnidirectional | No |
| Party Mode | Yes (Turtlebox Party Mode) |
| Power Bank | Yes (USB-C) |
| Stereo | No |
| TWS | Yes |
| Weight | 2.4 lbs / 1089 g |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Turtlebox Ranger vs Soundcore 3/Soundcore Select 2
- Turtlebox Ranger vs Bose Soundlink Mini 2
- Turtlebox Ranger vs JBL Charge 4
- Turtlebox Ranger vs Bose Soundlink Mini
- Turtlebox Ranger vs Sony ULT Field 3
- Turtlebox Ranger vs Tribit Stormbox Flow
- Turtlebox Ranger vs Bose Soundlink Revolve
- Turtlebox Ranger vs Sonos Play
- See all 85 comparisons