Short answer: the Audio First Fidelia. It ranks #1 of 88 bookshelf speakers by sound quality (rated 4.8/5); the Arendal 1961 Monitor ranks #8 (rated 4.3/5).
What the Audio First Fidelia does well: Kit speaker offering exceptional value and tonal accuracy; chosen by reviewer as reference standard for future speaker tonality comparisons despite 1,250 USD price point. The tradeoff: Kit assembly required; lower sensitivity (~83-85 dB vs. typical 85 dB average) demands adequate amplifier power.
What the Arendal 1961 Monitor does well: A physically robust build the reviewer calls “a little bit of a tank,” delivering low compression, low distortion, and overall really good neutrality: one of the reviewer’s top 10 picks under $1,500 across roughly 250 speakers tested. The tradeoff: Bass rolls off around 70-80Hz, so it cannot be used as full-range mains for music without a subwoofer, and a sub is recommended for home theater use as well.
Buy the Audio First Fidelia. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Arendal 1961 Monitor.
Still deciding? The full Passive Home rankings cover every ranked option.
Specifications Side By Side
| Audio First Fidelia | Arendal 1961 Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £950 per pair for the flatpack kit (assembly required) | $1150 per pair |
| Ranked | #1 of 88 in Medium Size Bookshelf Speakers | #8 of 88 in Medium Size Bookshelf Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 38Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 60Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 53Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 84Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Crossover Frequency | 1560Hz | 1500Hz |
| Dimensions | 11.8”H x 7.1”W x 11.7”D (300 x 180 x 297.6 mm) | 16.6”H x 6.4”W x 5.9”D (421.6 x 162.6 x 149.9 mm) |
| Impedance | 4 ohms | 4 ohms nominal (4.1 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 84dB | 85.9dB (measured average, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Drivers | 5” ceramic-aluminum cone woofer, 1” ceramic-aluminum tweeter | 2 x 5.5” woofers, 28mm tweeter |
| Weight | 15 lbs (6.8 kg) each | 16 lbs (7.25 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear | sealed |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.45 | 3.38 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 8.46 | 6.69 |
| DIY Kit | Yes | No |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for Audio First Fidelia:
- Philharmonic Ceramic Mini vs Audio First Fidelia
- Ascend Sierra 1 v2 vs Audio First Fidelia
- KEF LS50 Meta vs Audio First Fidelia
- XMechanik Mechano23 DIY vs Audio First Fidelia
- Ascend Acoustics HTM-200SE2 vs Audio First Fidelia
Prices on this page were last checked September 30, 2026 at 2:57 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Audio First Fidelia: £950 per pair for the flatpack kit (assembly required) Audio First Designs eBay
Pros: Kit speaker offering exceptional value and tonal accuracy; chosen by reviewer as reference standard for future speaker tonality comparisons despite 1,250 USD price point. Achieves bass extension to 53 Hz (F3) and 38 Hz (F10) from compact cabinet. Direct-from-manufacturer availability eliminates retailer markup. Measured bass extension of 53Hz (-3dB).
Cons: Kit assembly required; lower sensitivity (~83-85 dB vs. typical 85 dB average) demands adequate amplifier power. Only available direct from UK manufacturer with associated shipping costs and lead times. Trade-off between compact driver configuration and maximum dynamic output.
Full Audio First Fidelia review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 38Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 53Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Crossover Frequency | 1560Hz |
| DIY Kit | Yes |
| Dimensions | 11.8”H x 7.1”W x 11.7”D (300 x 180 x 297.6 mm) |
| Drivers | 5” ceramic-aluminum cone woofer, 1” ceramic-aluminum tweeter |
| Impedance | 4 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 84dB |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.45 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 8.46 |
| Weight | 15 lbs (6.8 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Erin’s Audio Corner: The #1 Reason audiophiles Are Raving About Fidelia’s Sound Quality More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
- Erin’s Audio Corner: I Tested 250 Speakers So You Don’t Have To!
- Erin’s Audio Corner: My Absolute Favorite Products of 2024 Revealed
- Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Audio First Fidelia vs Philharmonic Ceramic Mini
- Audio First Fidelia vs Ascend Sierra 1 v2
- Audio First Fidelia vs KEF LS50 Meta
- Audio First Fidelia vs XMechanik Mechano23 DIY
- Audio First Fidelia vs Ascend Acoustics HTM-200SE2
- Audio First Fidelia vs Ascend Acoustics Luna V2 Mini-Monitor Titan
- Audio First Fidelia vs Aalto Speakers Aalto 1 EVO
- Audio First Fidelia vs Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G
- See all 25 comparisons
Arendal 1961 Monitor: $1150 per pair Arendal Sound eBay
Pros: A physically robust build the reviewer calls “a little bit of a tank,” delivering low compression, low distortion, and overall really good neutrality: one of the reviewer’s top 10 picks under $1,500 across roughly 250 speakers tested. Works well both as home theater mains and as surrounds. Independent ASR Klippel measurements corroborate the low-distortion finding: THD at 86dB SPL/1m stays well below the reviewer’s audibility threshold, and even at 96dB SPL/1m it stays “far better than most bookshelves” thanks to the built-in high-pass filter that protects the woofers. Measured bass extension of 84Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 85.9dB.
Cons: Bass rolls off around 70-80Hz, so it cannot be used as full-range mains for music without a subwoofer, and a sub is recommended for home theater use as well. Vertical radiation window is narrow, typical of MTM (mid-tweeter-mid) layouts (tighter than a standard two-way’s roughly ±20°) so a second home theater row sitting above or below the tweeter axis will hear a noticeably different tonal balance. ASR’s CEA2034 measurements show the response is elevated above 2kHz with resonant peaks around 3kHz and 9kHz, leading the reviewer to predict it will “likely sound bright.” Those same resonances show up as lingering ridges in the cumulative spectral decay (waterfall) at 96dB SPL/1m.
Full Arendal 1961 Monitor review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 60Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 84Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Crossover Frequency | 1500Hz |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 16.6”H x 6.4”W x 5.9”D (421.6 x 162.6 x 149.9 mm) |
| Drivers | 2 x 5.5” woofers, 28mm tweeter |
| Impedance | 4 ohms nominal (4.1 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured by Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 85.9dB (measured average, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 3.38 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 6.69 |
| Weight | 16 lbs (7.25 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | sealed |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Arendal 1961 Monitor vs SunAudio Purified 4
- Arendal 1961 Monitor vs Ascend Acoustics HTM-200SE2
- Arendal 1961 Monitor vs XMechanik Mechano23 DIY
- Arendal 1961 Monitor vs Ascend Acoustics Luna V2 Mini-Monitor Titan
- Arendal 1961 Monitor vs Aalto Speakers Aalto 1 EVO
- Arendal 1961 Monitor vs Moondrop M4P MTM
- Arendal 1961 Monitor vs KEF LS50 Meta
- Arendal 1961 Monitor vs Ascend Sierra 1 v2
- See all 55 comparisons