Fatfreq Sakura Review: Ranked #126 of 238

Last updated: October 10, 2026

The Fatfreq Sakura ranks #126 out of 238 total In-Ear Headphones for sound quality. See all Headphones rankings for every top pick.

Brand: Fatfreq

Prices on this page were last checked October 10, 2026 at 5:37 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

#126 Fatfreq Sakura FATfreq eBay

Pros: Crinacle’s measurement gives it a preference score of 70, a reasonably close match to the response most listeners prefer. It is a wired, closed in-ear design, so it blocks outside noise and needs no charging.

Cons: A 2.6 dB standard deviation from target means the response is noticeably uneven in places. There is no built-in microphone for calls.

ReleasedMay 2022 (4 years ago)
BackClosed
Built-in MicrophoneNo
ConnectionWired
Deviation From Target2.58 dB standard deviation
Form FactorIn-ear
Harman Preference Score70 (measured by crinacle, via AutoEQ)
Tonal Tilt-0.08 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
EQ preset to match the Harman target

Set a preamp of -6.1 dB, then add these filters in any parametric equalizer (Wavelet, Equalizer APO, Peace, or a player with parametric EQ). Calculated by AutoEQ from its measured frequency response.

FilterFrequencyGainQ
Low shelf105 Hz+1.9 dB0.70
Peak6,951 Hz+5.0 dB0.67
Peak1,700 Hz-4.1 dB1.72
Peak201 Hz-1.8 dB0.68
Peak70 Hz+0.8 dB1.12
High shelf10,000 Hz-2.3 dB0.70
Peak4,296 Hz-2.6 dB6.00
Peak3,478 Hz+1.6 dB4.53
Peak6,201 Hz+1.6 dB5.97
Peak818 Hz+0.5 dB2.49

More Fatfreq headphones →