These sit in different size classes, so this is not a straight ranking comparison. The Wharfedale Aura 2 ranks #13 of 157 bookshelf speakers by sound quality at $2,799; the Wharfedale Aura 3 ranks #21 of 139 floorstanding speakers by sound quality at $4,499.
The case for the Wharfedale Aura 2: Three-way “mini tower” design with a 27x90mm AMT tweeter, 4” mid-range, and 6.5” midwoofer, using an unusual bottom-firing port. Watch for: A breakup/peak around 13kHz can sound sharp or shrill depending on the track, the main tonal flaw noted.
What the Wharfedale Aura 3 does well: 3-way floorstanding tower speaker in the Aura series featuring dual 5-inch glass-fibre matrix woofers, a 4-inch glass-fibre midrange, and a 27x90mm AMT ribbon tweeter. Watch for: Rating estimated based on Aura series sibling testing.
Buy the Wharfedale Aura 2 at $2,799 for a bookshelf speaker, or the Wharfedale Aura 3 at $4,499 for a floorstanding speaker instead.
Want more options? Browse the full Passive Home rankings.
Specifications Side By Side
| Wharfedale Aura 2 | Wharfedale Aura 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2799 per pair | $4,499.00 per pair |
| Ranked | #13 of 157 in Large Size Bookshelf Speakers | #21 of 139 in Large Size Floorstanding Speakers |
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 30Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | - |
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 56Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 39Hz (manufacturer specified) |
| Dimensions | 22.1”H x 11.3”W x 15.3”D (561.3 x 287 x 388.6 mm) | 40.8”H x 9.7”W x 11.8”D (1037 x 246 x 300 mm) |
| Impedance | 6 ohms nominal (3.1 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 6 ohms nominal, 3.1 ohms minimum (manufacturer specified) |
| Drivers | 6.5” Black Glass Fibre Matrix Cone woofer, 4” Black Glass Fibre Matrix Cone midrange, 27x90mm AMT tweeter | 27x90mm AMT ribbon tweeter, 4” (100mm) glass fibre midrange, 2 x 5” (130mm) glass fibre woofers |
| Sensitivity | 87dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) | 88dB (2.83V/1m, manufacturer specified) |
| Weight | 45 lbs (20.4 kg) each | 50.7 lbs (23.0 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear | - |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.03 | - |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.65 | - |
| DIY Kit | No | No |
| Frequency Response | - | 39Hz - 22kHz (±3dB, manufacturer specified) |
| Bass Extension (-6dB) | - | 31Hz (manufacturer specified) |
Related Speaker Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for Wharfedale Aura 2:
- Wharfedale Aura 2 vs Perlisten S4b
- KEF Reference 1 Meta vs Wharfedale Aura 2
- Wharfedale Aura 2 vs GR-Research NX-Studio
- Wharfedale Aura 2 vs March Audio Sointuva AWG
- AsciLab C6B vs Wharfedale Aura 2
Prices on this page were last checked October 5, 2026 at 10:21 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
The Two Speakers In Full
Wharfedale Aura 2: $2799 per pair Crutchfield eBay
Smaller model: the Wharfedale Aura 1 (estimated 4.2/5).
Larger models: the Wharfedale Aura 3 (estimated 4.6/5) and the Wharfedale Aura 4 (estimated 4.7/5).
Pros: Three-way “mini tower” design with a 27x90mm AMT tweeter, 4” mid-range, and 6.5” midwoofer, using an unusual bottom-firing port. Nearly “ruler flat” on-axis linearity (within about 1.5dB for most of the range) apart from one specific breakup point. Exceptional output capability with very low distortion even at high volume: the reviewer reached about 100dB average at 10 feet with no audible strain, outperforming rivals like the KEF LS50 Meta in multitone distortion above 1kHz. Wide horizontal radiation of about ±70° combined with excellent imaging and pair matching: passed demanding stereo-separation test tracks with precise instrument placement. Bass reaches a genuine 40Hz in most rooms, potentially eliminating the need for a subwoofer for material that doesn’t demand extreme sub-bass. About 20dB of usable dynamic range with no compression issues at 96dB/1m. Considered by the reviewer one of the best speakers he’s tested, potentially challenging his personal all-time top five. Measured bass extension of 56Hz (-3dB), with a measured sensitivity of 87dB.
Cons: A breakup/peak around 13kHz can sound sharp or shrill depending on the track, the main tonal flaw noted. Minor midbase-to-midrange balance discrepancy (about 1dB), most noticeable if the speaker sits more than about 2 feet from the rear wall. Vertical listening window is narrower than typical, a consequence of the AMT ribbon tweeter’s tall physical size: staying within about ±15-20° of the tweeter reference axis (or slightly below it) is important. Impedance dips to about 3.1 ohms with a 1.4-ohm minimum EPDR, meaning a dedicated amplifier is recommended over an AVR due to potential power-supply strain. Distortion rises at the very lowest frequencies (an expected limitation of a 6.5” woofer), and the woofer audibly struggles with extreme 30-35Hz content at high volume. Horizontal directivity narrows from about ±70° to ±50° above roughly 6-7kHz as the ribbon tweeter’s pattern collapses inward.
Full Wharfedale Aura 2 review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-10dB) | 30Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 56Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 22.1”H x 11.3”W x 15.3”D (561.3 x 287 x 388.6 mm) |
| Drivers | 6.5” Black Glass Fibre Matrix Cone woofer, 4” Black Glass Fibre Matrix Cone midrange, 27x90mm AMT tweeter |
| Impedance | 6 ohms nominal (3.1 ohms minimum above 80Hz, measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Sensitivity | 87dB (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner) |
| Spinorama Preference Score | 6.03 |
| Spinorama Preference Score with Perfect Sub | 7.65 |
| Weight | 45 lbs (20.4 kg) each |
| Woofer Cabinet | ported, rear |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- Erin’s Audio Corner: Why the Wharfedale AURA 2 Will Blow Your Mind More from Erin’s Audio Corner →
- Erin’s Audio Corner Website Wharfedale Aura 2
- Erin’s Audio Corner: Upgrade Your Sound with These 6 Surprisingly Affordable Speakers!
- Erin’s Audio Corner: My Personal Favorite Speakers Under $2500
- Erin’s Audio Corner Measurements (spinorama.org)
- Head-to-Head Comparisons
- Wharfedale Aura 2 vs KEF Q Concerto Meta
- Wharfedale Aura 2 vs KEF R3
- Wharfedale Aura 2 vs KEF R3 Meta
- Wharfedale Aura 2 vs Buchardt Audio E50
- Wharfedale Aura 2 vs MoFi SourcePoint 8
- Wharfedale Aura 2 vs Revel M106
- Wharfedale Aura 2 vs Audio First Cadentia 3
- Wharfedale Aura 2 vs AsciLab C6B
- See all 52 comparisons
Wharfedale Aura 3: $4,499.00 per pair Estimated Wharfedale eBay
Smaller models: the Wharfedale Aura 2 (rated 4.6/5) and the Wharfedale Aura 1 (estimated 4.2/5).
Larger model: the Wharfedale Aura 4 (ranked higher, estimated 4.7/5).
Pros: 3-way floorstanding tower speaker in the Aura series featuring dual 5-inch glass-fibre matrix woofers, a 4-inch glass-fibre midrange, and a 27x90mm AMT ribbon tweeter. Yields low intermodulation distortion, expansive horizontal dispersion, and clean bass extension down to 39Hz via the SLPP slot port.
Cons: Rating estimated based on Aura series sibling testing. 4-ohm nominal impedance load with 88dB sensitivity requires dedicated, clean amplification for dynamic transients.
Full Wharfedale Aura 3 review and specifications →
| Bass Extension (-3dB) | 39Hz (manufacturer specified) |
|---|---|
| Bass Extension (-6dB) | 31Hz (manufacturer specified) |
| DIY Kit | No |
| Dimensions | 40.8”H x 9.7”W x 11.8”D (1037 x 246 x 300 mm) |
| Drivers | 27x90mm AMT ribbon tweeter, 4” (100mm) glass fibre midrange, 2 x 5” (130mm) glass fibre woofers |
| Frequency Response | 39Hz - 22kHz (±3dB, manufacturer specified) |
| Impedance | 6 ohms nominal, 3.1 ohms minimum (manufacturer specified) |
| Sensitivity | 88dB (2.83V/1m, manufacturer specified) |
| Weight | 50.7 lbs (23.0 kg) each |
- Links
- Reviews, Comparisons and Sound Samples
- No independent measurement review is linked for this model; it is ranked from hands-on listening and comparison against similarly priced speakers.
- Head-to-Head Comparisons