Short answer: a tie on sound quality. Both are rated 4.2/5 (#261 and #253 of 1291 in-ear headphones) at nearly the same price ($22.99 vs $25), so choose on features and fit.
What the TForce Yuanli does well: The median of 7 hobbyist measurements gives it a very good Harman preference score of 76 with a 1.78 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural. The catch: Treble sits about 3.5 dB low, so it sounds a little dark.
The case for the Tin HiFi Huo: The median of 8 hobbyist measurements gives it a very good Harman preference score of 77 with a 1.66 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.6 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural. The tradeoff: A 5.7 dB peak near 8.4 kHz can make cymbals and sibilance sound sharp.
Buy the TForce Yuanli or the Tin HiFi Huo on features: they are rated the same for sound quality at close to the same price.
Want more options? Browse the full Headphones rankings.
The median of 7 hobbyist measurements gives it a very good Harman preference score of 76 with a 1.78 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.5 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural.
Amazon $22.99 eBay
The median of 8 hobbyist measurements gives it a very good Harman preference score of 77 with a 1.66 dB spread, and its mids sit within about 0.6 dB of target, so vocals and instruments sound natural.
Amazon $25.00 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| TForce Yuanli | Tin HiFi Huo | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $22.99 | $25.00 |
| Ranked | #261 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #253 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 76 (median of 7 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 77 (median of 8 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 1.78 dB standard deviation | 1.66 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.45 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.31 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-0.5 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.3 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Dynamic | Hybrid (1 dynamic + 1 balanced armature) |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 1 x balanced armature |
| Impedance | 32 ohms | 20 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 103.5 dB | 108 dB |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz - 20kHz (Manufacturer specified) | - |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the TForce Yuanli from achoreviews, aftersound, bryaudioreviews, harpo, lown-fi, recode and rg; the Tin HiFi Huo from audioamigo, csi-zone, faxepremium, fernandagunsan, hbb, kuping-sensi, superreview and tonedeafmonk, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
How Tin HiFi Huo compares with other leading options: