Short answer: the Tangzu x Divinus Fudu. It ranks #767 of 1291 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 3.6/5, at $89; the KZ PR1 ranks #816, rated 3.5/5, at $87.99. With prices this close, go by the sound-quality ranking rather than the cost.
Why pick the Tangzu x Divinus Fudu: A hybrid collaboration between Tangzu and Divinus with one dynamic driver and two balanced armatures. The catch: Treble sits about 3.5 dB below target, a dark, relaxed balance.
Why pick the KZ PR1: Its 13.2 mm planar magnetic driver is rare at this price, and crinacle’s measurement gives it a preference score of 67. The catch: The squig.link measurements show a 10.5 dB peak near 11.2 kHz and air almost 12 dB above target, which can add glare and sizzle to cymbals.
Buy the Tangzu x Divinus Fudu. It is rated higher for sound quality, and the $1.01 you would save on the KZ PR1 does not close the gap.
Looking for alternatives? See the complete Headphones rankings.
A hybrid collaboration between Tangzu and Divinus with one dynamic driver and two balanced armatures.
Amazon $89.00 eBay
Its 13.2 mm planar magnetic driver is rare at this price, and crinacle’s measurement gives it a preference score of 67.
Amazon $87.99 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| Tangzu x Divinus Fudu | KZ PR1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $89.00 | $87.99 |
| Ranked | #767 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #816 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Hybrid | Planar magnetic |
| Drivers | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 2 x balanced armature | 1 x 13.2mm planar magnetic |
| Harman Preference Score | 68 (median of 3 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 67 (measured by crinacle, via AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 2.24 dB standard deviation | 2.36 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.73 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | -0.76 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+0.4 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+4.5 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Impedance | - | 16 ohms |
| Sensitivity | - | 96 dB |
| Frequency Response | - | 20Hz - 40kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the Tangzu x Divinus Fudu from ankramutt, ducbloke and silicagel; the KZ PR1 from achoreviews, ankramutt, bassyalexander, fahryst, harutohiroki, hbb, hore, ianfann, melatonin, pw, soundcheck39, timmyv and vortexreviews, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for Tangzu x Divinus Fudu: