Short answer: the Sonic Memory SM2. It ranks #42 of 1291 in-ear headphones by sound quality, rated 4.7/5, at $249; the Simgot EA1000 ranks #75, rated 4.6/5, and costs $259.99, which makes this an easy call rather than a real tradeoff.
Why pick the Sonic Memory SM2: Tuned close to the Harman target that most listeners prefer in blind tests (preference score 83). The tradeoff: The rating reflects sound quality only; comfort, build and noise isolation are not part of the score.
Why pick the Simgot EA1000: Measured 34 times by hobbyists on squig.link, it lands at a preference score of 80.6 with a perfectly neutral overall tilt. The tradeoff: Sub-bass trails target by about 1.7 dB and sits 2.5 dB down at 30 Hz, so the deepest synth and organ notes have less rumble than the midbass suggests.
Buy the Sonic Memory SM2. It is rated higher for sound quality than the Simgot EA1000 and costs less, so only choose the other one for a particular feature it does better.
Still deciding? The full Headphones rankings cover every ranked option.
Tuned close to the Harman target that most listeners prefer in blind tests (preference score 83).
e-earphone (JP) eBay
Measured 34 times by hobbyists on squig.link, it lands at a preference score of 80.6 with a perfectly neutral overall tilt.
Amazon $259.99 eBayPrices on this page were last checked October 16, 2026 at 5:46 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Specifications Side By Side
| Sonic Memory SM2 | Simgot EA1000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $249 | $259.99 |
| Ranked | #42 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones | #75 of 1291 in In-Ear Headphones |
| Form Factor | In-ear | In-ear |
| Back | Closed | Closed |
| Harman Preference Score | 83 (median of 3 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) | 81 (median of 34 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ) |
| Deviation From Target | 1.24 dB standard deviation | 1.58 dB standard deviation |
| Tonal Tilt | -0.16 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) | +0.00 (negative is warmer, positive brighter) |
| Sub-bass Extension | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-1.0 dB at 30 Hz) | Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-2.5 dB at 30 Hz) |
| Connection | Wired | Wired |
| Driver Type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Drivers | 1 x dynamic | 1 x 10mm dynamic + 1 x 6mm passive radiator |
| Impedance | - | 16 ohms |
| Sensitivity | - | 127 dB/Vrms |
| Frequency Response | - | 10Hz - 50kHz (Manufacturer specified) |
Frequency Response Compared
Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.
Measurement data: the Sonic Memory SM2 from lumerion, recode and therollo9; the Simgot EA1000 from achoreviews, atechreviews, bedrock, boizoff, bryaudioreviews, csi-zone, dl, eliseaudio, fahryst, gadgetgenerations, gadgetrytech, hbb, hobbytalk, hu-fi, ianfann, joycesreview, kazi, kuping-sensi, loomynarty, musicafe, obodio, practiphile, pw, regancipher, rg, sl0the, soundcheck39, soundignity, superreview, suporsalad, theaudiostore, therollo9, tonedeafmonk and treblewellxtended, all via squig.link.
Related Headphone Comparisons
More worthwhile head-to-heads for Sonic Memory SM2: