Revel M105 vs Sony SS-CS5 M2

Last updated: August 18, 2026

Short answer: the Revel M105 for better sound quality, the Sony SS-CS5 M2 for the lower price. The Revel M105 ranks #8 of 56 bookshelf speakers at $1500. The Sony SS-CS5 M2 ranks #25 at $278, $1222 cheaper.

The case for the Revel M105: CEA2034 spinorama shows an essentially flat on-axis response with only a small 5kHz peak, a smooth listening window, and clean waterfall decay. The tradeoff: Low nominal impedance demands a capable amplifier that can handle low-impedance loads.

What the Sony SS-CS5 M2 gets right: Added internal bracing (corners, sides, front baffle) plus an updated crossover meaningfully reduce the resonance issues that plagued the original SS-CS5, giving a smoother, more neutral character overall. The catch: Mild sibilance in the 3-5kHz range stands out on S and T sounds in vocals.

Buy the Revel M105 if sound quality matters more than the price. Buy the Sony SS-CS5 M2 if the price matters more than sound quality.

Revel M105 vs Sony SS-CS5 M2

Specifications Side By Side

Revel M105 Sony SS-CS5 M2
Price$1500 Discontinued$278.00
Ranked#8 of 56 in Medium Size Bookshelf Speakers#25 of 56 in Medium Size Bookshelf Speakers
Bass Extension (-3dB)75Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)80Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-10dB)58Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)54Hz (measured, Erin’s Audio Corner)
DiscontinuedYes-
Sensitivity85dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review)82.5dB
Impedance8 ohms nominal, low minimum6 ohms
Frequency Response60Hz - 44kHz (+/-3dB) (Manufacturer specified)-
Drivers5.25" aluminum cone woofer, 1" aluminum tweeter with acoustic lens waveguide5.12" woofer, 0.98 in tweeter
Weight15.4 lbs / 7 kg each9.5 lbs / 4.3 kg each
Dimensions14"H x 7.9"W x 9.8"D (355.6 x 200.7 x 248.9 mm)13.2"H x 7"W x 8.7"D (335 x 178 x 220 mm)
Woofer Cabinetported, rearported, rear
Supertweeter-0.75 in

More useful head-to-heads from the same speaker class:

The Two Speakers In Full

Revel M105: $1500 Discontinued

Revel M105 ranking card

Pros: CEA2034 spinorama shows an essentially flat on-axis response with only a small 5kHz peak, a smooth listening window, and clean waterfall decay. Wide horizontal dispersion gives flexibility with toe-in. The reviewer called it reference-quality performance with minor EQ correction applied.

Cons: Low nominal impedance demands a capable amplifier that can handle low-impedance loads. Bass distortion runs high in the 80-250Hz range from woofer displacement, and maximum output is limited compared to larger designs. Discontinued.

Bass Extension (-10dB)58Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Bass Extension (-3dB)75Hz (measured, Audio Science Review)
Dimensions14"H x 7.9"W x 9.8"D (355.6 x 200.7 x 248.9 mm)
DiscontinuedYes
Drivers5.25" aluminum cone woofer, 1" aluminum tweeter with acoustic lens waveguide
Frequency Response60Hz - 44kHz (+/-3dB) (Manufacturer specified)
Impedance8 ohms nominal, low minimum
Sensitivity85dB (2.83V/1m, measured, Audio Science Review)
Weight15.4 lbs / 7 kg each
Woofer Cabinetported, rear

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Sony SS-CS5 M2: $278.00 Amazon

Sony SS-CS5 M2 ranking card

Pros: Added internal bracing (corners, sides, front baffle) plus an updated crossover meaningfully reduce the resonance issues that plagued the original SS-CS5, giving a smoother, more neutral character overall. A modest mid-range dip (about 1-2dB) is present but tolerable, and the reviewer would rather have this dip than a peak in that region. Slightly deeper bass than the previous version, measuring about 2dB more output around 60Hz. Distortion drops noticeably when crossed to a subwoofer around 80-120Hz, meaningfully improving midrange clarity and detail versus running full-range. Easy to drive on a standard AVR - no need for a dedicated high-power amplifier. More modern, understated waveguide look compared to the previous version’s glossy trim.

Cons: Mild sibilance in the 3-5kHz range stands out on S and T sounds in vocals. Some forwardness in the midrange noticeable on certain vocal recordings. Soundstage and sense of envelopment are comparatively flat and two-dimensional, especially next to reference-quality speakers with strong 3D imaging. Marketed as a “three-way” design mainly due to an added super-tweeter that the reviewer considers largely superfluous - it engages only at very high frequencies and adds complexity without a clearly audible benefit, when that cost might have been better spent on the main crossover. Output-limited: realistic ceiling is around the mid-90s dB SPL at a few meters, with comfortable listening closer to 75-85dB at 3-4 meters before distortion and compression become audible. Bass noticeably compresses/shelves below about 120Hz as volume increases, softening kick-drum impact at higher output. Smaller drivers and a lighter motor structure than rivals like the Polk XT20, which the reviewer generally prefers for its better directivity and higher SPL capability. Still needs a subwoofer for any real bass extension.

Bass Extension (-10dB)54Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Bass Extension (-3dB)80Hz (measured, Erin's Audio Corner)
Dimensions13.2"H x 7"W x 8.7"D (335 x 178 x 220 mm)
Drivers5.12" woofer, 0.98 in tweeter
Impedance6 ohms
Sensitivity82.5dB
Supertweeter0.75 in
Weight9.5 lbs / 4.3 kg each
Woofer Cabinetported, rear

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.