QoA Mimosa vs ZHULINNIAO JINGHONG

Last updated: October 17, 2026

Short answer: a tie on sound quality. Both are rated 3.1/5 (#1040 and #1037 of 1369 in-ear headphones) at nearly the same price ($9 vs $9), so choose on features and fit.

QoA Mimosa vs ZHULINNIAO JINGHONG

Why pick the QoA Mimosa: About 3 dB more bass than the Harman target below 150 Hz, for listeners who want a fuller low end. The catch: An uneven response, 2.5 dB standard deviation from target.

The case for the ZHULINNIAO JINGHONG: A published AutoEQ preset corrects its response toward the Harman target, so a few minutes of EQ setup closes most of the gap. Watch for: Treble about 2 dB above target from 3 to 10 kHz, which can sound sharp or tiring at higher volume.

Buy the QoA Mimosa or the ZHULINNIAO JINGHONG on features: they are rated the same for sound quality at close to the same price.

Still deciding? The full Headphones rankings cover every ranked option.

QoA Mimosa

About 3 dB more bass than the Harman target below 150 Hz, for listeners who want a fuller low end.

Shenzhenaudio eBay
9
ZHULINNIAO JINGHONG

A published AutoEQ preset corrects its response toward the Harman target, so a few minutes of EQ setup closes most of the gap.

Amazon eBay
9

Prices on this page were last checked October 17, 2026 at 6:04 PM UTC. Product prices and availability are accurate as of that date/time and are subject to change; the price and availability shown on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

As an eBay Partner, we may be compensated if you make a purchase.

Specifications Side By Side

QoA Mimosa ZHULINNIAO JINGHONG
Price9.009.00
Ranked#1040 of 1369 in In-Ear Headphones#1037 of 1369 in In-Ear Headphones
Form FactorIn-earIn-ear
BackClosedClosed
Harman Preference Score63 (median of 6 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)63 (median of 4 squig.link measurements, calibrated to AutoEQ)
Deviation From Target2.52 dB standard deviation2.93 dB standard deviation
Tonal Tilt-0.95 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)+0.53 (negative is warmer, positive brighter)
Sub-bass ExtensionWithin 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (+1.8 dB at 30 Hz)Within 6 dB of target down to 20 Hz (-3.9 dB at 30 Hz)
ConnectionWiredWired
Driver TypeHybridDynamic
Drivers1 DD + 1 Planar (1 x 10mm dynamic driver + 1 x 6mm micro-planar driver)2 x dynamic driver (1 x 10mm bamboo fiber & silk suspension diaphragm + 1 x 6mm PU+PEEK composite diaphragm)
Impedance32 ohms32 ohms
Sensitivity102 dB105 dB/mW
Frequency Response20Hz - 20kHz20Hz - 20kHz
Weight0 lbs (3.2 g) (per earbud)-

Frequency Response Compared

Both headphones’ measurements overlaid on the Harman target. Above the target sounds louder in that range, below it quieter. Each curve is the median of several independent measurements, shifted so its 500 Hz to 2 kHz average sits at 0 dB, so only the tuning is compared.

QoA MimosaZHULINNIAO JINGHONGHarman target
Frequency response of the QoA Mimosa and ZHULINNIAO JINGHONG-24-18-12-60+6+12+18dB20501002005001k2k5k10k20k

Measurement data: the QoA Mimosa from bassaudio, gadgetrytech, hu-fi, kazi, soundcheck39 and tonedeafmonk; the ZHULINNIAO JINGHONG from aftersound, hobbytalk, ianfann and pw, all via squig.link.

How ZHULINNIAO JINGHONG compares with other leading options: